Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Nisha Kanwar

Publications and source records attributed to Nisha Kanwar.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical and genetic characterization of constitutional MLH1 promoter hypermethylation: Implications for Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Constitutional MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (CMPH) is a relatively rare cause of Lynch syndrome. While most cases appear to be sporadic, some result from secondary epimutations, mainly caused by germline variants in the MLH1 promoter region. This study describes the clinical phenotype and genetic etiology of CMPH in the largest clinical cohort to date. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 422 individuals who underwent clinical CMPH testing. Promoter sequencing was used to identify the underlying variants. Long-read sequencing further characterized MLH1 promoter methylation. RESULTS: CMPH was identified in 15.6% of the study cohort participants. Of these, 63 exhibited clinical features consistent with Lynch syndrome. The most common associated cancers were colorectal cancer, followed by endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and sebaceous neoplasms. Mendelian inheritance of CMPH was observed in 5 families in the study cohort, indicating secondary epimutations. Promoter sequencing identified 8 unique germline variants, including 3 novel variants. Methylation analysis by long-read sequencing revealed mutant allele-specific promoter methylation for these variants. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide the most comprehensive review of the clinical phenotype associated with CMPH and highlight the significant contribution of promoter variants to its etiology. These results underscore the need to include the assessment of constitutional MLH1 promoter methylation for Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

Humans

From Diagnosis, Therapy Decision-Making to Genetic Risk Assessment: The Impact of ctDNA Testing on Comprehensive Cancer Management-A Case Report.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing is a minimally invasive alternative to tissue biopsy and is ideal for inaccessible tumors or limited samples. It captures tumor heterogeneity over time and different anatomic locations, unlike the static snapshot provided by a biopsy. In this report, we describe a 68-year-old female with an initial diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (a pancreas head mass with multiple bilateral lung nodules). Mutation profiling of the pancreatic mass biopsy using a comprehensive cancer next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel was unsuccessful due to insufficient tissue. Consequently, ctDNA testing using a pan-cancer NGS panel was performed, and an EGFR p.L858R variant at 2.15% was identified. Interestingly, this activating variant is highly specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which raised the possibility of a synchronous tumor unrelated to the pancreatic mass. Immunohistochemistry showed the EGFR variant in station 7 lymph nodes but not in pancreatic biopsy tissue, supporting the inference that the variant originated from the lung mass. Droplet digital PCR on the limited pancreatic biopsy identified a KRAS p.Q61 variant, which was absent by ctDNA testing, suggesting a pancreatic primary with low ctDNA levels. In addition to diagnosing a primary lung cancer, ctDNA testing guided treatment decisions. With a primary EGFR p.L858R-mutant NSCLC, osimertinib was administered, resulting in a partial response within 10 months. In addition, given the synchronous primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma, germline testing was performed, revealing a CDKN2A p.I49T variant consistent with melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome, prompting comprehensive cancer surveillance and familial testing. This case illustrates how ctDNA testing enabled a comprehensive evaluation by clarifying the diagnosis, identifying actionable biomarkers, and facilitating genetic risk assessment, ultimately having a significant impact on the patient's clinical management.

Humans