Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Nathalie Beaujean

Publications and source records attributed to Nathalie Beaujean.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Epigenetic marks in cloned rhesus monkey embryos: comparison with counterparts produced in vitro.

Until now, no primate animals have been successfully cloned to birth with somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) procedures, and little is known about the molecular events that occurred in the reconstructed embryos during preimplantation development. In many SCNT cases, epigenetic reprogramming of the donor nuclei after transfer into enucleated oocytes was hypothesized to be crucial to the reestablishment of embryonic totipotency. In the present study, we focused on two major epigenetic marks, DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) acetylation, which we examined by indirect immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy. During preimplantation development, 67% of two-cell- and 50% of eight-cell-cloned embryos showed higher DNA methylation levels than their in vitro fertilization (IVF) counterparts, which undergo gradual demethylation until the early morula stage. Moreover, whereas an asymmetric distribution of DNA methylation was established in an IVF blastocysts with a lower methylation level in the inner cell mass (ICM) than in the trophectoderm, in most cloned blastocysts, ICM cells maintained a high degree of methylation. Finally, two donor cell lines (S11 and S1-04) that showed a higher level of H3K9 acetylation supported more blastocyst formation after nuclear transfer than the other cell line (S1-03), with a relatively low level of acetylation staining. In conclusion, we propose that abnormal DNA methylation patterns contribute to the poor quality of cloned preimplantation embryos and may be one of the obstacles to successful cloning in primates.

Acetylation↗
PubMed2006

Genome restructuring in mouse embryos during reprogramming and early development.

Although a growing number of studies investigates functional genome organization in somatic cell nuclei, it is largely unknown how mammalian genome organization is established during embryogenesis. To address this question, we investigated chromo center formation and the peculiar arrangements of chromosome domains in early mouse embryos. At the one-cell stage, we observed characteristic arrangements of chromosomes and chromo center components. Subsequently, starting with the burst of zygotic genome transcription major rearrangements led to the establishment of somatic type chromo centers with a defined spatio-temporal organization. These processes appeared to be completed at the blastocyst stage with the onset of cell differentiation. During the same developmental period, a fraction of pericentric heterochromatin that was late replicating in the first cycle underwent switches in replication timing, spatial organization and epigenetic marks. Cloning experiments revealed that the genome organization typical for more advanced stages was quickly reverted into the one-cell stage-specific form after nuclear transfer, supporting the idea that reprogramming associated genome remodeling in normal and cloned embryos is determined by cytoplasmic factors. Together, the results suggest that distinct but characteristic forms of nuclear genome organization are required for genome reprogramming in early embryos and for proper regulation of differential gene expression patterns at later stages.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Architectural reorganization of the nuclei upon transfer into oocytes accompanies genome reprogramming.

The ability of cloned embryos to sustain full-term development depends on the ability of the recipient ooplasm to reprogram the donor cell genome. As the nuclear architecture has recently emerged as a key-factor in the regulation of gene expression, we questioned whether early embryos obtained from transfer of ES metaphasic chromosomes into mouse ooplasm would adopt the somatic or embryonic type of nuclear organization. We have particularly focused on the arrangement of chromosomal territories with respect to the nucleolar compartment, and the pericentric heterochromatin domains called chromocenters. We found that nuclear transfer triggers profound chromatin rearrangements including the dispersion of the donor cell chromocenters components. These rearrangements lead to a typical 1-cell pronuclear organization, namely a radial arrangement of the chromosome territories with centromeres attached to the nucleoli, which adopt the compact fibrillar structure of nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs). Subsequently, during the second cycle, the cloned embryos undergo further reorganization with the establishment of new chromocenters, clustered in one part of the nucleus, as during normal embryogenesis. We could also establish that the adequate distribution of chromosomal territories at the pronuclear stage seems important for the development until blastocyst.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

[Reprogramming and epigenesis].

