Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N R Cutler

Publications and source records attributed to N R Cutler.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Cholinesterase inhibitors: a therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) tested as therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease (AD). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches (January 1986-July 1998) identified pertinent literature. Selected references from these articles, as well as abstracts from recent meetings and package insert literature from approved compounds, were also used as source material. DATA EXTRACTION: AChEIs were reviewed with regard to chemical structure, mechanism of inhibition, substrate specificity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety/tolerability, and efficacy. DATA SYNTHESIS: Cholinergic deficits, leading to cognitive impairment, are a significant aspect of neurodegeneration in AD. AChEIs reduce the degradation of acetylcholine, thus enhancing cholinergic transmission. In addition to the two agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration, tacrine and donepezil, six other compounds of diverse chemical structure and mechanism of inhibition including physostigmine, metrifonate, rivastigmine, and galantamine are under investigation as potential therapy for AD. These compounds are structurally diverse, possess unique patterns of specificities for the various forms of cholinesterase enzymes, use distinct mechanisms of enzyme inhibition, present unique adverse event profiles, and offer relatively similar mean gains in cognitive abilities to patients with AD in controlled clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to placebo, new AChEIs in development provide modest improvements in cognition for patients with mild to moderate AD, with improved tolerability profiles and more convenient dosing relative to tacrine. The availability of a wide array of AChEIs soon to be accessible to patients with AD will provide additional options to those who cannot tolerate or do not respond to drugs currently used for AD.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed1999

Recent developments in the drug treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder with an impact on public health which continues to increase with the increasing longevity of the population. The disease is characterised clinically by a progressive loss of cognitive and behavioural function. These deficits are thought to result from decreased cholinergic transmission; therefore, restoring cholinergic function has been the main focus in the development of drugs for AD. Several pharmacological approaches to enhancing cholinergic function have been developed for symptomatic or palliative therapy of AD. Although these strategies have resulted in modest cognitive and behavioural improvements in patients with AD, they do not address the underlying progression of the disease. New strategies will be required to slow, stop or reverse the effects of neurodegeneration in AD. A number of potential therapies are currently under investigation, including estrogen replacement, anti-inflammatory agents, free radical scavengers and antioxidants, and monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors. The evidence for a protective effect of estrogens or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is controversial, and largely based on retrospective studies. More controlled prospective studies are needed to definitively demonstrate the benefits of long term estrogen or NSAID use in the prevention of AD. Free radical scavengers/antioxidants such as idebenone, and selective prevention MAO-B inhibitors such as lazabemide are well tolerated, but require additional studies in order to demonstrate preventative effects. In addition, other approaches, such as anti-amyloid treatments that affect beta-amylase secretion, aggregation and toxicity, appear promising; treatments that hinder neurofibrillary tangle construction and nerve growth factor (NGF) induction are in the very early stages of development.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed1999

Meta-analysis of the safety and tolerability of two dose regimens of buspirone in patients with persistent anxiety.

Buspirone is an azapirone with 5-HT1A partial agonist activity which has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, commonly referred to as persistent anxiety. In this meta-analysis report, safety results from two studies comparing buspirone 15 mg twice daily (BID) with buspirone 10 mg three times daily (TID) in patients with persistent anxiety are presented. In the study protocols, qualified patients completed a 7-day placebo lead-in phase and were randomized to receive buspirone 30 mg per day, as either a BID or TID regimen, for 6-8 weeks. A total of 289 patients received buspirone 15 mg BID (n = 144) or 10 mg TID (n = 145) at 15 sites. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two treatment groups, except for a significantly greater incidence of palpitations in patients receiving buspirone BID (5%) compared to buspirone TID (1%). The most frequently reported adverse events for both buspirone BID- and TID-treated patients were dizziness, headache, and nausea. No appreciable differences between treatments were observed for vital signs, physical exam, ECG, or clinical laboratory results. A change to BID dosing for buspirone may offer convenience and possibly higher compliance in patients with persistent anxiety without compromising the excellent safety and tolerability profile of the medication.

