Clinical outcomes of fusion vs excision in the treatment of painful type II accessory naviculars: A matched cohort study.
BACKGROUND: For painful Type II accessory naviculars, whether to remove or fuse them remains unclear based on the current literature. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of fusion versus excision in treating painful type II accessory naviculars. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included and followed 54 eligible patients (from May 2017 to March 2023). After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 34 patients (17 fusion versus 17 excision) were analyzed. Outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score, Tegner score, complication rates, and radiographic measurements. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the appropriate accessory navicular size cutoff for predicting nonunion following fusion. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 35.0 ± 9.9 months. The fusion and excision groups showed significant and comparable VAS and AOFAS score improvements (p < .001). The fusion group had a higher complication rate (41.2% vs. 5.9%, p = .039), primarily nonunion and persistent pain. ROC curve analysis identified 50.3 mm² as the cutoff for nonunion risk; sizes < 50.3 mm² predicted high nonunion likelihood. CONCLUSIONS: Both fusion and excision are effective treatments for painful type II accessory naviculars, demonstrating acceptable pain and functional improvement during midterm follow-up. However, the lower complication rate along with relatively superior functional recovery favors the excision technique. For accessory naviculars smaller than 50.3 mm2, excision may be a better choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.