Biomedical subjects

Nasser Albqami

Publications and source records attributed to Nasser Albqami.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Indications and contraindications for the use of laparoscopic surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

Surgery remains the only treatment with a chance of cure for renal cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) has developed to be a standard treatment for the management of suspected renal malignancy in many centers worldwide, with oncologic efficacy equal to that of open radical nephrectomy. LRN has considerable advantages over open surgery, such as decreased postoperative morbidity, decreased analgesic requirements, and shorter hospital stay and convalescence. Current indications for LRN include all patients with localized stage T1-2 renal tumors. LRN for stage T3 renal tumors may be technically feasible in individual situations, but cannot be considered standard treatment. Open radical nephrectomy is reserved for advanced renal tumors, according to the surgeon's judgment. Partial nephrectomy is well established and considered to be the standard management for all organ-confined tumors of <or=4 cm in diameter. The scope of partial nephrectomy, however, is expanding, and now includes patients with organ-confined renal tumors of <or=7 cm. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a continuously evolving technique. Continuing developments allow the experienced laparoscopist to use laparoscopic surgery for virtually all patients who are eligible for elective partial nephrectomy. This review evaluates the current indications and contraindications for laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery: evolution in a decade.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience with laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery (NSS) over a decade. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients underwent NSS since 1994. Two techniques were used-partial nephrectomy without ischemia (group 1) in 29 patients, and with ischemia (group 2) which was in cold or warm ischemia in 24 and 25 patients respectively. The mean tumour size was 1.97 and 2.2 cm in groups 1 and 2 respectively. Renal reconstruction evolved in our hands during this period. We changed many technical details and now we depend more on clips for securing the sutures rather than free hand knotting. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 162 and 216 minutes in groups 1 and 2 respectively. Mean ischemia time for patients with cold and warm ischemia was 44.9 and 33.8 minutes respectively. 3 patients in group 2 were converted to open surgery. Mean blood loss was 254 and 212 ml for group 1 and 2 respectively with two major bleedings in group 2. Minor intra-operative complication occurred in 3 patients, and major and minor postoperative complication in 15 patients. At a mean follow-up of 23.9 and 12.2 months for groups 1 and 2 respectively there was no recurrence. CONCLUSION: Warm and cold ischemia have widened the indications for laparoscopic NSS to more complex tumours and allow renal reconstruction with acceptable complication rate.

Female↗

PubMed2005

Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: single-center experience and review of literature.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopy can be an alternative modality in the management of renal stones. We present our experience with laparoscopic renal stone surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients (4 males, 14 females) with mean age of 51 years (range 18-86 years) underwent 19 laparoscopic procedures. The mean stone number and size, excluding five patients who had nephrectomy/heminephrectomy, were 1.9 (range 1-5) and 1.3 cm (range 0.5-4.5 cm), respectively. Three patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent pyeloplasty and concomitant pyelolithotomy. Three patients with upper-pole caliceal-diverticular stones had nephrolithotomy and fulguration of the diverticular mucosa. Three patients with stones and hydrocalix with scarred cortex had partial nephrectomy, two under cold and one under warm ischemia. Five patients, including one with a horseshoe kidney (who had one procedure on each kidney), had pyelolithotomy as an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patients with stones in a nonfunctioning kidney underwent nephrectomy (three patients) or heminephrectomy (one patient). RESULTS: All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The operative time was variable depending on the complexity of the procedures, from 115 minutes for Fengerplasty to 315 minutes for partial nephrectomy under cold ischemia (mean 178 minutes). The estimated blood loss was 53.2 mL (range 20-120 ml), and none of the patients received a blood transfusion. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 93% of the procedures. The mean hospital stay was 10.5 days (range 5-35 days). Three patients needed temporary pigtail-catheter drainage for obstruction after pyelolithotomy. One patient with a solitary kidney and infected staghorn calculus had prolonged urinary leak, which stopped with conservative management. One nephrectomy for nephrocutaneous fistula was complicated by a late colonic perforation necessitating colostomy. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is effective for complex renal stones and allows for adjunctive procedures. It can also be an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. It complements other minimally invasive procedures, and a need for open stone surgery should be rare in the future.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review defines the current role, indications, contraindications, advances, complications, and outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the management of renal tumors. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent publications have widened the scope for the application of this technology. The new advances in the management of renal tumors and the tools for tumor excision, renal parenchymal reconstruction, hemostasis, renal vascular control to establish renal ischemia, and the ability to avoid positive surgical margins have made the procedure safe and feasible in the hands of an experienced laparoscopist. SUMMARY: The trend toward nephron-sparing surgery has become stronger even in the presence of normal contralateral functioning kidney. Data on oncologic efficacy are promising, and partial nephrectomy is becoming a standard therapy for renal tumors less than 4 cm in size in many centers. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has evolved significantly during the past 10 years in our experience as well as that of others. It cannot be considered as a standard yet, but it is being performed in rapidly increasing numbers with good surgical efficiency and oncologic efficacy parallel to that of open surgery.

Hemostasis, Surgical↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in the management of clinical stage I and II testicular cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) has been advocated for and utilized in the management of testicular cancer. In this overview, we present our technique and results in comparison with the worldwide experience with laparoscopic RPLND in the management of clinical stage I and II cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over the last 13 years, 162 patients with testicular cancer clinical stage I (N = 103) or II (N = 43 IIB, 16 IIC) underwent laparoscopic RPLND. All intraoperative and postoperative data were evaluated, as well as the worldwide experience with the procedure. With a mean follow-up of 62 months (range 6-113 months) for clinical stage I and 53 months (range 10-89 months) for clinical stage II, oncologic efficiency was evaluated. RESULTS: The procedure was feasible even after chemotherapy, with only three conversions to open RPLND in clinical stage I. The mean operative time was 217, 216, and 281 minutes for clinical stages I, IIB, and IIC, respectively. The mean blood loss was 144 mL and 165 mL for clinical stage I and II, respectively. The hospital stays were 3.6 and 3.8 days, respectively. During follow-up, we had two retroperitoneal relapses (1.2%) and four distant relapses (2.5%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic RPLND has demonstrated its surgical and oncologic efficacy. The morbidity and the complication rate are low. Recurrence rates are comparable to those of open surgery. Laparoscopic RPLND is safe, with less postoperative morbidity, quicker convalescence, better cosmetic results, and a diagnostic accuracy equal that of the open technique.

Adolescent↗