The fact that the nucleus of a differentiated somatic cell can be reprogrammed in order to sustain embryonic development is now well established. Experiments of somatic cell nuclear transfer (cloning) have proved that a foreign nucleus introduced into an enucleated oocyte can give rise to physiologically normal offsprings, with a normal lifespan. Such evidence of genome expression plasticity is also observed experimentally with heterokaryons, created by the fusion or the nuclear transfer between two somatic cells, where differentiated nuclei are able to express genes characteristic of the host cell. However, the epigenetic mechanisms that permit nuclear plasticity remain poorly understood. In this paper we present the main evidences showing important modifications of the large scale organisation of chromosomal domains and of the DNA methylation pattern upon nuclear transfer and during the first cleavages. These modifications of epigenetic marks, brought by an intimate contact between the chromatin and the recipient oocyte cytoplasmic factors, appear essential for further development. They are established over the first cell cycles of development. The onset of embryonic genome activation and the first cellular differentiation events that occur over the implantation period are two additional check-points of reprogramming that appear to be also highly dependent on epigenetic alterations. Beyond those stages, defective placental functions might be directly responsible for the fetal and postnatal physiopathologies frequently observed in cloned animals. No direct link between preimplantation reprogramming defaults, placental dysfunctions and low development to term has been established yet. The epigenetics studies which are now used to characterise loci specific and probably genotype dependent alterations in cloned animals of different species will provide invaluable help to define the role of epigenesis in the achievement of a developmental program.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

The effect of interspecific oocytes on demethylation of sperm DNA.

In contrast to mice, in sheep no genome-wide demethylation of the paternal genome occurs within the first postfertilization cell cycle. This difference could be due either to an absence of a sheep demethylase activity that is present in mouse ooplasm or to an increased protection of methylated cytosine residues in sheep sperm. Here, we use interspecies intracytoplasmic sperm injection to demonstrate that sheep sperm DNA can be demethylated in mouse oocytes. Surprisingly, mouse sperm can also be demethylated to a limited extent in sheep oocytes. Our results suggest that the murine demethylation process is facilitated either by a sperm-derived factor or by male pronuclear chromatin composition.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Effect of limited DNA methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Active demethylation of cytosine residues in the sperm genome before forming a functional zygotic nucleus is thought to be an important function of the oocyte cytoplasm for subsequent embryonic development in the mouse. Conversely, this event does not occur in the sheep or rabbit zygote and occurs only partially in the cow. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of limited methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on reprogramming somatic nuclei. Sheep fibroblast somatic nuclei were partially demethylated after electrofusion with recipient sheep oocytes and undergo a stepwise passive loss of DNA methylation during early development, as determined by 5-methylcytosine immunostaining on interphase embryonic nuclei. A similar decrease takes place with in vivo-derived sheep embryos up to the eight-cell stage, although nuclear transfer embryos exhibit a consistently higher level of methylation at each stage. Between the eight-cell and blastocyst stages, DNA methylation levels in nuclear transfer embryos are comparable with those derived in vivo, but the distribution of methylated DNA is abnormal in a high proportion. By correlating DNA methylation with developmental potential at individual stages, our results suggest that somatic nuclei that do not undergo rapid reorganization of their DNA before the first mitosis fail to develop within two to three cell cycles and that the observed methylation defects in early cleavage stages more likely occur as a direct consequence of failed nuclear reorganization than in failed demethylation capacity. However, because only embryos with reorganized chromatin appear to survive the 16-cell and morula stages, failure to demethylate the trophectoderm cells of the blastocyst is likely to directly impact on developmental potential by altering programmed patterns of gene expression in extra-embryonic tissues. Thus, both remodeling of DNA and epigenetic reprogramming appear critical for development of both fertilized and nuclear transfer embryos.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Fundamental features of chromatin structure.

Which mechanisms regulate nuclear plasticity? Part of the answer to that question lies in understanding how genes are expressed and regulated in the context of chromatin structure. It is now clear that the genes are regulated in discrete and controlled stages, from packaging into chromatin to their localization within the nucleus. Whereas the genetic information provides the framework for the manufacture of all proteins necessary to create a living cell, chromatin structure controls how, where, and when the genetic information should be used. In this minireview, I summarize the main characteristics of chromatin structure and highlight some of the modifications usually associated with the regulation of gene expression.

Acetylation↗