Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Roewer

Publications and source records attributed to N Roewer.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

[Thio- and oxybarbiturates inhibit peristalsis in the Guinea-pig ileum in vitro].

INTRODUCTION: Inhibition of gastrointestinal motility by drugs used for anaesthesia or sedation in critically ill patients in the ICU is a major problem leading to various complications. Thus this study examines whether the thio- and oxybarbiturates thiopentone and pentobarbitone exert an inhibitory effect on intestinal peristalsis. METHODS: Peristalsis in isolated segments of the guinea-pig small intestine was elicited by distension of the gut wall through a rise of intraluminal pressure and recorded via the intraluminal pressure changes associated with the aborally moving peristaltic contractions. Thiopentone and pentobarbitone (0.1 - 300 microM)-induced inhibition of peristalsis was reflected by an increase of the peristaltic pressure threshold (PPT). RESULTS: Thiopentone (EC50 = 19,8 microM) and pentobarbitone (EC50 = 99.7 micro M) concentration-dependently increased the PPT. While the vehicle (saline) and 0.1 - 10 micro M thiopentone and pentobarbitone were without any effect on the PPT, 100 micro M caused a significant increase in PPT, and complete abolition of peristalsis occurred after 300 micro M thiopentone or pentobarbitone in all segments tested. Inhibition was reversed by changing the bath solution. CONCLUSIONS: Thio- and oxybarbiturates inhibit intestinal peristalsis in the guinea-pig ileum. It is assumed that thiopentone and pentobarbitone affect propulsive peristalsis also in the human small intestine.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND: In order to identify patients who would benefit from prophylactic amtiemetics, six predictive models have been described for the risk assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study compared the validity and practicability of these models in patients undergoing general anaesthesia. METHODS: Data were analysed from 1566 patients who underwent balanced anaesthesia without prophylactic antiemetic treatment for various types of surgery. A systematic literature search identified six predictive models for PONV. These models were compared with respect to validity (discriminating power and calibration characteristics) and practicability. Discriminating power was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration was assessed by weighted linear regression analysis between predicted and actual incidences of PONV. Practicability was assessed according to the number of factors to be considered for the model (the fewer factors the better), and whether the score could be used in combination with a previously applied cost-effective concept. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV was 600/1566 (38.1%). The discriminating power (AUC) obtained by the models (named according to the first author) using the risk classes from the recommended prophylactic concept were as follows: Apfel, 0.68; Koivuranta, 0.66; Sinclair, 0.66; Palazzo, 0.63; Gan, 0.61; Scholz, 0.61. For four models, the following calibration curves (expressed as the slope and the offset) were plotted: Apfel, y=0.82x+0.01, r2=0.995; Koivuranta, y=1.13x-0.10, r2=0.999; Sinclair, y=0.49x+0.29, r2=0.789; Palazzo, y=0.30x+0.30, r2=0.763. The numbers of parameters to be considered were as follows: Apfel, 4; Koivuranta, 5; Palazzo, 5; Scholz, 9; Sinclair, 12; Gan, 14. CONCLUSION: The simplified risk scores provided better discrimination and calibration properties compared with the more complex risk scores. Therefore, simplified risk scores can be recommended for antiemetic strategies in clinical practice as well as for group comparisons in randomized controlled antiemetic trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause of early but not delayed postoperative vomiting: a randomized controlled trial of factorial design.

