Biomedical subjects

Olav B Smeland

Publications and source records attributed to Olav B Smeland.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Beyond exons: Linking noncoding heritability and polygenicity across complex human traits and disorders.

The genetic architecture of complex traits spans a continuum of polygenicity, yet it remains unclear how differences in polygenicity relate to the functional localization of SNP heritability across the genome. We use a MiXeR-based framework to partition heritability across 74 functional annotations covering exonic, intronic, and intergenic regions for 34 complex traits and introduce a likelihood-based annotation contribution score that quantifies annotation-specific impact on heritability. Exons account for a minority of heritability, and their contribution decreases with increasing polygenicity, from an average of 22% in less-polygenic somatic diseases and biomarkers to 13% in highly polygenic psychiatric and cognitive phenotypes. Intergenic fractions show the opposite trend, whereas intronic fractions remain relatively stable. Analysis of the broader set of functional annotations also reveals systematic differences along the polygenicity axis: highly polygenic traits show stronger contributions from comparative genomics and variant-effect scores, whereas less-polygenic traits show stronger contributions from promoter, transcription, and chromatin annotations. Together, these results indicate that the functional partitioning of heritability systematically varies with polygenicity, shifting from gene-proximal regulatory architectures to architectures shaped by numerous dispersed regulatory effects.

MiXeR↗

PubMed2026

Beyond Exons: Linking Noncoding Heritability and Polygenicity across Complex Human Traits and Disorders.

The genetic architecture of complex traits spans a continuum of polygenicity, yet it remains unclear how differences in polygenicity relate to the functional localization of SNP heritability across the genome. We use a MiXeR-based framework to partition heritability across exonic, intronic, and intergenic regions for 34 traits and introduce a likelihood-based annotation contribution score that quantifies annotation-specific impact on heritability. Exons explain a minority of heritability, and their contribution decreases with increasing polygenicity, from an average of 22% in less polygenic somatic diseases and biomarkers to 13% in highly polygenic psychiatric and cognitive phenotypes. Intergenic fractions show the opposite trend, whereas intronic fractions remain relatively stable. Analysis of a broader set of functional annotations reveals systematic differences along the polygenicity axis: highly polygenic traits show stronger contributions from comparative genomics and variant-effect scores, whereas less polygenic traits show stronger contributions in promoter, transcription, and chromatin annotations. Together, these results indicate that the functional partitioning of heritability systematically varies with polygenicity, pointing to a shift from gene-proximal regulatory architectures to architectures shaped by numerous dispersed regulatory effects as a key determinant of differences in polygenicity across traits.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Leveraging the genetics of psychiatric disorders to prioritize potential drug targets and compounds.

Genetics can inform biologically relevant drug development and repurposing, which may improve patient care. Here, we leverage the genetics of psychiatric disorders to prioritize potential drug targets and compounds. We used the genome-wide association studies of four psychiatric disorders [attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia] and genes encoding drug targets. We conducted drug enrichment analyses incorporating the novel and biologically specific GSA-MiXeR tool. We conducted multiple molecular trait analyses using large-scale transcriptomic and proteomic datasets sampled from brain and blood tissue. This included the novel use of the UK Biobank proteomic data for a proteome-wide association study of psychiatric disorders. With the accumulated evidence, we prioritize potential drug targets and compounds for each disorder. We reveal candidate drug targets associated with a single or multiple disorders that implicate glutamate signaling. Drug prioritization indicated genetic support for psychotropic medications, including several top-ranked antipsychotics for schizophrenia. We also observed genetic support for commonly used psychotropics for psychiatric treatment (e.g., clozapine, duloxetine, and lithium). Revealed opportunities for drug repurposing included cholinergic drugs for ADHD, estrogen modulators for depression, and matrix metalloproteinases for ADHD and depression. Our findings indicate the genetic liability to schizophrenia is associated with reduced brain and blood expression of CYP2D6, a gene encoding a metabolizer of drugs and neurotransmitters, suggesting a genetic risk for poor drug response and altered neurotransmission. Our extensive analyses highlight the utility of genetics for informing drug development and repurposing for psychiatric disorders, providing novel opportunities for improving patient outcomes. Depicted is the series of analyses conducted to generate a list of prioritized drug targets and compounds. First pairings of genome-wide association study (GWAS) traits with drugs are generated using enrichment analyses. Next, a series of molecular trait analyses is conducted to generate and rank a list of potential drug targets for each GWAS trait. Finally, enrichment and molecular trait results are combined to generate a ranked list of prioritized drugs for each GWAS trait based on supporting genetic evidence. ADHD = Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, BIP = Bipolar disorder, DEP = Depression, SCZ = Schizophrenia, DBP = Diastolic blood pressure, T2D = Type 2 diabetes, RNA = ribonucleic acid, XWAS = both transcriptome and proteome-wide association studies, MR = Mendelian randomization, coloc = colocalization.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

