Biomedical subjects
N Rajan
Publications and source records attributed to N Rajan.
Anaesthesia in myotonia dystrophica.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Craniovertebral anomaly with visual field defect.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Clinical outcomes with insulin lispro compared with human regular insulin: a meta-analysis.
We performed a meta-analysis to compare insulin lispro and human regular insulin across a range of outcomes common in modern diabetes management to establish a basis for subsequent economic evaluation. We included all identifiable head-to-head randomized controlled trials, pooling dichotomous and continuous outcomes using appropriate statistical methods. Measures associated with various aspects of glycemic control (preparandial and postprandial glycemic control, glucose excursion, and glycated hemoglobin) and with hypoglycemia were evaluated. Results showed significant differences in favor of insulin lispro in the outcomes associated with postprandial glycemic control without an increase in hypoglycemia. Outcomes associated with fasting glycemic control and overall long-term glycemic control were not significantly different between insulin lispro and human regular insulin. Alternative approaches to the meta-analysis were explored but did not alter the conclusions. Thus our meta-analysis supports the existence of significant differences between insulin lispro and human regular insulin in terms of important postprandial outcome measures in diabetes. In addition, there is a practical difference in injection timing relative to meals: human regular insulin should be administered 30 to 45 minutes before eating, whereas insulin lispro can be administered 15 minutes or less before eating. These differences should be the subject of an economic evaluation to assist in determining the place of insulin lispro in diabetes management.
Cost-effectiveness of pergolide compared to bromocriptine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a decision-analytic model.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of pergolide versus bromocriptine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: A Markov decision-analytic model is used to examine cost-effectiveness. The model ran for 20 cycles of 6 months' duration, and the patients progress through six stages: Hoehn-Yahr stages 1-5 and death. The transitional probabilities for each stage are derived from a 12-year longitudinal study of patients with PD. The costs in the model are derived from an expert panel containing six Australian neurologists. A review of the randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus bromocriptine was undertaken. Five studies were identified, with four showing that pergolide offers superior efficacy when compared to bromocriptine. The Mizuno et al. (1995) study was the largest of the controlled trials and also measured patient Hoehn-Yahr status before and after treatment. This was identified as the most appropriate source of relative efficacy data for the model. The model examined various scenarios based on alternate durations of superior clinical benefit with pergolide compared to bromocriptine. The main analysis assumed that patients in each arm of the model would have identical Hoehn-Yahr status by the fifth year. Sensitivity analysis was used to determine cost-effectiveness in the case where the therapeutic benefit was of a shorter duration. RESULTS: The Mizuno study indicates that an additional 19.09% of patients improved by at least one stage on pergolide over bromocriptine, with an odds ratio of 2.26 (p < .01). The total health care cost per patient over the 10-year period was $46,323 in the pergolide treatment arm and $47,351 in the bromocriptine treatment arm, an incremental saving of $1028. Patients also spent extra time in Hoehn-Yahr stages 1, 2, and 3. In sensitivity analyses, when the benefit from pergolide expired between 6 months and 5 years after treatment cessation, cost savings ranged from $68 to $2535. CONCLUSION: Pergolide is cost saving and more efficacious than bromocriptine, and is therefore cost-effective.