Anti-Anxiety Agents↗
PubMed1998

Sertraline in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the treatment of choice for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder; however, empirical support for this assertion has been weaker for children and adolescents than for adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline hydrochloride in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients: 107 children aged 6 to 12 years and 80 adolescents aged 13 to 17 years randomized to receive either sertraline (53 children, 39 adolescents) or placebo (54 children, 41 adolescents). SETTING: Twelve US academic and community clinics with experience conducting randomized controlled trials. INTERVENTION: Sertraline hydrochloride was titrated to a maximum of 200 mg/d during the first 4 weeks of double-blind therapy, after which patients continued to receive this dosage of medication for 8 more weeks. Control patients received placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), the National Institute of Mental Health Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale (NIMH GOCS), and the NIMH Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) rating scales. RESULTS: In intent-to-treat analyses, patients treated with sertraline showed significantly greater improvement than did placebo-treated patients on the CY-BOCS (adjusted mean, -6.8vs -3.4, respectively; P=.005), the NIMH GOCS (-2.2 vs -1.3, respectively; P=.02), and the CGI-I (2.7 vs 3.3, respectively; P=.002) scales. Significant differences in efficacy between sertraline and placebo emerged at week 3 and persisted for the duration of the study. Based on CGI-I ratings at end point, 42% of patients receiving sertraline and 26% of patients receiving placebo were very much or much improved. Neither age nor sex predicted response to treatment. The incidence of insomnia, nausea, agitation, and tremor were significantly greater in patients receiving sertraline; 12 (13%) of 92 sertraline-treated patients and 3 (3.2%) of 95 placebo-treated patients discontinued prematurely because of adverse medical events (P=.02). No clinically meaningful abnormalities were apparent on vital sign determinations, laboratory findings, or electrocardiographic measurements. CONCLUSION: Sertraline appears to be a safe and effective short-term treatment for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

A bridging study of LU 25-109 in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.

Lu 25-109 is a functionally selective partial M1 agonist with M2/M3 antagonist properties. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-part, inpatient bridging study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple oral doses of Lu 25-109 in patients with Alzheimer's Disease(AD), and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in this population. In the first part of the study, the fixed-dose MTD was to be determined in five consecutive panels of 6 patients each (4 Lu 25-109/2 placebo). Doses for the five panels were 100, 125, 150, 200, and 225 mg tid for 7 days. Cholinergic adverse events such as increased salivation, dizziness, and gastrointestinal symptoms were observed at all doses studied. The dosing of fixed-dose panels was discontinued after 3 days at 200 mg tid due to unacceptable gastrointestinal adverse events. Thus, 150 mg tid was defined as the fixed-dose MTD. The second part of the study, conducted in a single panel of 8 patients (6 Lu 25-109/2 placebo), was designed to determine if patients could tolerate higher doses of Lu 25-109 when administered on a titration regimen. Patients were to receive doses that were 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, and 150% of the fixed dose MTD, with dose increases every five days. The first dose, 75 mg tid, was very well-tolerated; however, as in the first phase of the study, patients did not tolerate the 200 mg tid dose. Thus, the titration regimen employed did not improve the overall tolerability of Lu 25-109.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Safety and tolerability of metrifonate in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a maximum tolerated dose study.

Metrifonate, a pro-drug that is transformed non-enzymatically into a potent inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), has been used in the tropics for over 30 years for the treatment of schistosomiasis. A pilot study, and Phase I and Phase II studies of metrifonate in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients conducted prior to the current study showed benign, dose-dependent adverse event profiles consisting primarily of gastrointestinal events, optimal daily dosing with a loading phase (in the absence of a loading dose phase, 6-8 weeks were required to attain steady-state AChE inhibition levels), and an improvement in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) scores. The current open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of relatively high loading doses, followed by lower maintenance doses of metrifonate in the same patient population, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of metrifonate. Accordingly, the first cohort of 8 probable AD patients (per National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association [NINCDS-ADRDA] criteria) were administered once-daily loading doses of 2.5 mg/kg (125-225 mg) for 14 days, followed by 4.0 mg/kg (200-360 mg) for an additional 3 days. These patients were maintained on once-daily doses of 2.0 mg/kg (100-180 mg) for 14 days. AChE inhibition for this cohort ranged from 88% to 94%. On Day 28 of 31, this cohort was discontinued due to moderate to severe side effects in 6 patients; consequently, the second cohort of 8 probable AD patients received a once-daily loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg (125-225 mg) for 14 days followed by a once-daily maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg (75-135 mg) for 35 days. This maintenance dose yielded an AChE inhibition level ranging from 89% to 91%. In spite of an AChE inhibition level comparable to that achieved with the higher dose, the reduced dose was associated with a more favorable adverse event profile which was mainly gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal in nature. The maximum tolerated dose was established at 1.5 mg/kg/day (75-135 mg/day) for maintenance dosing in AD patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Monitoring of acute migraine attacks: placebo response and safety data.

