Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Kraus

Publications and source records attributed to N Kraus.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems.

Children with learning problems often cannot discriminate rapid acoustic changes that occur in speech. In this study of normal children and children with learning problems, impaired behavioral discrimination of a rapid speech change (/dalpha/versus/galpha/) was correlated with diminished magnitude of an electrophysiologic measure that is not dependent on attention or a voluntary response. The ability of children with learning problems to discriminate another rapid speech change (/balpha/versus/walpha/) also was reflected in the neurophysiology. These results indicate that some children's discrimination deficits originate in the auditory pathway before conscious perception and have implications for differential diagnosis and targeted therapeutic strategies for children with learning disabilities and attention disorders.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Auditory development reflected by middle latency response.

The auditory middle latency response (MLR) seems to have a relatively long developmental time course, extending through the first decade of life. Characteristics of each MLR component change developmentally not only with respect to waveform morphology but also with respect to response reliability, dependence on awareness state, and stimulus rate. Both human and animal studies indicate that these complex changes may be a result of multiple generating systems that show multiple time courses of development. This framework has practical ramifications in that clinical and research studies of MLR in young children must take into account the development sequence. Furthermore, it cannot be assumed a priori that research results obtained from adults will apply to young children. The complexity of the process raises intriguing questions regarding the functional development of auditory perception.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Acoustic elements of speechlike stimuli are reflected in surface recorded responses over the guinea pig temporal lobe.

Auditory evoked potentials measured from the guinea pig temporal lobe surface reflect acoustic elements of synthesized speech syllables. Eliciting stimuli included a four formant anchor stimulus /ba/, with a 40-ms formant transition duration. The other stimuli differed from /ba/ along simple acoustic dimensions. The /pa/ stimuli differed on a VOT continuum; /da/ stimuli had a higher frequency F2 onset; /wa/ had a longer (80 ms) formant transition duration; and /bi/ differed in three vowel formant frequencies. The /ba/ and /da/ onset response latencies decreased systematically with increasing F2 onset frequency. The response to the /pa/ voicing increased in latency with increasing VOT and showed a physiologic discontinuity at VOT of 15-20 ms. Responses to /ba/ and /wa/ showed similar onset morphology but significant amplitude differences at latencies corresponding to vowel onset. Significant amplitude differences in /ba/ and /bi/ responses corresponded in latency to both consonant and vowel portions of the syllables. Similar to previous reports in the awake monkey for VOT, these results demonstrate in the anesthetized guinea pig that acoustic elements essential to speech perception are reflected in aggregate response of ensembles of cortical neurons.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Acoustic features and acoustic changes are represented by different central pathways.

The central processing of acoustic stimulus changes can be observed neurophysiologically in the mismatch negativity auditory evoked potential (MMN). Stimuli differing in interaural phase were used to investigate the contributions of the primary and non-primary auditory pathways to the encoding of binaural stimuli and to investigate passively elicited measures of binaural processing in experimental animals. In guinea pigs, the MMN was obtained in response to 1000 Hz tones embedded in white noise (S:N = 2 dB). Using a modified oddball paradigm (that is, two stimuli presented in a series, each with a different probability of occurrence), stimuli were presented binaurally with both the tone and noise in-phase to the two ears (S0N0) as the standard stimulus ans the tone 180 degrees out-of-phase (S(PI)N0) as the deviant stimulus. The MMN, by definition, should occur only in response to a change, or 'mismatch,' between the standard and deviant stimuli. The response to the deviant stimulus in the oddball paradigm was compared to the response to the same stimulus when presented in a series alone. The responses to S0N0 and S(PI)N0 collected in a series alone, termed the intrinsic responses, were also compared. Responses were recorded from two surface epidural electrodes - one at the posterior midline and one over the left temporal lobe. AEPs from these locations have been shown to reflect the activity of primary and non-primary thalamo-cortical pathways respectively. A significant MMN was observed at the midline electrode, but no MMN was observed over the temporal lobe.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1995

Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) is an automatic cortical evoked potential that signifies the brain's detection of acoustic change. In other words, the MMN reflects the neurophysiologic processes that underlie auditory discrimination. As such, the MMN provides an objective tool for evaluating central auditory mechanisms involved in speech perception. We are using the MMN to study the central auditory processes that encode acoustic changes important for speech perception in 1) normal-hearing adults and children, 2) individuals with impaired auditory systems (including persons with learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders, cochlear implants), and 3) an animal model. Specifically, we have demonstrated that the MMN provides information about the central processing of fine acoustic differences, the neuroanatomic pathways that encode acoustic change, central auditory processing in the presence of peripheral hearing deficits, and central auditory system plasticity. In addition, we have considered methodological challenges associated with measuring the MMN in individual subjects. Several methodological issues--including appropriate stimuli, stimulus presentation variables, the recording protocol and environment, and validation of the MMN in individuals--are discussed.

Child↗
PubMed1995

The middle latency response generating system.

