Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Neil T Parkin

Publications and source records attributed to Neil T Parkin.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification of alternative amino acid substitutions in drug-resistant variants of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

OBJECTIVE/DESIGN: To identify new drug-resistance-associated mutations in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) protein, we screened the RT sequence database of our hospital for alternative amino acid substitutions at known RT drug-resistance positions. METHOD: The genotypic database used for this analysis contained 1322 RT sequences from 1015 patients. We analysed this RT database with a focus on alternative mutations at RT positions known to be involved in drug resistance. The patterns of drug resistance associated with these alternative mutations were investigated in a separate database containing genotype and drug-susceptibility results. RESULTS: We identified multiple alternative resistance-associated mutations at amino acid positions 44, 62, 67, 69, 70, 74, 75, 103, 181, 190, 210, and 219 in RT. Phenotypic analysis indicated that drug-resistance properties of the alternative Y181V and L74I mutants are similar, but not identical, to that of the well-known Y181C and L74V mutations. CONCLUSION: This initial survey indicates that many resistance-associated phenomena can be distilled from existing data. These findings endorse a more extensive analysis by computerized methods.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

The K101P and K103R/V179D mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase confer resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Genotypic patterns associated with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance in the absence of well-characterized resistance mutations were identified using a database (n > 47,000) of phenotype-genotype data. Among samples with no known NNRTI mutations, the most resistant samples contained K101P (n = 35) or a combination of K103R and V179D (n = 41). Site-directed mutagenesis confirmed the importance of these mutations.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

HIV type 1 fitness evolution in antiretroviral-experienced patients with sustained CD4+ T cell counts but persistent virologic failure.

BACKGROUND: Over recent years, treatment guidelines for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection have evolved from monotherapy to combination regimens that include > or = 3 active drugs, resulting in a sharp decrease in morbidity and mortality. In the present article, we evaluated changes in HIV type 1 viral fitness associated with the sequential introduction of antiretroviral treatment strategies in 4 chronically infected patients with sustained CD4 cell count despite having a persistently detectable viral load. METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained before and during treatment to construct recombinant virus containing the 3'-end of gag, the protease and the reverse-transcriptase coding region. Drug susceptibility phenotype was evaluated with a panel of multiple reverse-transcriptase and protease inhibitors. Replicative capacity (RC) and infectivity were measured, and production of p24 was monitored after transfection. RESULTS: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) viruses selected during long-term antiretroviral therapy were less fit and infectious than their wild-type or monotherapy-selected counterparts, with the exception of viruses recovered from patient B. In 3 of 4 cases, p24 kinetics after transfection showed a delay in viral production of recombinant viruses containing MDR mutations. Data from the RC and infectivity assays showed good correlation (P < .03) and corroborated the p24 kinetics data. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that accumulation of MDR mutations during long-term antiretroviral treatment results, albeit not in all cases, in reductions of viral fitness.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Phenotypic hypersusceptibility to multiple protease inhibitors and low replicative capacity in patients who are chronically infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Increased susceptibility to the protease inhibitors saquinavir and amprenavir has been observed in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with specific mutations in protease (V82T and N88S). Increased susceptibility to ritonavir has also been described in some viruses from antiretroviral agent-naive patients with primary HIV-1 infection in association with combinations of amino acid changes at polymorphic sites in the protease. Many of the viruses displaying increased susceptibility to protease inhibitors also had low replication capacity. In this retrospective study, we analyze the drug susceptibility phenotype and the replication capacity of virus isolates obtained at the peaks of viremia during five consecutive structured treatment interruptions in 12 chronically HIV-1-infected patients. Ten out of 12 patients had at least one sample with protease inhibitor hypersusceptibility (change </=0.4-fold) to one or more protease inhibitor. Hypersusceptibility to different protease inhibitors was observed at variable frequency, ranging from 38% to amprenavir to 11% to nelfinavir. Pairwise comparisons between susceptibilities for the protease inhibitors showed a consistent correlation among all pairs. There was also a significant relationship between susceptibility to protease inhibitors and replication capacity in all patients. Replication capacity remained stable over the course of repetitive cycles of structured treatment interruptions. We could find no association between in vitro replication capacity and in vivo plasma viral load doubling time and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell counts at each treatment interruption. Several mutations were associated with hypersusceptibility to each protease inhibitor in a univariate analysis. This study extends the association between hypersusceptibility to protease inhibitors and low replication capacity to virus isolated from chronically infected patients and highlights the complexity of determining the genetic basis of this phenomenon. The potential clinical relevance of protease inhibitor hypersusceptibility and low replication capacity to virologic response to protease inhibitor-based therapies deserves to be investigated further.