In the course of evaluating the safety and efficacy of an investigational compound for acute migraine headaches, a large number of patients received placebo at a single site, offering the opportunity to characterize subjective and clinical physiologic responses of migraine patients to placebo in a controlled environment. In a single-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 67 patients reported to the clinic while suffering a moderate to severe acute migraine headache and received oral placebo. For 6 hours after treatment, a continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed, and headache severity, adverse events, and vital signs were recorded. Patients returned and repeated the procedure when free from pain. A headache was considered to be improved if its severity dropped to "mild" or "none." Twenty-five patients (37%; 95% CI: 26% to 50%) experienced headache improvement within 2 hours of receiving placebo, and 32 patients (48%: 36% to 60%) improved within 4 hours. There were no clinically important ECG changes during the migraine visit, and there were no clinically relevant differences in vital signs between the migraine and pain-free visits. Thus, a substantial placebo response occurs in migraine headache. Hemodynamic and ECG parameters are unchanged between migraine and pain-free states.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of avitriptan in patients with migraine after oral dosing.

Avitriptan (BMS-180048) is a 5-HT1-like receptor agonist for the treatment of migraine. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and preliminary efficacy of avitriptan in patients with migraine during migrainous and pain-free states. Patients met the IHS criteria for migraine with or without aura and suffered one to six migraines per month for at least 1 year. Patients in a clinic experiencing a migraine headache received avitriptan 75 mg, 150 mg, or 200 mg or matching placebo capsules. Blood samples were obtained before and 0.25, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after dosing. Headache intensity was rated before and up to 6 hours after dosing. Seven to 30 days after the inclinic treatment, patients returned in a pain-free state for the same study medication. All pharmacokinetic and safety measures were repeated. Forty-eight patients (9 men and 39 women) participated. Peak plasma concentrations of avitriptan were achieved 1 to 2 hours following dosing in migraine and pain-free states for all doses. The pharmacokinetics of avitriptan were proportional to dose during a migraine attack over the 75- to 200-mg dose range. The 150- and 200-mg doses of avitriptan demonstrated a greater decrease in headache intensity scores at 2 hours postdose. The most common adverse event was paresthesia. Thus, avitriptan was rapidly absorbed, well tolerated, and demonstrated preliminary efficacy in this population.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Guidelines for conducting bridging studies in Alzheimer disease.

This report provides guidelines for conducting bridging studies in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Bridging studies are late phase I safety/tolerance studies that determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients before phase II efficacy studies are initiated, facilitating the transition from phase I to phase II development. Determining the MTD in patients maximizes the potential to detect efficacy by permitting the use of the highest tolerated doses in phase II while providing a good understanding of potential adverse events. Bridging studies should be double-blind, placebo-controlled, inpatient studies conducted in acute-care facilities by clinical personnel who are equipped to handle unexpected contingencies under the oversight of a competent, multidisciplinary review board. Patients should be in good physical health (excluding AD), and a comprehensive informed consent procedure must be instituted. We recommend initially using a fixed-dose panel design with a dose schedule based on the MTD in normal volunteers and later establishing the dose titration MTD.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy of xanomeline in Alzheimer disease: cognitive improvement measured using the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

