Biomedical subjects

Nicola Venturoli

Publications and source records attributed to Nicola Venturoli.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

A histopathologic screening method for rational use of organs from prostate-specific antigen-positive multiorgan donors: the Italian Emilia-Romagna Region experience.

Reduction of waiting-list length requires extension of the organ-donor pool to elderly males bearing an higher risk of prostate cancer incidence. Prostate-cancer screening in organ donors is currently based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays (total PSA and free/total PSA). However, the specificity of these assays is restricted, limiting risk-benefit analysis. Since 2001, 33 multiorgan donor candidates presenting within Emilia-Romagna (Italy) with suspect ultrasonography or abnormal PSA values were submitted to a histopathologic screening method of the entire prostate based on extemporary frozen-section analysis (maximum 1 hour) of over 50% of the organ at 0.1 mm cutting levels. Extemporary diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was made in 12 (36%) cases, corresponding to 4.5% of the male candidates aged more than 50 years in the donor pool. In all cases, the final diagnosis confirmed the extemporary analysis. As well as maximizing safety, this novel approach should permit more refined risk-benefit analysis.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

A multiorgan donor cancer screening protocol: the Italian Emilia-Romagna region experience.

BACKGROUND: We describe the Emilia-Romagna screening protocol for all multiorgan donors within this region of Italy and report on the first 2 years of implementation. SETTING: Setting is a 24-hour multidisciplinary call service covering the 16 intensive care units in Emilia-Romagna (3,969,000 inhabitants) and a centralised pathology center, directed by a transplant coordination center. STUDY POPULATION AND PERIOD: All 271 effective donor candidates presenting in Emilia-Romagna in 2001-2002. PROTOCOL: Anamnesis, external examination, and thorough laboratory and instrumental screening is followed by sampling of internal effusions and evaluation of all internal organs. All suspect findings are then investigated by extemporary pathologic evaluation. To fit national legal requirements, candidates are classified as standard risk (no transmissible risk); nonstandard risk (low-risk of transmission, eligibility restricted to certified clinical emergencies pending informed consent); and unacceptable risk (unconditional exclusion because of high-risk pathologies). RESULTS: The protocol was successfully implemented for all 271 candidates. In addition to 14 independent exclusions, clinical suspicion of cancer was raised for 61 donors presenting with 82 lesions or effusions. Along with one case of lymph-node tuberculosis (unacceptable risk), histocytologic screening revealed eight cases of malignancy (5 prostate, 1 papillary-thyroid, 1 follicular-thyroid, and 1 renal cell, all nonstandard risk); the remainder were benign (standard risk). Protocol implementation led to exclusion of 8 (3.0%) candidates (1 nonstandard risk transplantation was performed). CONCLUSIONS: This stringent protocol-now adopted with some modifications at a national level-provides an initial example of a feasible intervention aimed at maximising donation safety while rationalizing use of marginal donors.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Improving donor identification with the Donor Action programme.

The increasing demand for organs for transplantation entails a consensual need for enhancement of organ procurement activity. As organ donors reside mainly in hospital intensive care units (ICUs), the Donor Action programme is aimed at identifying critical areas in ICUs, in order to improve the first step of organ donation. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the problem of identification of potential donors by means of a chart revision of patients who died in 14 ICUs in the Emilia-Romagna region between 1 July 1998 and 31 December 2000. All deaths and patients with severe brain insult (score on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) = 3/15) were assessed by the local transplant coordinators together with a professional at the Transplant Reference Centre. Brain death diagnoses and potential donor referrals were therefore assessed in the study period, which was subdivided into five semesters. Of the 3,056 deaths reported in 30 months, 1,248 were due to severe brain damage (GCS score = 3). Brain death diagnosis (BD) was performed in 509 patients (40.8%). Although we applied the same parameters over the whole length of the study, we observed a significant increase in BDs (from 87 in the first semester to 125 in the last, 30.5% to 53.0% of the patients with GCS 3 ( P=0.003, chi(2) for trend=16.072), in spite of a slight decrease in the total number of deaths and in the total number of patients with GCS score = 3 (from 649 to 587, and from 44% to 41%, respectively). Study population characteristics could have contrasted with rather than facilitated our results: age and gender did not change significantly, whilst cause of death showed a significant reduction in trauma and an increase in cerebrovascular incidents over the whole length of the study. We can conclude that the more careful assessment of patients dying in ICUs, by the Donor Action programme, significantly contributed to the improvement of BDs observed in the study period. Therefore, Donor Action seems to be an efficient quality control programme to improve identification of potential donors, the first stage of organ procurement.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Donor Action program in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.

CONTEXT: The high demand for organs for transplantation necessitates enhancement of organ procurement activity worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To detect critical areas in the organ donation process and to assess whether careful monitoring of deaths in each intensive care unit could improve rates of identification of brain death. DESIGN: Records of patients who died in intensive care units in the Emilia-Romagna region between July 1, 1998 and June 30, 2000 were reviewed through the Donor Action program. RESULTS: Of the 2469 patients who died during the period studied, 1010 (40.9%) had severe brain damage, as indicated by a score of 3 on the Glasgow coma scale. A total of 857 patients with severe brain damage who had spent more than 6 hours in the intensive care unit (34.7% of all deaths) were considered as potential donors. Signs of brain death were observed in 383 (44.7%) of the 857 patients who died. Rates of identification of brain death increased from 36% to 55% during the study period. CONCLUSION: Considering that the characteristics of the study population had not changed, we believe that the Donor Action program was an important factor leading to the observed improvement in identification of brain death.

Adult↗