Carbamates↗

In vitro activity of SPD754, a new deoxycytidine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), against 215 HIV-1 isolates resistant to other NRTIs.

SPD754 (also known as AVX-754) is a deoxycytidine analogue nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) with antiretroviral activity against HIV-1 and HIV-2 in vitro and against recombinant viruses containing thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs). In order to better establish the activity of SPD754 against HIV-1 containing TAMs, twelve panels of up to twenty clinical isolates with defined TAM combinations were selected from the ViroLogic database. Phenotypic viral susceptibility to SPD754 and five other NRTIs was tested using the PhenoSense HIV assay and expressed as median fold-change compared with a reference strain. In total, 215 isolates were selected, representing four TAM patterns in both pathways by which TAMs accumulate clinically. The presence of five TAMs in the 41, 215 pathway, at codons 41, 67, 210, 215, and 219 of reverse transcriptase (RT), produced a median 1.8-fold reduction in SPD754 susceptibility, compared with fold reductions to zidovudine, lamivudine, abacavir, didanosine and tenofovir of 438, 4.8, 4.5, 1.4 and 3.6, respectively. Five TAMs in the 67, 70, 219 pathway (at codons 41, 67, 70, 215 and 219) reduced SPD754 susceptibility by a median 1.3-fold, compared with fold reductions for the aforementioned NRTIs of 108, 3.2, 3.0, 1.3 and 2.5, respectively. M184V addition reduced SPD754 susceptibility by 1.8-fold in the presence or absence of TAMs. SPD754 retains a substantial proportion of its antiviral activity against HIV-1 containing multiple TAMs, with or without the M184V mutation. These data suggest that SPD754 is a promising new NRTI for the treatment of NRTI-experienced HIV-infected patients.

Deoxycytidine↗

Evidence for positive epistasis in HIV-1.

Reproductive strategies such as sexual reproduction and recombination that involve the shuffling of parental genomes for the production of offspring are ubiquitous in nature. However, their evolutionary benefit remains unclear. Many theories have identified potential benefits, but progress is hampered by the scarcity of relevant data. One class of theories is based on the assumption that mutations affecting fitness exhibit negative epistasis. Retroviruses recombine frequently and thus provide a unique opportunity to test these theories. Using amino acid sequence data and fitness values from 9466 human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) isolates, we find in contrast to these theories strong statistical evidence for a predominance of positive epistasis in HIV-1.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Mutation D30N is not preferentially selected by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C in the development of resistance to nelfinavir.

Differences in baseline polymorphisms between subtypes may result in development of diverse mutational pathways during antiretroviral treatment. We compared drug resistance in patients with human immunodeficiency virus subtype C (referred to herein as "subtype-C-infected patients") versus subtype-B-infected patients following protease inhibitor (PI) therapy. Genotype, phenotype, and replication capacity (Phenosense; Virologic) were determined. We evaluated 159 subtype-C- and 65 subtype-B-infected patients failing first PI treatment. Following nelfinavir treatment, the unique nelfinavir mutation D30N was substantially less frequent in C (7%) than in B (23%; P = 0.03) while L90M was similar (P < 0.5). Significant differences were found in the rates of M36I (98 and 36%), L63P (35 and 59%), A71V (3 and 32%), V77I (0 and 36%), and I93L (91 and 32%) (0.0001 < P < 0.05) in C and B, respectively. Other mutations were L10I/V, K20R, M46I, V82A/I, I84V, N88D, and N88S. Subtype C samples with mutation D30N showed a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) change in susceptibility to nelfinavir only. Other mutations increased IC(50) correlates to all PIs. Following accumulation of mutations, replication capacity of the C virus was reduced from 43% +/- 22% to 22% +/- 15% (P = 0.04). We confirmed the selective nature of the D30N mutation in C, and the broader cross-resistance of other common protease inhibitor mutations. The rates at which these mutational pathways develop differ in C and subtype-B-infected patients failing therapy, possibly due to the differential impact of baseline polymorphisms. Because mutation D30N is not preferentially selected in nelfinavir-treated subtype-C-infected patients, as it is in those infected with subtype B, the consideration of using this drug initially to preserve future protease inhibitor options is less relevant for subtype-C-infected patients.

Cohort Studies↗

Antiretroviral drug resistance in non-subtype B HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV.

