Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N R Raper

Publications and source records attributed to N R Raper.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Omega-3 fatty acid content of the US food supply.

In this study, levels and sources of omega-3 fatty acids (FA) available for consumption in the US food supply, dating from 1935, are estimated. omega-3 FA assessed are eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and linolenic acid (LNA). Estimates are based on annual per capita food use data and data on the omega-3 FA content of foods. Although fish use increased, the EPA level was slightly lower in 1985 than in 1935-1939, reflecting a marked decline in use of certain fatty fish. The level of DHA increased, due to greater use of poultry. The level of LNA increased because of greater use of soybean oil. These estimates are currently the only source of data on omega-3 FA in the American diet.

Animals↗

Levels and sources of fat in the U.S. food supply.

The amount of fat in the U.S. food supply increased one-third between 1909-13 and 1984, from 124 grams to 166 grams per capita per day. Also, the proportion of food energy provided by fat increased from 32 to 43 percent. The gain in fat in the food supply was due to an increase in fat from vegetable sources. The share of fat from vegetable sources increased from 17 to 42 percent between 1909-13 and 1984. Although animal fats provided the largest share of fat, their proportionate contribution declined from 83 to 58 percent between 1909-13 and 1984. Three food groups--fats and oils; meat, poultry, and fish; and dairy products--provided about 90 percent of the fat in the food supply throughout the past 75 years. However, the shares of fat provided by these groups changed. The share from the fats and oils group increased from 37 to 44 percent between 1909-13 and 1984, while the share from the meat, poultry, and fish group declined from 37 to 34 percent, and the share from the dairy products group declined from 15 to 12 percent. Fat from the fats and oils group increased 59 percent between 1909-13 and 1984. Most of the gain in fat from this group was due to increased use of edible oils. Margarine replaced much of the butter and shortening replaced much of the lard as sources of fat. Fat from the meat, poultry, and fish group increased 24 percent between 1909-13 and 1984. Pork accounted for the largest proportion of fat from this group and beef ranked second. The share of fat from poultry, although much smaller than either pork or beef, almost tripled. Fat from dairy products was about the same in 1984 as in 1909-13. Cheese was the leading source of fat from dairy products by 1984. Until recent years, whole milk was the leading source, although its share declined substantially after the late 1950's. Despite their low fat content, the share of fat from skim and lowfat milks increased as use increased, particularly in the past 25 years. The proportion of fat provided by frozen desserts increased over the years, while that from creams decreased. Among the fatty acids in the food supply, the quantity of TSFA increased by 10 percent between 1909-13 and 1984. Quantities of oleic and linoleic acid increased by 39 and 189 percent, respectively, between 1909-13 and 1984.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

Estimates of available iron in diets of individuals 1 year old and older in the Nationwide Food Consumption Survey.

Levels of total iron and available iron were estimated in the diets of individuals 1 year and older. The source of data was 1-day dietary recall records from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's 1977-78 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey. Total iron intakes of 1- to 2- and 3- to 5-year-old children were 51% and 77% of their respective RDAs. Total iron intakes of 12- to 50-year-old girls and women averaged only 55% to 61% of their RDA. Total iron intakes of other groups came close to or exceeded their respective RDAs. The proportion of total iron calculated to be available ranged from 6.5% to 8.7%, which is less than the 10% assumption of availability used as a basis for setting the iron RDA. When compared with the RDAs, total iron presented a more favorable picture of dietary iron intake than available iron. In relation to the RDAs, proportions of available iron were consistently lower than proportions of total iron. Available iron was lower than total iron in relation to recommended allowances because less than 10% of total dietary iron was available.

Adolescent↗