The cognitive efficacy of the M1-selective muscarinic agonist xanomeline in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) was measured using the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) in this 17-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Three hundred forty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive 25, 50, or 75 mg xanomeline tartrate or placebo three times daily (t.i.d.) for 24 weeks, followed by placebo for 4 weeks in a single-blind washout phase. Cognitive function was assessed at randomization and after 4, 8, 12, 24, and 28 weeks. Three hundred nineteen patients were included in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 209 completers had evaluable data at week 24. ITT analysis showed a significant (p < or = 0.05) dose-response trend and a significant (p < or = 0.05) between-group comparison favoring 75 mg t.i.d. over placebo for the CNTB summary score but not for the ADAS-cog. In the completer analysis, however, the ADAS-cog showed a significant (p < or = 0.05) dose-response trend and between-group comparison, whereas the CNTB Summary Score did not. The ADAS-cog was less sensitive to treatment effects in mildly impaired patients (ADAS-cog < 21) than in moderately impaired patients (ADAS-cog > or = 21), whereas the CNTB was sensitive in the entire study population (mean ADAS-cog = 22.5+/-9.6). Significant (p < or = 0.05) beneficial treatment effects were seen in measures of simple reaction time and delayed verbal recall, which are included in the CNTB but not in the ADAS-cog. During the single-blind placebo washout period, the ADAS-cog score of the placebo group worsened dramatically (change of 2.63 points; p < or = 0.001), whereas the CNTB score remained stable (change of 1.04 points; p=0.694). Thus, the CNTB appears to be more objective than the ADAS-cog.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Dose-dependent CSF acetylcholinesterase inhibition by SDZ ENA 713 in Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the activity of SDZ ENA 713, a centrally-selective acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and its relationship to central and peripheral pharmacokinetic parameters. METHODS: Eighteen AD patients were enrolled in this open-label, multiple-dose study. Patients were titrated in 1 mg bid/week increments to target doses of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 mg bid SDZ ENA 713. After patients had been maintained at their target dose for at least 3 days, continuous CSF samples were obtained via a lumbar catheter for 12.5 h, beginning 0.5 h prior to the final dose of SDZ ENA 713. RESULTS: Dose-dependent inhibition of CSF AChE was significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with plasma drug and metabolite concentrations. The 6 mg bid treatment group showed a maximum mean inhibition of 62% at 5.6 h post-dose. CONCLUSION: Rapid, sustained, dose-dependent inhibition of CSF AChE suggests that SDZ ENA 713 has therapeutic potential in AD patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

A bridging study of fananserin in schizophrenic patients.

Fananserin is a potential antipsychotic compound with high affinity for both D4 and 5-HT2A receptors, and negligible affinity for D2 receptors. Because the tolerance for antipsychotic compounds often differs between schizophrenic patients and healthy subjects, this bridging study was designed to evaluate the tolerability of fananserin, to define the slow titration maximum tolerated dose in the target population, and to identify the most rapid well-tolerated rate of titration for this compound. Three rates of titration regimens were examined in a total of 26 schizophrenic patients in a parallel group design, following a 3-day placebo washout period from previous antipsychotic medication. The slow rate of titration (reaching the maximum dose of 600 mg/day in 16 days with 100-mg increases every 3 days) was well tolerated, but a rapid titration schedule (reaching 600 mg/day in 8 days with 200-mg increases every 3 days) resulted in hypotension in 3 of 6 patients and termination of the group on Day 10. An intermediate rate of titration (reaching 600 mg/day in 10 days with 100-mg increases every 2 days) was then examined and was well tolerated, with transient episodes of mild hypotension reported in 2 of 10 patients. Thus, although hypotension was identified as the dose-limiting adverse event in this study, a reduction in the titration rate was effective in reducing the incidence and severity of this side effect. In this study, schizophrenic patients administered multiple doses of fananserin tolerated doses 400 percent greater than the maximum tolerated single dose in healthy volunteers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Initial safety, tolerability pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of CI-1007 in patients with schizophrenia.

CI-1007 is a novel dopamine autoreceptor agonist and partial dopamine D2/D3 agonist that is currently under development for the treatment of schizophrenia. This single-blind, rising, multiple-dose, inpatient bridging study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CI-1007 in consecutive panels of patients with schizophrenia. Following a 4-day placebo washout period, 16 patients (4 per panel) were assigned to receive one of four fixed-dosage regimens of CI-1007 (5, 10, 15, or 20 mg q12h for 9 doses). CI-1007 was generally well tolerated over the dose range evaluated. Adverse events, including mild to moderate sporadic orthostatic hypotension and/or nausea and vomiting, were most commonly observed after the initial drug dose and decreased after repeated dosing. Serum concentrations of growth hormone (GH) increased following the administration of CI-1007, confirming its central dopamine agonist activity. Changes in serum prolactin were not related to dose. The pharmacokinetics of CI-1007 and its active metabolite appear linearly related to dose. The results of this study suggest that patients with schizophrenia tolerate slightly higher initial doses of CI-1007 than do healthy subjects.

