[Early and intermediate gastric cancer. Clinical characteristics and survival (author's transl)].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to N Velasco.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of glutamine-supplemented polymeric enteral formulas on the recovery of gut-permeability abnormalities in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-three patients were randomized to receive a conventional casein-based enteral formula (ADN), ADN plus glutamine in a dose of 0.15 g x kg(-1) x d(-1) or ADN plus 0.30 g x kg(-1) x d(-1) of glutamine for 8 d. The lactulose mannitol permeability test (L/M) was performed at baseline and at the end of the study. Nineteen healthy volunteers served as controls for the L/M test. RESULTS: An increase in permeability compared with control subjects was observed in patients at baseline (mean +/- standard error of the mean; L/M ratio: 0.11 +/- 0.03 and 0.025 +/- 0.004, respectively; P < 0.02). The L/M ratio improved after the period of enteral nutrition as a whole (initial L/M: 0.11 +/- 0.03, final L/M: 0.061 +/- 0.01; P < 0.03), but no difference was found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Even though polymeric enteral nutrition was associated with a significant improvement in the L/M ratio, glutamine supplementation did not show a specific influence in improving recovery of gut permeability in critically ill patients.
BACKGROUND: No consensus exists about the management of iatrogenically induced excessive hypocoagulability episodes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the two most common therapeutic approaches in such situations (discontinuation of the oral anticoagulant vs. low-dose subcutaneous vitamin K1) when acenocoumarol is the normally used anticoagulant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was retrospective and comparative. Patients received antithrombotic therapy using acenocoumarol. Anticoagulant plasmatic activity was assessed through the international normalized ratio (INR) recorded from December 1994 to December 1997 at two medical centers. RESULTS: INR is brought faster to a safe range in patients treated with low-dose vitamin K1 (p = 0.01). Their long-term behavior is also more stable and predictable and no resistance to the oral anticoagulant was found. CONCLUSION: Low-dose vitamin K1 is a safer therapeutic option compared to simply withholding the oral anticoagulant. Its best scheme of administration, however, has yet to be defined.
Since the measurement of total nitrogen output (TNO) is not routinely determined in the clinical setting, its level is frequently estimated using formulas based on the urinary urea nitrogen excretion (UUN). We measured TNO in 124 surgical patients over 990 days (TNO, 19.22 +/- 8.72 g N/day; total urinary nitrogen (TUN) 18.17 +/- 8.70 g N/day; UUN, 15.17 +/- 7.70 g N/day; mean gastrointestinal nitrogen (MGIN) 0.68 +/- 0.49 g N/day; integumental nitrogen (ITGN), 0.34 +/- 0.08 g N/day) and compared the results with the daily estimations using three different formulas: formula A, UUN + 4; formula B, UUN x 1.20 + 1.05, where 1.20 is the reciprocal of the mean ratio UUN/TUN and 1.05 the mean extraurinary nitrogen losses; and formula C, UUN x 1.0986 + 2.55, derived from the regression analysis of UUN vs TNO. TNO estimated by these formulas were 19.17 +/- 7.70, 19.26 +/- 9.24, and 19.22 +/- 8.70 g N/day, respectively. The regression analyses of the estimated TNO from the three formulas versus the measured TNO indicated that formulas A, B and C were equally accurate in estimating TNO over the entire range of UUN. However, when only values of UUN greater than or equal to 30 g N were considered, a modified formula A (UUN + 6) was the best predictor of TNO. Daily audits of the differences between the estimated and measured TNO showed comparable results for the three formulas. In 28.4 to 31.1% of the observed days the differences were higher than +/- 2 g N/day, an error which is not acceptable when estimating the protein requirements in many clinical conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
We compared the efficacy of two enteral solutions that were isonitrogenous and of identical amino acid composition but differed in that one solution contained only free amino acids whereas the other contained a mixture of free amino acids and peptides. Protein kinetics and nitrogen balance were evaluated in a group of six elective surgical patients. Primed-constant infusion with 15N-glycine was started 24h after gynecologic surgery and sustained over 3 days. During the first postoperative day, patients received enteral 0.45% saline. During postoperative days two and three, the patients received either the free amino acid solution or the mixture of peptides and free amino acids in a crossover design. There were no differences in protein kinetics or nitrogen balance with the two treatments.