Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

O Ortega

Publications and source records attributed to O Ortega.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Peritoneal sodium mass removal in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis: influence on blood pressure control.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Sodium and water retention is common in peritoneal dialysis patients and contributes to cardiovascular disease. As peritoneal sodium removal depends partly on dwell time, and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) often uses short dwell time exchanges, the aim of this study was to compare the 24-hour peritoneal sodium removal in APD and standard continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients and to analyze its possible influence on blood pressure control. METHODS: A total of 53 sodium balance studies (30 in APD and 23 in CAPD) were performed in 36 stable peritoneal dialysis patients. The 24-hour net removal of sodium was calculated as follows: M = ViCi - VdCd, where Vd is the 24-hour drained volume, Cd is the solute sodium concentration in Vd, Vi is the amount of solution used during a 24-hour period, and Ci is the sodium concentration in Vi. Peritoneal sodium removal was compared between APD and CAPD patients. Residual renal function, serum sodium concentration, daily urinary sodium losses, weekly peritoneal Kt/V and creatinine clearance, 4-hour dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio, proportion of hypertonic solutions, net ultrafiltration, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and need for antihypertensive therapy were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: Peritoneal sodium removal was higher (p < 0.001) in CAPD than in APD patients. There were no significant differences in residual renal function, serum sodium concentration, urinary sodium losses, peritoneal urea or creatinine clearances, 4-hour dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio, or proportion of hypertonic solutions between groups. The net ultrafiltration was higher in CAPD patients and correlated strongly (r = 0.82; p < 0.001) with peritoneal sodium removal. In APD patients, peritoneal sodium removal increased significantly only in those patients with a second daytime exchange. The systolic blood pressure was higher (p < 0.05) in APD patients, and the proportion of patients with antihypertensive therapy was also higher in APD patients, although no significant relationship between blood pressure values and amount of peritoneal sodium removal was found. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-hour sodium removal is higher in CAPD than in APD patients, and there is a trend towards better hypertension control in CAPD patients. As hypertension control and volume status are important indices of peritoneal dialysis adequacy, our results have to be considered in the choice of the peritoneal dialysis modality.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Influencing factors in the control of phosphorus in peritoneal dialysis. Therapeutic options].

UNLABELLED: Impaired phosphate excretion resulting in hyperphosphatemia is one of the earliest consequences of chronic renal failure. To control serum phosphate levels, we can use the following therapies: 1) Restriction of dietary phosphate (but on CAPD, obligatory protein losses via peritoneal fluid makes impractical any reduction of phosphate diet. 2) Reduction of phosphate absorption, using phosphate binders. 3) Peritoneal phosphate removal. OBJECTIVE: 1) To evaluate the factors affecting peritoneal phosphate removal such as plasma phosphate, peritoneal membrane transport type, peritoneal dialysis modality prescription (CAPD or APD) and daily dialysate volume. 2) To test the best calcium concentration in the peritoneal dialysis fluid (5, 6 or 7 mg/dl) in order to permit the use of calcium carbonate or acetate without the risk of hypercalcemia or hyperparathyroidism. METHOD: Phosphate was measured in seventy 24-hour dialysate collections, 33 from patients on CAPD and 37 from patients on APD. 24-hour peritoneal phosphate removal (mg/24 hours) and weekly peritoneal phosphate clearance was calculated (L/week). The peritoneal membrane was studied by the peritoneal equilibrium test (PET), using a 2.27% glucose. We calculated also the peritoneal calcium balance in 25 daily peritoneal fluid collections from patients using a calcium dialysate concentration of 5, 6 or 7 mg/dl each one. IPTH levels and doses of vitamin D were compared at 6 months in patients using a calcium concentration of 5, 6 or 7 mg/dl from the beginning of peritoneal dialysis (5 patients of each calcium dialysate concentration). RESULTS: Weekly peritoneal phosphate clearance (WPC) were higher or APD than on CAPD (51 +/- 21 vs 41 +/- 14, p < 0.005). Daily dialysate volume was also higher on APD (14 +/- 4 vs 7.8 +/- 1.8 L/day, p < 0.001). WPC was higher on APD when a mild-day exchange was done (61 +/- 23 vs 45 +/- 15, p < 0.005), instead an equal total daily volume of the dialysate. Peritoneal calcium balance was significantly more negative in patients using a calcium in the dialysis fluid of 5 than 6 or 7 mg/dl (-125 +/- 7 vs -18 +/- 41 vs -11 +/- 49, p < 0.001). At 6 months, patients using a calcium fluid concentration of 5 mg/dl increased iPTH levels (from 160 +/- 101 to 332 +/- 153, p < 0.001) and vitamin D needs (from 0 to 1.87 +/- 0.37 mcg/week, p < 0.001). In summary, peritoneal phosphate clearance depends on plasma phosphate levels, daily volume of dialysate prescribed and peritoneal membrane transport characteristics. It can be improved by increasing the total peritoneal fluid. On APD, a mild-day exchange may improve phosphate clearance, without total volume increase. The risk of secondary hyperparathyroidism can be decreased with a calcium fluid concentration of 6 mg/dl, which was shown to be better than 5 mg/dl when calcium phosphate binders are not correctly taken.

Calcium↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Academies and Institutes↗