1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine↗
PubMed1998

Exploratory studies: implications for drug development in Alzheimer's disease.

The process of drug development involves cycles of learning and confirming. In the learning phase of the cycle, data from studies are used to generate hypotheses; later studies are designed specifically to confirm these hypotheses. There is a growing realization that exploratory studies early in drug development are critical for the design of large confimatory clinical trials. For example, patients often differ from healthy volunteers in their tolerance of CNS compounds, so investigators should determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in the patient population though a "bridging study" prior to designing Phase II efficacy trials. By performing well-controlled safety/tolerability studies with a small number of patients on an inpatient basis, researchers can avoid exposing large numbers of study participants to the wrong dose. Bridging studies also provide information on the approximate frequencies of various types of adverse events, which is very helpful in designing outpatient trials to confirm the safety profile. A second type of exploratory study, a "dynabridge study", is an early pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study in patients to measure drug concentrations and activities in the central compartment (assessed by sampling the CSF). Dynabridge studies can be used to optimize the dosing regimen, to confirm that the drug is affecting the targeted receptor, and to measure correlations between drug activity and proposed surrogate markers.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed1997

Combined enalapril and felodipine extended release (ER) for systemic hypertension. Enalapril-Felodipine ER Factorial Study Group.

This multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of factorial design evaluated the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, and the vascular selective calcium antagonist felodipine extended release (ER) in patients with essential hypertension. After a 4-week, single-blind placebo baseline period, 707 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressures (BPs) in the range of 95 to 115 mm Hg received placebo, enalapril (5 or 20 mg), felodipine ER (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), or their combinations for an 8-week double-blind treatment period. All doses of enalapril and felodipine ER had a statistically significant (p < 0.05) additive effect in reducing both systolic and diastolic BP. The trough to peak ratios for the combinations ranged from 0.63 (enalapril 5 mg-felodipine ER 2.5 mg) to 0.79 (enalapril 20 mg-felodipine ER 10 mg) and were consistent with effective BP control with 1 dose/day. Patients aged > or = 65 years demonstrated a greater reduction in diastolic BP. Combinations of enalapril-felodipine ER were associated with less drug-induced peripheral edema (4.1%) compared to felodipine ER monotherapy (10.8%). There were no serious drug-related adverse effects observed during the study. In this trial, the combination of enalapril and felodipine ER effectively lowered BP and was generally well tolerated with an excellent safety profile when used in the treatment of hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Effects of xanomeline, a selective muscarinic receptor agonist, on cognitive function and behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effects of selective cholinergic replacement with xanomeline tartrate, an m1 and m4 selective muscarinic receptor (mAChR) agonist in patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: A 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial followed by a 1-month, single-blind, placebo washout. SETTING: Outpatients at 17 centers in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 343 men and women at least 60 years of age with mild to moderate AD. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 75, 150, or 225 mg (low, medium, and high doses) of xanomeline per day or placebo for 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC+), the Alzheimer's Disease Symptomatology Scale (ADSS), and the Nurses' Observational Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER). RESULTS: A significant treatment effect existed for ADAS-Cog (high dose vs placebo; P < or = .05), and CIBIC+ (high dose vs placebo; P < or = .02). Treatment Emergent Signs and Symptoms analysis of the ADSS, which assesses behavioral symptoms in patients with AD, disclosed significant (P < or = .002) dose-dependent reductions in vocal outbursts, suspiciousness, delusions, agitation, and hallucinations. On end-point analysis, NOSGER, which assesses memory, instrumental activities of daily living, self-care, mood, social behavior, and disturbing behavior in the elderly, also showed a significant dose-response relationship (P < or = .02). In the high-dose arm, 52% of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events; dose-dependent adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal in nature. Syncope, defined as loss of consciousness and muscle tone, occurred in 12.6% of patients in the high-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: The observed improvements in ADAS-Cog and CIBIC+ following treatment with xanomeline provide the first evidence, from a large-scale, placebo-controlled clinical trial, that a direct-acting muscarinic receptor agonist can improve cognitive function in patients with AD. Furthermore, the dramatic and favorable effects on disturbing behaviors in AD suggest a novel approach for treatment of noncognitive symptoms.

Alzheimer Disease↗