BACKGROUND: Despite intensive research, the main causes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain unclear. We sought to quantify the relative importance of operative, anaesthetic and patient-specific risk factors to the development of PONV. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 1180 children and adults at high risk for PONV scheduled for elective surgery. Using a five-way factorial design, we randomly assigned subjects by gender who were undergoing specific operative procedures, to receive various combinations of anaesthetics, opioids, and prophylactic antiemetics. RESULTS: Of the 1180 patients, 355 (30.1% 95% CI (27.5-32.7%)) had at least one episode of postoperative vomiting (PV) within 24 h post-anaesthesia. In the early postoperative period (0-2 h), the leading risk factor for vomiting was the use of volatile anaesthetics, with similar odds ratios (OR (95% CI)) being found for isoflurane (19.8 (7.7-51.2)), enflurane (16.1 (6.2-41.8)) and sevoflurane (14.5 (5.6-37.4)). A dose-response relationship was present for the use of volatile anaesthetics. In contrast, no dose response existed for propofol anaesthesia. In the delayed postoperative period (2-24 h), the main predictors were being a child (5.7 (3.0-10.9)), PONV in the early period (3.4 (2.4-4.7)) and the use of postoperative opioids (2.5 (1.7-3.7)). The influence of the antiemetics was considerably smaller and did not interact with anaesthetic or surgical variables. CONCLUSION: Volatile anaesthetics were the leading cause of early postoperative vomiting. The pro-emetic effect was larger than other risk factors. In patients at high risk for PONV, it would therefore make better sense to avoid inhalational anaesthesia rather than simply to add an antiemetic, which may still be needed to prevent or treat delayed vomiting.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

The influence of a dominating centre on a quantitative systematic review of granisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND: We performed a meta-analysis on granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and further investigated whether total results and the dose-response characteristics may be significantly affected by a single centre. METHODS: Systematically searched randomised controlled trials (RCT) using granisetron for the prevention of PONV after general anaesthesia were included in the analysis. The pooled relative risks (RR) and numbers needed to treat (NNT) with their corresponding 95%-confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. For all centres, one dominating centre and other centres pooled, comparisons were performed according to all doses, low dose ( 20 microg/kg) granisetron. RESULTS: A total of 27 RCT with 2938 patients were included in the analysis. RR (CI) to suffer from PONV with granisetron when all comparisons were considered was 0.46 (0.39-0.54), 0.7 (0.6-0.81) and 0.34 (0.28-0.41) for all doses, low and high dose, respectively. RR of the dominating centre (1867 patients) were significantly better compared to the remaining centres (1071 patients), with 0.41 (0.34-0.49) and 0.60 (0.49-0.73), respectively. In the dominating centre low dose granisetron was ineffective with a RR of 0.84 (0.68-1.04), while high dose granisetron led to a strong decrease with a RR of 0.30 (0.26-0.36). In contrast, the RR of other centres pooled for low and high dose granisetron were comparable with 0.62 (0.49-0.79) and 0.56 (0.42-0.75), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results and dose-response characteristics of meta-analyses may be significantly altered by one dominating centre. Further, if data of a dominating centre do not appear to be valid for other centres, it may seem advisable to either exclude them from the analysis or to perform sub-group analyses so that results without the data from the dominating centre are available.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2001

What can be expected from risk scores for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting?

Several risk scores have been developed to calculate the probability of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, the power to discriminate which individual will suffer from PONV is still limited. Thus, we wondered how the number of predictors in a score affects the discriminating power and how the characteristics of a population--which is needed to measure the power of a score--may affect the results. For ethical reasons and to be independent from centre specific populations, we developed a computer model to simulate virtual populations. Four populations were created according to number, frequency, and odds ratio of predictors. Population I: parameters were derived from a previously published paper to verify whether calculated and reported values are in accordance. Population II: a gynaecological population was created to investigate the impact of the study setting. Populations III and IV: to meet ideal assumptions a model with up to seven predictors with an odds ratio of 2 and 3 was tested, respectively. The discriminating power of a risk score was measured by the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and an increase of more than 0.025 per predictor was considered to be clinically relevant. The AUC of population I was similar to those reported in clinical investigations (0.72). The study setting had a considerable impact on the discriminating power since the AUC decreased to 0.65 in a gynaecological setting. The AUC with the 'idealized' populations III and IV was at best in the range of 0.7-0.8. The inclusion of more than five predictors did not lead to a clinically relevant improvement. The currently available simplified risk scores (with four or five predictors) are useful both as a method to estimate individual risk of PONV and as a method for comparing groups of patients for antiemetic trials. They are also superior to single predictor models which are just using the patients' history of PONV or female gender alone. However, our analysis suggests that the power to discriminate which indvidual will suffer from PONV will remain imperfect, even when more predictors are considered.

