Biomedical subjects

Nuzulul Kurniansyah

Publications and source records attributed to Nuzulul Kurniansyah.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

A multiancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease is associated with cognitive decline and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations.

Previously derived polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) perform inconsistently across diverse ancestries. We developed an APOE-independent multiancestry AD PRS using genome-wide association study summary statistics applied to European ancestry, African American, Caribbean Hispanic and East Asian cohorts. PRS performance was evaluated in a large independent multiancestry dataset and validated in several additional multiancestry cohorts. The PRS was significantly associated with AD in European ancestry, African American, Caribbean Hispanic and Native American Hispanic groups with adjusted odds ratios between 1.14 and 1.52 per PRS standard deviation. PRS performance was validated in the replication cohorts (odds ratios: 1.21-1.65). The PRS was also associated with poorer memory, executive function and language performance, greater AD-related neuropathological burden, reduced hippocampal volume, lower cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β42 and elevated total tau and phosphorylated tau, with stronger phosphorylated tau associations observed in women. Our findings support the value of ancestry-aware PRSs as a component of broader multimodal risk stratification frameworks.

Aged↗

PubMed2025

A multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer disease is associated with cognitive decline, hippocampal atrophy and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations.

Alzheimer disease (AD) has a strong genetic basis, yet previously derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) are heavily weighted by the APOE locus and perform inconsistently across diverse ancestries. We developed an APOE-independent multi-ancestry AD PRS using genome-wide association study summary statistics from cohorts in the United States, Europe and East Asia that were applied to European ancestry (EA), African American (AA), Caribbean Hispanic (CH), and East Asian cohorts from the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium. PRS performance was evaluated in the multi-ancestry Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) dataset and validated in several additional multi-ancestry cohorts. The PRS was significantly associated with AD in the ADSP EA, AA, CH, and Native American Hispanic groups with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) between 1.14 and 1.52 per standard deviation of the PRS. PRS performance was validated in the replication cohorts (ORs 1.21-1.65). The PRS was also associated with poorer memory, executive function, and language performance; greater AD-related neuropathological burden (including CERAD, Braak stage, and Thal phase scores); reduced hippocampal volume; lower CSF Aβ42; and elevated total tau and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), with stronger p-tau associations observed in women. Longitudinal analyses revealed that individuals in the highest PRS decile exhibited the steepest cognitive decline, particularly among those who progressed to AD. Our findings demonstrate the utility of an ancestry-aware and APOE-independent PRS for advancing understanding of the genetic basis of AD across diverse populations. Associations observed with early biological and cognitive changes and potential sex-specific differences support the incorporation of a PRS in clinical trials and personalized intervention and prevention strategies.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Polygenic scores for obstructive sleep apnoea reveal pathways contributing to cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common chronic condition, with obesity its strongest risk factor. Polygenic scores (PGSs) summarise the genetic liability to phenotype and can provide insights into relationships between phenotypes. Recently, large datasets that include genetic data and OSA status became available, providing an opportunity to utilise PGS approaches to study the genetic relationship between OSA and other phenotypes, while differentiating OSA-specific from obesity-specific genetic factors. METHODS: Using race/ethnic diverse samples from over 1.2 million individuals from the Million Veteran Program, FinnGen, TOPMed, All of Us (AoU), Geisinger's MyCode, MGB Biobank, and the Human Phenotype Project, we developed and assessed PGSs for OSA, both without (BMIunadjOSA-PGS) and with adjustment for the genetic contributions of BMI (BMIadjOSA-PGS). FINDINGS: Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for OSA per 1 standard deviation of the PGSs ranged from 1.38 to 2.75. The associations of BMIadjOSA- and BMIunadjOSA-PGSs with CVD outcomes in AoU shared both common and distinct patterns. Only BMIunadjOSA-PGS was associated with type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and coronary artery disease, while both BMIadjOSA- and BMIunadjOSA-PGSs were associated with hypertension and stroke. Sex stratified analyses revealed that BMIadjOSA-PGS association with hypertension was driven by females (OR = 1.1, p-value = 0.002, OR = 1.01 p-value = 0.2 in males). OSA PGSs were also associated with body fat measures with some sex-specific associations. INTERPRETATION: Distinct components of OSA genetic risk are related and independent of obesity. Sex-specific associations with body fat distribution measures may explain differing OSA risks and associations with cardiometabolic morbidities between sexes. FUNDING: R01AG080598.

Humans↗

PubMed2024

The expected polygenic risk score (ePRS) framework: an equitable metric for quantifying polygenetic risk via modeling of ancestral makeup.

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) depend on genetic ancestry due to differences in allele frequencies between ancestral populations. This leads to implementation challenges in diverse populations. We propose a framework to calibrate PRS based on ancestral makeup. We define a metric called "expected PRS" (ePRS), the expected value of a PRS based on one's global or local admixture patterns. We further define the "residual PRS" (rPRS), measuring the deviation of the PRS from the ePRS. Simulation studies confirm that it suffices to adjust for ePRS to obtain nearly unbiased estimates of the PRS-outcome association without further adjusting for PCs. Using the TOPMed dataset, the estimated effect size of the rPRS adjusting for the ePRS is similar to the estimated effect of the PRS adjusting for genetic PCs. Similarly, we applied the ePRS framework to six cardiovascular-related traits in the All of Us dataset, and the results are consistent with those from the TOPMed analysis. The ePRS framework can protect from population stratification in association analysis and provide an equitable strategy to quantify genetic risk across diverse populations.

Journal Article↗