Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

N Mays

Publications and source records attributed to N Mays.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical governance. Onus points.

A survey of lead GPs in total purchasing pilots revealed poor understanding of the responsibilities of clinical governance. Many saw it in a negative light and were concerned about its administrative costs. Explicit guidance is needed, spelling out the clinical governance responsibilities of GPs and others in primary care groups.

Attitude of Health Personnel

Primary care groups. Growing pains.

The management costs of primary care groups are likely to be higher than envisaged. Duplication of all functions in all PCGs is likely to be more expensive than current health authority commissioning arrangements. In the long term, the most effective deployment of management costs will depend on deciding which PCG commissions what.

Budgets

Evaluation of total purchasing pilots in England and Scotland and implications for primary care groups in England: personal interviews and analysis of routine data. The Total Purchasing National Evaluation Team.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reported achievements of the 52 first wave total purchasing pilot schemes in 1996-7 and the factors associated with these; and to consider the implications of these findings for the development of the proposed primary care groups. DESIGN: Face to face interviews with lead general practitioners, project managers, and health authority representatives responsible for each pilot; and analysis of hospital episode statistics. SETTING: England and Scotland for evaluation of pilots; England only for consideration of implications for primary care groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The ability of total purchasers to achieve their own objectives and their ability specifically to achieve objectives in the service areas beyond fundholding included in total purchasing. RESULTS: The level of achievement between pilots varied widely. Achievement was more likely to be reported in primary than in secondary care. Reported achievements in reducing length of stay and emergency admissions were corroborated by analysis of hospital episode statistics. Single practice and small multipractice pilots were more likely than large multipractice projects to report achieving their objectives. Achievements were also associated with higher direct management costs per head and the ability to undertake independent contracting. Large multipractice pilots required considerable organisational development before progress could be made. CONCLUSION: The ability to create effective commissioning organisations the size of the proposed primary care groups should not be underestimated. To be effective commissioners, these care groups will need to invest heavily in their organisational development and in the short term are likely to need an additional development budget rather than the reduction in spending on NHS management that is planned by the government.

Budgets

The impact of the UK NHS purchaser-provider split on the 'rational' introduction of new medical technologies.

This article uses evidence from case studies of the introduction of three new medical technologies to explore the impact of the UK NHS purchaser--provider split on the diffusion of new medical technologies. A desirable policy objective is assumed to be the 'rational' diffusion of medical technologies according to evidence that they are clinically and cost effective. Theoretical mechanisms are identified through which diffusion could be controlled, and the case studies are used to explore the extent to which rational technology diffusion occurs in practice in the NHS. They illustrate the influence of purchasers and providers on the introduction and early use of new technologies and explore the extent to which research about clinical and cost effectiveness is used to inform decisions about technology adoption. The results demonstrate the limited influence of purchasers and the short term clinical and organisational objectives pursued by providers in relation to technology adoption. It is suggested that initiatives to promote rational technology diffusion might be most effective if they are focused on decision making in providers, and if they aim to balance the influence on decisions of administrative and financial information about the technologies with more systematic use of research about clinical and cost effectiveness.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Can primary care and community-based models of emergency care substitute for the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department?

This systematic review assesses the extent to which primary-secondary substitution is possible in the field of emergency care where the range of options for the delivery of care is increasing in the UK and elsewhere. Thirty-four studies were located which met the review inclusion criteria, covering a range of interventions. This evidence suggested that broadening access to primary care and introducing user charges or other barriers to the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department can reduce demand for expensive secondary care, although the relative cost-effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear. On a smaller scale, employing primary care professionals in the hospital A & E department to treat patients attending with minor illness or injury seems to be a cost-effective method of substituting primary for secondary care resources. Interventions that addressed both sides of the primary-secondary interface and recognised the importance of patient preferences in the largely demand-driven emergency service were more likely to succeed in complementing rather than duplicating existing services. The evidence on other interventions such as telephone triage, minor injuries units and general practitioner out of hours co-operatives was sparse despite the fact that these interventions are growing rapidly in the UK. Quantifying the scope for substitution in any one health system is difficult since the evidence comes from international research studies undertaken in a variety of very different health settings. Simply transferring interventions which succeed in one setting without understanding the underlying process of change is likely to result in unexpected consequences locally. Nevertheless, the review findings clearly demonstrate that shifting the balance of care is possible. It also highlights a persistent gap in professional and lay perceptions of appropriate sources of care for minor illness and injury.

Community Health Services

A 3- to 6-year follow-up of former long-stay psychiatric patients in Northern Ireland.

Little is known about the first patients who left hospital before and during the official implementation of the hospital discharge policy in Northern Ireland. This study describes patterns of residential provision for former long-stay patients (approximately two-thirds of whom had an ICD-9 diagnosis of schizophrenia) discharged from the six major psychiatric hospitals in Northern Ireland between 1987 and 1990 (n = 321). It also employs several instruments within a retrospective survey design to examine outcomes for a 35% sample of people (112/321) discharged between 1997 and 1990 and followed up in 1993. Almost two-thirds (61%) had been discharged to independent living or low-staffed statutory settings. None of the group was homeless, one person was in prison and three people had committed suicide during the first 2 years after discharged. Almost one-third had to be re-admitted at some stage during the 6-year period and 13% had died. 'Moderate' to 'major problems' with most daily living skills were reported for less than 25% of people, while 15% or less had problem behaviour. Approximately 90% or more were satisfied with most aspects of their new homes and most also reported feeling happier (77%), healthier (63%) and more independent (78%) since discharge. However, social, recreational and occupational opportunities were limited. Purchasers, providers and practitioners need to review ways in which former long-stay patients might be empowered to live more meaningful and integrated lives in the community, particularly as the current government strategy for health and social well-being (1997-2002) in Northern Ireland points to the closure of existing psychiatric hospitals.

Activities of Daily Living

The cost-effectiveness of community care for adults with learning disabilities leaving long-stay hospital in Northern Ireland.

Among the many questions concerning the replacement of long-stay hospital services with community-based care are those of cost and cost-effectiveness. Is community care more expensive than hospital care? Are levels of expenditure associated with clients' needs and changes in their well-being? By following a cohort of people discharged from seven long-stay hospitals in Northern Ireland, this wide-ranging evaluation was able to address such cost-related questions. Although nearly three-quarters of the sample were living in private sector residential or nursing homes, a six-fold variation in the total costs of support was found. However, at the mean, community care was less expensive than hospital care. For only ten people in our sample of 192 clients did the costs of community care exceed the average cost of long-stay inpatient care. Multivariate analysis revealed that the costs of community care 'packages' were linked to some client needs, but higher spending was not unequivocally associated with better client outcomes. Care in the community is reasonably cost-effective in Northern Ireland when compared with long-term hospital care. However, there is a case for increasing expenditure on community care for people with learning difficulties, to increase use of services provided outside the accommodation and enhance staffing arrangements within the accommodation facilities. Distributing resources appropriately and targeting resources on priority needs through coordination will hep to continue to improve clients' quality of life.

Community Health Services