Area Under Curve↗
PubMed2001

The detection of interatrial flow patency in awake and anesthetized patients: a comparative study using transnasal transesophageal echocardiography.

UNLABELLED: The Valsalva maneuver in the awake patient and the ventilation maneuver in the tracheally intubated anesthetized patient are two provocation methods to detect a patent foramen ovale (PFO) by means of contrast transesophageal echocardiography. In 60 patients undergoing posterior fossa surgery, a contrast agent was administered via a peripheral vein during a Valsalva maneuver immediately before anesthesia induction, followed by central venous administration during a ventilation maneuver in the same patients when anesthetized and endotracheally intubated. We evaluated both maneuvers with a 32-element monoplane transnasal transesophageal echocardiography probe to trace the atrial flow of the contrast agent in a 90 degrees bicaval view. A maneuver was rated positive when more than four bubbles appeared in the left atrium during the first three cardiac cycles after intrathoracic pressure release. The right atrial cross-sectional area before pressure release, and the peak septal excursion during atrial contrast opacification, were measured. McNemar's test was used to assess a paired dichotomous response on the two maneuvers for a significant difference. In 56 patients, the ventilation maneuver was significantly (P < 0.037) more often positive for PFO (n = 14) than the Valsalva maneuver (n = 7). Although there was no difference in the methods regarding the peak septal excursion, the mean right atrial area before pressure release was significantly smaller during the ventilation maneuver than during the Valsalva maneuver (11.2 +/- 3.1 cm(2) vs 14.4 +/- 3.3 cm(2), n = 42, P < 0.05). In the patients with a positive ventilation, but a negative Valsalva maneuver, the discrepancy was even larger (10.9 +/- 4.4 cm(2) vs 16.3 +/- 4.2 cm(2), n = 7, P < 0.001). We conclude that the ventilation maneuver is superior to the Valsalva maneuver in detecting PFO. Our data suggest that a peak pressure of 30 cm H(2)O during the ventilation maneuver achieves a more pronounced reduction in right atrial load and allows right atrial pressure to exceed left atrial pressure when intrathoracic pressure is released. IMPLICATIONS: A controlled ventilation maneuver in anesthetized patients immediately before posterior fossa surgery may be superior to the preoperative Valsalva maneuver in detecting a patent foramen ovale by contrast transesophageal echocardiography. This approach identifies patients at high risk for paradoxic embolism, but it is not practical for preoperative identification of patients who might benefit from patent foramen ovale closure before surgery.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2001

An increased body mass index is no risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting. A systematic review and results of original data.

BACKGROUND: An increased Body Mass Index (BMI) is almost always mentioned as a fundamental risk factor for postoperative nausea (PN), vomiting (PV) or both (PONV). However, multivariate analyses were unable to detect any correlation. Therefore, we asked whether an increased BMI is really a risk factor for PONV. METHODS: For the systematic review, a search of electronic databases and a detailed manual search of reviews were carried out. For the analysis of the original data, 587 adult patients from a randomised controlled antiemetic trial (RCT) who underwent general anaesthesia were allocated to four weight groups: Underweight (BMI < 20), Normal Weight (BMI 20-25), Overweight (BMI 25-30) and Obesity (BMI > or = 30). RESULTS: Four publications with original data were found. Two described a positive relationship, although not clearly supported by the data. Despite this, most narrative reviews claimed a positive correlation between obesity and PONV by quoting again narrative reviews or misquoting originals. In the RCT, the calculated underlying risk profile for PONV was comparable between all groups. Incidences (95% confidence intervals) of PONV were 45.8% (34.0; 57.6), 41.7 (36.5; 46.9), 47.8 (38.4; 57.1) and 44.1 (31.0; 57.1), for the groups Underweight, Normal Weight, Overweight and Obesity, respectively (P=0.69). The incidences of PN and PV also did not differ with P=0.76 and P=0.36, respectively. CONCLUSION: Systematic search of the literature provides no evidence for a positive relationship. Furthermore, our data confirm that an increased BMI is not a risk factor for PONV. This negative finding is important as focussing on the relevant risk factors is needed to allow for an objective risk assessment of PONV.