Patients infected with HIV-1 of subtype other than B ('non-subtype B') or with HIV-2 are being treated with antiretroviral drugs in increasing numbers. In addition, healthcare providers and laboratory workers working with clinical specimens or animals infected with HIV, SIV or SHIV are at risk of being exposed to the virus and might require post-exposure prophylactic treatment. Thus, it is important to understand the inherent antiviral susceptibility of non-subtype B HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV to currently available antiretroviral drugs, which have been developed with subtype B HIV-1-infected patients as the primary target population. In addition, knowledge about the consequences of treatment failure in non-subtype B HIV-1- and HIV-2-infected patients, with respect to the development of drug resistance, is crucial for designing optimal treatment strategies. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge in these areas. Non-subtype B group M HIV-1 appears to be susceptible to available agents, but follows several unique pathways to resistance to some drugs that have important clinical implications. Group O HIV-1 is naturally resistant to the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). HIV-2 and SIVsm are also naturally resistant to the NNRTIs as well as the protease inhibitor amprenavir. More research into the clinical responses to existing drugs and interpretation of genotypic information is needed, as well as development of diagnostic assays specific for non-subtype B HIV-1 and HIV-2.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Mechanistic basis for reduced viral and enzymatic fitness of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase containing both K65R and M184V mutations.

HIV-1 drug resistance mutations are often inversely correlated with viral fitness, which remains poorly described at the molecular level. Some resistance mutations can also suppress resistance caused by other resistance mutations. We report the molecular mechanisms by which a virus resistant to lamivudine with the M184V reverse transcriptase mutation shows increased susceptibility to tenofovir and can suppress the effects of the tenofovir resistance mutation K65R. Additionally, we report how the decreased viral replication capacity of resistant viruses is directly linked to their decreased ability to use natural nucleotide substrates and that combination of the K65R and M184V resistance mutations leads to greater decreases in viral replication capacity. All together, these results define at the molecular level how nucleoside-resistant viruses can be driven to reduced viral fitness.

Adenine↗

Broad nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor cross-resistance in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clinical isolates.

Nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are important components of most antiretroviral combination treatment regimens. Using a large collection of clinical isolates, we characterized patterns of cross-resistance among all NRTIs. Drugs were grouped by the effect of the M184V mutation: susceptibility to group 1 drugs (zidovudine, stavudine, tenofovir, and adefovir) increased when M184V was present, whereas susceptibility to group 2 drugs (didanosine, zalcitabine, abacavir, and lamivudine) decreased. Significant cross-resistance was observed among all NRTIs and was most notable when samples with or without M184V were analyzed separately. An increasing number of thymidine-analogue mutations (TAMs) was associated with a progressive reduction in drug susceptibility for all NRTIs. The modulating effect of M184I/V on drug susceptibility was present regardless of the number of TAMs. The broad range of susceptibility observed for viruses containing the same number of TAMs indicates that the genetic correlates of NRTI resistance remain to be fully elucidated.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Improving lopinavir genotype algorithm through phenotype correlations: novel mutation patterns and amprenavir cross-resistance.

BACKGROUND: Current genotypic algorithms suggest that the HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PI) lopinavir (LPV) and amprenavir (APV) have distinct resistance profiles. However, phenotypic data indicate that cross-resistance is more common than expected. METHODS: Protease genotype (GT) and phenotype (PT) from 1418 patient viruses with reduced PI susceptibility and/or resistance-associated mutations (training data) were analyzed. Samples were classified as LPV resistant by GT (GT-R) if six or more LPV mutations were present, and by PT (PT-R) if the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) fold-change (FC) was over 10. RESULTS: There were 182 samples (13%) that were GT-S but PT-R for LPV. A comparison of the mutation prevalence in PT-R/GT-S samples with that in PT-S/GT-S samples identified mutations associated with LPV PT-R. Several previously defined LPV mutations were found to have a stronger than average effect (e.g., M46I/L, I54V/T, V82A/F), and new variants at known positions (e.g., I54A/M/S, V82S) were identified. Other mutations, including known APV resistance mutations, were found to contribute to reduced LPV susceptibility. A new LPV genotypic interpretation algorithm was constructed that improved overall genotypic/phenotypic concordance from 80% to 91%. The algorithm demonstrated a concordance rate of 90% when tested on 523 new samples. Cross-resistance between APV and LPV was greater in samples with primary APV resistance mutations than in those lacking them. CONCLUSIONS: The current LPV mutation score does not fully account for many resistant viruses. Consequently, cross-resistance between LPV and APV is underappreciated. Phenotypic results from large and diverse patient virus populations should be used to guide the development of more accurate GT interpretation algorithms.

Algorithms↗