Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Nicholas P Restifo

Publications and source records attributed to Nicholas P Restifo.

64 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Natural selection of tumor variants in the generation of "tumor escape" phenotypes.

The idea that tumors must "escape" from immune recognition contains the implicit assumption that tumors can be destroyed by immune responses either spontaneously or as the result of immunotherapeutic intervention. Simply put, there is no need for tumor escape without immunological pressure. Here, we review evidence supporting the immune escape hypothesis and critically explore the mechanisms that may allow such escape to occur. We discuss the idea that the central engine for generating immunoresistant tumor cell variants is the genomic instability and dysregulation that is characteristic of the transformed genome. "Natural selection" of heterogeneous tumor cells results in the survival and proliferation of variants that happen to possess genetic and epigenetic traits that facilitate their growth and immune evasion. Tumor escape variants are likely to emerge after treatment with increasingly effective immunotherapies.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

MHC class I and class II presentation of tumor antigen in retrovirally and adenovirally transduced dendritic cells.

The unique antigen-presenting capabilities of dendritic cells (DCs) make them an attractive means with which to initiate an antitumor immune response. Using DCs transduced with tumor antigens for immunotherapy has several theoretical advantages over peptide-pulsed DCs including the possibility that transduced DCs are capable of presenting epitopes on both class I and class II MHC molecules. To test this theory, we inserted the human tumor antigen gp100 into mouse DCs transgenic for HLA-DRbeta1*0401 using either adenoviral vector or a VSV-G pseudotyped retroviral vector. DCs transduced with tumor antigen were able to be recognized by both a murine CD8(+) T-cell clone and a murine CD4(+) T-cell line in a cytokine release assay, thereby demonstrating presentation of both MHC class I and class II gp100 epitopes. This study describes the simultaneous presentation of a tumor-associated antigen to both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and lends support to the use of gene-modified DCs as a means to initiate both CD4(+) and CD8(+) antitumor responses.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Induction of CD4(+) T cell-dependent antitumor immunity by TAT-mediated tumor antigen delivery into dendritic cells.

Dendritic cell-based (DC-based) immunotherapy represents a promising approach to the prevention and treatment of many diseases, including cancer, but current strategies have met with only limited success in clinical and preclinical studies. Previous studies have demonstrated that a TAT peptide derived from the HIV TAT protein has the ability to transduce peptides or proteins into various cells. Here, we describe the use of TAT-mediated delivery of T cell peptides into DCs to prolong antigen presentation and enhance T cell responses. While immunization of mice with DCs pulsed with an antigenic peptide derived from the human TRP2 protein generated partial protective immunity against B16 tumor, immunization with DCs loaded with a TAT-TRP2 peptide resulted in complete protective immunity, as well as significant inhibition of lung metastases in a 3-day tumor model. Although both DC/TRP2 and DC/TAT-TRP2 immunization increased the number of TRP2-specific CD8(+) T cells detected by K(b)/TRP2 tetramers, T cell activity elicited by DC/TAT-TRP2 was three- to tenfold higher than that induced by DC/TRP2. Furthermore, both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells were required for antitumor immunity demonstrated by experiments with antibody depletion of subsets of T cells, as well as with various knockout mice. These results suggest that a TAT-mediated antigen delivery system may have important clinical applications for cancer therapy.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Do CD4+ CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells hinder tumor immunotherapy?

After years of banishment from mainstream immunology, the notion that one subset of T cells can exert regulatory effects on other T lymphocytes is back in fashion. Recent work in knockout and transgenic mice has begun to bring molecular definition to our understanding of immunoregulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells (Treg/Th3/Tr1). The identification of the glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor family-related gene (GITR, also known as TNFRSF18) expressed on T regulatory cells might afford new therapeutic opportunities. Another possible therapeutic intervention could be the blockade of signaling through the molecular pair of tumor necrosis factor-related activation induced cytokine (TRANCE) and receptor activator of NF-kappaB (RANK). Based on the available evidence from experimental mouse tumor models, however, it seems that simply blocking or even eliminating T regulatory function will not be enough to manage established tumors. The challenge for immunotherapists now is to overcome immunosuppression using the knowledge gained through the understanding of T regulatory cell function.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immunization of patients with metastatic melanoma using both class I- and class II-restricted peptides from melanoma-associated antigens.

Cancer vaccines targeting CD8+ T cells have been successful in eliciting immunologic responses but disappointing in inducing clinical responses. Strong evidence supports the importance of CD4+ T cells in "helping" cytotoxic CD8+ cells in antitumor immunity. We report here on two consecutive clinical trials evaluating the impact of immunization with both human leukocyte antigen class I- and class II-restricted peptides from the gp100 melanoma antigen. In Protocol 1, 22 patients with metastatic melanoma were immunized with two modified class I A*0201-restricted peptides, gp100:209-217(210M) and MART-1:26-35(27L). In Protocol 2, 19 patients received the same class I-restricted peptides in combination with a class II DRB1*0401-restricted peptide, gp100:44-59. As assessed by in vitro sensitization assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) against the native gp100:209-217 peptide, 95% of patients in Protocol 1 were successfully immunized after two vaccinations in contrast to 50% of patients in Protocol 2 (P(2) < 0.005). Furthermore, the degree of sensitization was significantly lower in patients in Protocol 2 (P = 0.01). Clinically, one patient in Protocol 2 had an objective response, and none did in Protocol 1. Thus, the addition of the class II-restricted peptide gp100:44-59 did not improve clinical response but might have diminished the immunologic response of circulating PBMC to the class I-restricted peptide gp100:209-217. The reasons for this decreased immune reactivity are unclear but may involve increased CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell activity, increased apoptosis of activated CD8+ T cells, or the trafficking of sensitized CD8+ reactive cells out of the peripheral blood. Moreover, the sequential, nonrandomized nature of patient enrollment for the two trials may account for the differences in immunologic response.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cell transfer therapy for cancer: lessons from sequential treatments of a patient with metastatic melanoma.