Body Mass Index↗
PubMed2000

[Risk factors for nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia: fictions and facts].

Numerous factors have been claimed to influence postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A critical review of the literature reveals, that strong evidence based on original double-blind, randomized, controlled trials or their meta-analyses is only available for very few risk factors. For most other factors, although mentioned in narrative reviews, there is insufficient evidence. Sufficient evidence on original data or meta-analyses is present for female gender, a history of PONV or motion sickness, non-smoking-status, young age, volatile anaesthetics, nitrous oxide and postoperative opioids. Factors with conflicting results are the menstrual cycle, hypnotics for induction, mask ventilation and nasogastric tube, the experience of the anaesthetist, muscle relaxants and their antagonists and laparoscopic procedures. Insufficient evidence is present for the other types of operation, psychological factors including anxiety and pain. No evidence due to lack of data applies to postoperative movement, hemodynamic stability, hypercarbia and acid-base-shifts. For adipositas++ there is not only a lack of evidence for an effect but evidence for a lack of effect based on several multivariate analyses. In conclusion, we have developed the following simplified view: PONV is mainly caused by opioids and volatile anaesthetics when applied to susceptible patients (females, non-smoker, positive history of previous sickness).

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2000

The impact of 4-chloro-m-cresol in heparin formulas on malignant hyperthermia: in vitro and in vivo.

BACKGROUND: The preservative 4-chloro-m-cresol (4CmC) is a specific activator of sarcoplasmic Ca2- release and induces contractures in skeletal muscles of malignant hyperthermia susceptible (MHS) patients in vitro. Clinical formulas of heparin contain 4CmC. We studied whether (a) these heparin formulas induce contractures in isolated MHS and normal (MHN) human skeletal muscles and whether (b) significant serum levels of 4CmC are reached after heparinization in cardiopulmonary bypass patients. METHODS: (a) In vitro, muscle bundles of 16 MHS and 22 MHN patients were exposed to the heparin formula Liquemin (containing 4CmC 0.08 mg/500 IU), to chlorocresol and to preservative-free heparin in the in vitro contracture test. (b) In vivo, serum 4CmC levels of 12 patients receiving Liquemin 500 IU/ kg before cardiopulmonary bypass were determined at 1, 5 and 60 min by high-pressure liquid chromatography. RESULTS: (a) For Liquemin and 4CmC, significant contractures were measured with MHS muscles compared to MHN muscles at 61.4 microM 4CmC. (b) In control sera, the detection threshold for 4CmC was 4 microM. Concentrations of 4CmC in all patients' serum samples were below this threshold. CONCLUSION: Heparin formulas, containing 4CmC, induce dose-dependent contractures in vitro in MHS human skeletal muscle at about 60 microM 4CmC. However, in vivo, 4CmC serum concentrations with therapeutic heparinization are less than 1/15 of the in vitro concentration. The lipophilicity of 4CmC with a high volume of distribution may account for these findings. MHS patients seem not to be at risk from clinical heparin formulas containing chlorocresol.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Intracavitary contrast intensity after transpulmonary transmission of a second-generation contrast agent at normal and reduced myocardial contractility.

