Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Nilsson

Publications and source records attributed to N Nilsson.

44 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Active range of motion in the cervical spine increases after spinal manipulation (toggle recoil).

BACKGROUND: It has generally been assumed that spinal manipulation has the biomechanical effect of increasing spinal range of motion. Past research has shown that there are likely no lasting changes to passive range of motion, and it is unclear whether there is an increase in active range of motion after manipulation. OBJECTIVE: To study changes in active cervical range of motion after spinal manipulation of the cervical spine. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized controlled trial at the outpatient clinic Phillip Chiropractic Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: One hundred five patients with cervicogenic headache were randomized into 2 groups. After a baseline observation period, Group 2 received manipulation (toggle recoil) to the cervical spine, whereas Group 1 received sham manipulation. In the next trial phase, Group 1 received manipulation, whereas Group 2 received no treatment. This was followed by the final trial phase, in which Group 2 received sham manipulation and Group 1 received no treatment. After each trial phase, active range of cervical motion was measured with a strap-on head goniometer by 2 blinded examiners. RESULTS: After receiving spinal manipulation, active range of motion in the cervical spine increased significantly (P < .0006) in Group 2 compared with Group 1, and this difference between the treatment groups disappeared after the third trial phase in which Group 1 also received manipulation, as expected. CONCLUSION: Spinal manipulation of the cervical spine increases active range of motion.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Lasting changes in passive range motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To study whether a 3-wk series of spinal manipulation has any lasting effect on passive cervical range of motion. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial with a blind observer. SETTING: Ambulatory outpatient facility in an independent National Health Service funded chiropractic research institution. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine headache sufferers who, on entering the study, displayed objectively decreased passive cervical range of motion. These subjects were recruited from 400 headache sufferers who responded to newspaper advertisements. INTERVENTION: Half of the group received high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical manipulation twice a week for 3 wk. The other half received low-level laser in the upper cervical region and deep friction massage in the lower cervical/upper thoracic region, also twice a week for 3 wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Goniometrically assessed passive range of motion of the cervical spine. RESULTS: Although passive cervical range of motion increased in both groups during the trial period, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups 1 wk after the last treatment. CONCLUSION: It seems that any changes in passive range of motion after spinal manipulation are of a temporary nature.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the natural variation of the active and passive cervical range of motion (ROM) in asymptomatic subjects over a 3-wk period. STUDY DESIGN: One-way repeated measures of active and passive cervical ROM. SETTING: Institute of Medical Biology (Center of Biomechanics) at Odense University, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Forty asymptomatic students from the University of Odense. Male/female ratio, 20:20; mean age, 23.9 yr (range, 20-30 yr). INTERVENTION: Measurements of the active and passive cervical ROM were taken using the electrogoniometer CA-6000 Spine Motion Analyzer. Each subject was measured six times during a 3-wk period. The measurements were performed at the same time of the day. The device gives the maximum end ROM for the motion plane examined. RESULTS: The natural variation in active and passive ROM was found to be in the order of chi +/- 20 degrees for flexion/extension, chi +/- 12 degrees for lateral flexion and chi +/- 14 degrees for rotation. CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic subjects, the individual natural variation is quite large for active and passive cervical flexion/extension, lateral flexion and rotation. When measuring individual patients, one should allow for a natural variation of 12-20 degrees.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Postural changes of the cervical spine in patients with nontoxic goiter.

PURPOSE: To investigate differences in cervical spine posture and range of motion and self-reported neck pain and headache between patients with nontoxic goiter compared with a matched control group. DESIGN: An observational, controlled, blinded study. SETTING: The ambulatory outpatient facility of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five nontoxic goiter patients and 25 matched nongoiterous control subjects from the Department of Endocrinology. INTERVENTION: Participants were X-rayed from a lateral position in neutral, full flexion and full extension, and the radiographs were evaluated by a blinded examiner for anterior head carriage, maximal flexion, maximal extension and the extent and severity of any degenerative changes in the cervical spine. The degree of postural neck muscle tenderness was evaluated by a blinded rheumatologist using a validated Total Tenderness Score system. In addition, the two groups were compared for their self-reported frequency of neck pain and headaches. RESULTS: A significant increase in anterior head carriage was found among the goiter patients (p = .01), together with a corresponding decrease in flexion (p = .01), whereas the corresponding increase in extension was not statistically significant (p = .16). A higher prevalence of headaches was found in the goiter group (p = .06), but there was no difference in neck muscle tenderness (p = .40) or frequency of neck problems (p = .40) between the groups. The severity of degenerative changes in the cervical spine (p = .22) and the number of vertebral levels with degenerative changes (p = .13) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Goiters of > 100 g seem to alter the posture of the cervical spine, possibly resulting in a tendency for more frequent headaches. The changes do not seem to cause more neck pain, muscle tenderness or degeneration of the cervical spine.

Adolescent↗