Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N O Rothermich

Publications and source records attributed to N O Rothermich.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Gold vs D-penicillamine double blind study and followup.

We undertook a controlled random double-blind comparing gold and penicillamine. Of the 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis entered into the study, 34 completed the protocol. We found no significant differences in the clinical results, laboratory variables, or toxicity. Longterm followup of 55 months revealed that a significant number of patients were no longer on either drug. The notable exceptions were those who were felt to be in remission from either drug, and remained on gold, or penicillamine. No toxicity from penicillamine involving known immunological aberration has thus far been encountered.

Adult↗

Clinical trial of penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis.

The medical records of our first 200 consecutive rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with penicillamine were analyzed retrospectively. All but 5 patients (97.5%) had undergone earlier chrysotherapy that resulted in either therapeutic failure or toxicity. Only 57 patients (28.5%) were still receiving penicillamine on January 1, 1981, and the duration of therapy ranged from 23 to 62 months. The dropout rate due to toxicity, therapeutic failure, relapse, or other reasons was very high (71.5%). Toxic effects required permanent discontinuance in 56 patients (28%). Therapy was discontinued for 36 patients (18%) because of no benefit. A striking number (20) had relapse after therapeutic success and while continuing to take penicillamine, and the therapy had to be discontinued, a relapse rate of 10%. Therapy for the remaining 15.5% was discontinued for miscellaneous reasons that were not related to penicillamine per se: patient anxiety (6%), lost to followup (5%), hospitalization for reasons unrelated to penicillamine therapy (2%), lack of cooperation and study protocol (1% each), or pregnancy (0.5%). By our criteria, 142 patients (71%) received benefit (remission or improvement). Therapy results for these patients were as follows: still on penicillamine on January 1, 1981 (28.5%); no longer receiving the drug due to toxicity (19.5%); no longer receiving penicillamine due to relapse while on continuing therapy (10%); no longer receiving penicillamine due to miscellaneous reasons not related to penicillamine therapy (13%). This study shows that penicillamine is a valuable drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but its value in clinical practice is limited by a rather high incidence of both toxicity and relapse during treatment.

Adult↗

Chrysotherapy. A prospective study.

A 4-year prospective clinical study of chrysotherapy was designed to reexamine old beliefs and traditions, and to test potentially new approaches to chrysotherapy. The standard weekly dosage of 50 mg was compared to that based on 1 mg/kg body weight; no significant differences were found. The rapidly absorbed aqueous thiomalate was compared to the slowly absorbed oil repository thioglucose; the latter produced significantly less side effects and an appreciably higher percentage of improvement. Almost half (43%) of nonresponders on standard regimen had a satisfactory clinical response at higher dosage levels without increase in toxicity. Some of these findings vary so much with traditional beliefs and practices that the authors urge caution in their interpretation. But generally speaking these problems are technical and do not detract from the conviction that chrysotherapy is valuable and comparatively safe in the management of rheumatoid arthritis and that it deserves more widespread application in clinical practice.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