The development of effective autologous cell transfer therapies for the treatment of patients with cancer has been difficult, in part because the cells used to treat each patient are different, as are the patient's tumor and immune status. Much can thus be learned by sequential treatments of the same patient with the same cells, making single modifications in the treatments to determine which factors are critical. The authors have treated a single patient with five sequential administrations of the same cells with minor modifications in the mode of administration and the immune status of the patient. The treatment of this patient strongly suggested that 1) the highly avid recognition of tumor antigens in vitro by a transferred lymphocyte population does not necessarily predict in vivo antitumor activity; 2) the administration of highly avid antitumor autologous lymphocyte populations can be far more active in mediating tumor regression in vivo when administered after nonmyeloablative chemotherapy than when administered without this prior chemotherapy; 3) intra-arterial administration of highly avid antitumor autologous lymphocytes into the blood supply of the tumor can be more effective in mediating tumor regression than the intravenous administration of these same tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; 4) one mechanism of tumor escape from immunotherapy is loss of class I MHC antigen expression by the tumor due to mutation of the beta-2 microglobulin gene.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells, immunotherapy of cancer, and interleukin-2.

CD4+CD25+ T regulatory (Treg) cells control immunologic tolerance to self-antigens and play a role in suppressing antitumor immune responses, but the mechanism of suppression in vivo remains uncertain. Recently, signaling through the high-affinity interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor has been shown to be critical for Treg cell differentiation and survival in vivo. Mice deficient in IL-2 or its receptor (CD25 or CD122) or deficient in downstream signaling molecules, including JAK-3 and STAT-5, do not develop a stable population of Treg cells and subsequently acquire lymphoproliferative disease and autoimmunity. in vitro, IL-2 is required to expand Treg cells and to induce their suppressive characteristics. Conversely, IL-2-based regimens can activate cellular antitumor immunity and are the mainstay of immunotherapies directed against melanoma and kidney cancers. Given the seemingly disparate effects of IL-2, the authors discuss the possibility that IL-2 may not be the optimal T-cell growth factor in vivo, but rather an inducer of self-tolerance. The authors propose that other gamma c-signaling cytokines, including IL-15, may be alternative choices for the immunotherapy of cancer.

Adoptive Transfer↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Glucocorticoids do not inhibit antitumor activity of activated CD8+ T cells.

Glucocorticoids are potent immunosuppressive drugs that are generally withheld from cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. We sought to test the hypothesis that glucocorticoids might interfere with the function of cells after adoptive transfer. We gave dexamethasone, a potent synthetic glucocorticoid, to B16 melanoma-bearing mice receiving the adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of pmel-1 T-cell receptor transgenic CD8+ cells. Dexamethasone caused a profound lymphodepletion but, surprisingly, did not alter the antitumor efficacy of ACT-based regimens whether given before, during, or after ACT. Although dexamethasone radically decreased the number of native CD8+ splenocytes in recipient mice, it did not affect the numbers of CD8+ pmel-1 cells derived from ACT in these mice. In vitro proliferation assays revealed acute inhibition of naive pmel-1 CD8+ cells by dexamethasone without significant effect on activated cells. In vitro interferon (IFN)-gamma release from activated pmel-1 CD8+ cells showed partial inhibition by dexamethasone, but this effect was relatively minor when compared with the near-complete inhibition of naive cells. Thus, glucocorticoids had a profound inhibitory effect on naive CD8+ T cells but had little impact on the proliferation and function of activated CD8+ pmel-1 T cells. Finally, because glucocorticoids had no effect on tumor regression in this model, it may be possible to use glucocorticoids in some patients receiving ACT-based immunotherapy regimens.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Altered CD8(+) T-cell responses when immunizing with multiepitope peptide vaccines.

Efforts to develop effective cancer vaccines often use combinations of immunogenic peptides to increase the applicability and effectiveness of the immunizations. The immunologic consequences of combining more than 1 self/tumor antigen in a single vaccine emulsion remain unclear, however. We performed 2 sequential clinical trials in patients at high risk for melanoma recurrence. Patients were given the highly immunogenic gp100:209-217(210M) peptide and the less immunogenic tyrosinase:368-376(370D) peptide once every 3 weeks for 4 weeks. This vaccination course was 12 weeks long, and patients were vaccinated for up to 4 courses (16 total vaccinations). In the first trial in 31 patients, the peptides were emulsified separately in incomplete Freund adjuvant and injected at 2 different sites. In the second trial in 33 patients, the peptides were emulsified together and injected at the same site. Cryopreserved lymphocytes were obtained by apheresis after each course and were evaluated for antipeptide activity using tetramer, enzyme-linked immunospot, and in vitro sensitization boost assays. When the peptides were injected at separate sites, robust specific reactivity to the native gp100:209-217 peptide was measured by each of the assays, whereas immunization with the tyrosinase:368-376(370D) peptide was far less effective. When the peptides were emulsified and injected together at the same site, immunization to the gp100:209-217(210M) epitope dropped precipitously, whereas reactivity to the tyrosinase:368-376(370D) peptide was enhanced. These cautionary data indicate that mixing peptides in the same emulsion can alter reactivity compared with peptides injected separately by mechanisms that may include the induction of localized nonspecific inflammation or competitive binding of peptides to major histocompatibility complex molecules.

Adult↗