A genome-wide analysis of the shared genetic risk architecture of complex neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Although neurological and psychiatric disorders have historically been considered to reflect distinct pathogenic entities, recent findings suggest shared pathophysiological mechanisms. However, the extent to which these heritable disorders share genetic influences remains unclear. Here we performed a comprehensive analysis of genome-wide association study data, involving nearly 1 million cases across ten neurological diseases and ten psychiatric disorders, to compare their common genetic signal and biological associations. Using complementary statistical tools, we demonstrate that a large set of common genetic variants impacts the risk of multiple neurological and psychiatric disorders, even in the absence of genetic correlations. Furthermore, genome-wide association studies on psychiatric disorders consistently implicate neuronal biology, whereas neurological diseases are associated with diverse neurobiological processes. Together, this study elucidates the genetic relationship between complex neurological and psychiatric disorders, indicating a larger degree of genetic pleiotropy than previously recognized. The findings have implications for disease classification, precision medicine and clinical practice.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Genome-wide analysis of screen behaviors among adolescents identifies novel loci and overlap with educational attainment and mental disorders.

Technological devices play a central role in adolescents' life. Despite concerns about negative effects of excessive screen time, there is little knowledge of screen behaviors' genetic architecture. Using self-reports from adolescents in the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (n = 18,490), we performed genome-wide association analysis for four screen behaviors: time spent (1) watching television; (2) gaming; (3) sitting/lying down with a screen device; and (4) using social media. The resulting summary statistics were analysed using the conditional false discovery rate (condFDR) approach to increase genetic discovery. We also estimated SNP-heritabilities of the screen behaviors and genetic correlations with eight psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anorexia nervosa, cannabis use disorder and alcohol use disorder), and educational attainment. Screen behaviors displayed significant SNP-heritabilities (0.048-0.12). We observed significant genetic correlations between screen behaviors and psychiatric disorders (rg range: 0.21-0.42). Educational attainment demonstrated negative genetic correlation with screen behaviors, most strongly with social media use (rg = - 0.69). CondFDR analysis identified three novel loci associated with social media use. Thus, we show that screen behaviors are heritable, polygenic traits that partly share genetic signal with mental disorders and educational attainment.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Comorbidity alters the genetic relationship between anxiety disorders and major depression.

BACKGROUND: Comorbid anxiety disorders (ANX) and major depression (MD) have worse clinical outcomes than either disorder alone. Analysis of genomic data based on comorbidity status may reveal more precise biological pathways and causal relationships with potential clinical implications. We investigated the genetic relationship between ANX and MD with and without mutual comorbidity. METHODS: We leveraged data from UK Biobank to perform disorder-specific genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of ANX-only (n=189,422) and MD-only (n=194,339) and generate polygenic risk scores (PRS). The Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort (MoBa, n = 130,992) served to test the associations of PRS with diagnoses. MD and ANX GWAS, including comorbidities (MD-comorbid and ANX-comorbid), were used for comparison. Genetic correlations were compared by comorbidity status, and Mendelian randomization was employed to assess causal relationships. RESULTS: The MD-only PRS showed a stronger association with MD-only compared to ANX-only cases (Z=3.74; Padjusted=0.002); however, MD-comorbid PRS did not show a significant difference (Z=2.71; Padjusted=0.08). The genetic correlation between ANX-only and MD-only was 0.53, lower than between ANX-comorbid and MD-comorbid (0.90). ANX-only showed a causal relationship with MD-only (Padjusted=0.015), but not vice versa, and contrasted the bidirectional causal relationship (Padjusted=2.9e-12, and Padjusted=9.3e-06) when comorbidity was included. Gene sets of MD-comorbid, ANX-comorbid, and MD-only, but not of ANX-only, were enriched for immune regulation pathways such as interleukin production. CONCLUSIONS: ANX and MD show more distinct genetics when comorbid cases are excluded, and ANX may be causal for MD. Disorder-specific genetic studies help uncover more relevant biological mechanisms and guide tailored clinical interventions.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Mapping Cerebellar Morphology in 15q11.2 CNV Carriers Using Normative Modeling.

Copy number variations (CNVs) at the 15q11.2 locus of the human genome have been associated with altered brain structure and increased risk for neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. The cerebellum is increasingly seen as a crucial brain region for neurodevelopmental conditions, yet the effects of 15q11.2 CNVs on cerebellar morphology remain largely unclear. Importantly, 15q11.2 CNVs shows reduced or incomplete penetrance (meaning that not all CNV carriers are affected) and variable expressivity (meaning that symptoms may differ between individuals with the same genetic alteration). Thus, there is a need to not only assess group differences, but also to quantify anatomical variability at the individual level. Here, we address these issues using normative models of brain anatomy trained on large datasets (n > 52k, age range: 3-85) to assess both group and individual-level deviations in cerebellar anatomy in carriers of 15q11.2 deletions (n = 120, mean [SD] age= 64.95 [7.58]) and duplications (n = 149, mean [SD] age=64.31 [7.21]), compared to non-carriers (n = 19,028, mean [SD] age=64.31 [7.58]). Group-level case-control analyses revealed significantly smaller total and regional cerebellar volumes in both deletion and duplication carriers, though with small effect sizes. Individual-level deviation analyses, capturing pronounced alterations in specific individuals, revealed a heterogeneous pattern among carriers. Overall, our findings suggest that CNVs at the 15q11.2 locus exert modest and highly individualized effects on cerebellar morphology.

15q11.2↗