In this closed-chest preparation in 10 anesthetized pigs, we determined the effects of left ventricular (LV) contractility changes on the echocardiographic contrast intensity variation of a second-generation contrast agent within the LV cavity. The peak positive rate of change in LV pressure (dP/dt(max)), as an index of the isovolumetric phase, was gradually reduced by administration of halothane and propranolol, and the velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (Vcfs) was referenced as an index for the LV ejection phase. Contrast intensity-time curves of the LV cavity were obtained after transpulmonary transmission of the contrast agent. An off-line densitometric method was performed to determine peak maximum and minimum intensities (I(max), I(min)) and their difference (I(amp)). Compared with baseline values, at reductions in dP/dt(max) of 50% and 75%, the contrast intensity parameters I(max), I(min), and I(amp) were decreased by 23% +/- 6% and 44% +/- 5%, 24% +/- 5% and 44% +/- 3%, and 31% +/- 6% and 45% +/- 3%, respectively (P <.05). Significant correlations were observed between I(amp) and dp/dt(max) (r = 0.82, P <.003, n = 30) and their changes (r = 0.59, P <.03, n = 20), but correlations between contrast indexes and Vcfs were only moderate. The sensitivity of I(amp) to indicate changes in dP/dt(max) and Vcfs was 0.95 and 0.83, respectively. The cyclic variation of LV intracavitary contrast intensity reflects the isovolumetric contraction phase better than the ejection phase. The results suggest that measurements of cyclic intensity changes may contribute to the assessment of myocardial contractility changes. Underlying biophysical mechanisms and load dependency of this phenomenon require further investigation.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Preliminary report: analgesia with Remifentanil for complicated eye muscle surgery.

The authors report a new anesthetic technique that is especially suitable for the surgery of complicated disorders of ocular motility. Analgesia is achieved by an intravenous dose of Remifentanil, an opioid that is normally used together with propophol as a form of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for general anesthesia. The advantage of Remifentanil is a rapid increase (1-2 min.) and decrease (3-4 min.) of the effect. Eye muscle surgery can then be performed on a patient who is free of pain and slightly sedated. After the planned eye muscle surgery, while the patient is still under anesthesia, the muscle sutures are tied provisionally. Afterwards, the squint angle can be measured with a cover test and the patient is questioned about the presence of diplopia. If the position of the eye is not satisfactory, the knots can be loosened and the muscle can be fixated in another position.

Analgesia↗
PubMed2000

Propofol decreases stimulated dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens by a mechanism independent of dopamine D2, GABAA and NMDA receptors.

Although propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) is a popular i.v. general anaesthetic, it has been suggested to have abuse potential. As many drugs of abuse act preferentially via release of dopamine in the limbic system, we investigated the action of propofol on stimulated dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens. Nucleus accumbens slices were superfused (1.6 ml min-1) with artificial cerebrospinal fluid at 32 degrees C. Dopamine release was evoked by electrical stimulation (10 pulses, 0.1 ms, 10 mA, 10 Hz, every 10 min) and monitored by fast cyclic voltammetry. Propofol 100 mumol litre-1 reduced stimulated dopamine release over the 2 h after administration, relative to intralipid controls, to mean 30 (SEM 2)% (P < 0.01). The dopamine D2 receptor antagonist metoclopramide 0.3 mumol litre-1 increased dopamine release but did not block the effect of propofol (38 (3)%). The selective GABAA antagonist bicuculline 24 mumol litre-1 also failed to antagonize the action of propofol (45 (3)%). The NMDA receptor antagonist dextromethorphan 10 mumol litre-1 decreased dopamine release to 57 (6)% (P < 0.01) but failed to block the inhibitory effect of propofol (46 (6)%). Although propofol has been reported to bind to D2, GABAA and NMDA receptors, failure of metoclopramide and bicuculline to block its effects suggests that an agonist action at D2 or GABAA receptors does not mediate the effects of propofol on dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens. The lack of effect of dextromethorphan makes an NMDA receptor antagonist action unlikely.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