In summary, primary pathways are specifically auditory-sensitive, show fine frequency tuning, and good time-locking. The responses are reliable and show substantial binaural interactions. The primary pathway includes the ventral portion of the medial geniculate and the primary auditory cortex. The animal MLR recorded from over the temporal lobe, the temporal response, has been associated with the primary pathway because it is affected by pharmacological inactivation of MGv and electrolytic lesions of the primary auditory cortex. It is a large, reliable, rate-sensitive response, that shows a relatively late development and high degree of binaural interaction. Non-primary pathways are multimodal, broadly tuned, and show only mild binaural interaction. The midline response is associated with the non-primary areas because it is affected by pharmacologic inactivation of MGcm and mRF, but is not affected by inactivation of MGv or lesions of auditory cortex. The midline response is relatively small, labile, and rate-resistant. It develops early and shows only a small degree of binaural interaction. The generation of MLR thus appears to reflect an interplay of primary and non-primary areas in the auditory thalamo-cortical pathway. The non-primary and primary components may be differentiated in numerous ways: by lesions, by stimulus variations, and topographically. The non-primary components appear to develop early and are probably sleep state dependent, while the primary components develop later and are reliable even in sleep. In young children, it is essential to monitor sleep state in order to obtain reliable recordings, leading us to speculate that the non-primary components dominate the MLR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1995

Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients.

The cognitive P300 evoked potential was elicited by speech stimuli in successful cochlear implant recipients, and the resulting P300 morphology was remarkably similar to that of normal-hearing individuals. The P300 was elicited by the synthesized speech pair/da/and/di/ presented using an oddball paradigm to nine "good" Nucleus cochlear implant users and nine age-matched normal-hearing subjects (34-81 yr old). There were no significant differences in P300 amplitude and latency between the two groups. Moreover, the N1 and P2 potentials occurred at similar latencies in the two groups, although the N1 amplitude was significantly smaller in the cochlear implant users. The P300 was absent in one "poor" cochlear implant user. The results suggest that the P300 may serve as a useful tool for evaluating the cognitive aspects of auditory processing in cochlear implant recipients, and that it may aid in assessing the success of cochlear implantation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1994

Binaural response patterns in subdivisions of the medial geniculate body.

Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) to binaural click stimulation were examined in the ventral (MGv) and caudomedial (MGcm) subdivisions of the medial geniculate body (MG) in guinea pigs. Binaural stimulation caused a decrease in amplitude for the response component recorded from the MGv, but an increase in amplitude for the AEP component recorded from the MGcm. Findings suggest that the evoked responses recorded from MGv and MGcm are functionally distinct. The inhibitory binaural response (BR) pattern seen in MGv was similar to that of the middle latency response (MLR) component recorded over the temporal cortex, while the additive BR pattern typical of the MGcm was similar to that of the surface midline MLR component. Furthermore, these data imply that the binaural response patterns seen in the primary and non-primary auditory cortex may be processed and encoded at the thalamic level. It is concluded that the distinct BR patterns noted for the two MG subdivisions reflect the predominant type of binaurally responsive neurons within the respective pathways.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1994

Discrimination of speech-like contrasts in the auditory thalamus and cortex.

The neurophysiologic discrimination of acoustic contrasts was investigated as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) response. Evoked responses were recorded from guinea pig thalamus (medial geniculate nucleus) and epidural surface in response to synthesized speech contrasts /ga/-/da/ and /ba/-/wa/. From the caudomedial portion of the medial geniculate nucleus, /ba/-/wa/ elicited a strong mismatch response, whereas /ga/-/da/ did not. Neither stimulus contrast elicited an MMN from the ventral, or primary, portion of medial geniculate. Both stimulus contrasts elicited an MMN from the midline surface. Neither contrast elicited an MMN from the surface over the temporal lobe. Results indicate a hierarchy of processing of the spectrotemporal changes which characterize formant transitions. Also, results indicate that the nonprimary portions of the auditory pathway contribute substantially to the MMN.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Nonprimary auditory thalamic representation of acoustic change.

1. The mismatch response, or mismatch negativity (MMN), is a neurophysiologic response to stimulus change. In humans and other animals, the MMN may underlie the ability to discriminate acoustic differences, a fundamental aspect of auditory perception. 2. This study investigated the role of the thalamus in the generation of a tone-evoked MMN in guinea pigs. Electrodes were placed in the caudomedial (nonprimary) and ventral (primary) subdivisions of the auditory thalamus (medial geniculate nucleus). Surface epidural electrodes were placed at the midline and over the temporal lobe. The MMN was elicited by a deviant stimulus (2,450-Hz tone burst) embedded in a sequence of standard stimuli (2,300-Hz tone bursts). 3. A tone-evoked MMN was present in nonprimary thalamus but was absent in the primary thalamus. Surface-recorded MMNs were measured at the midline but not over the temporal lobe. The correspondence between nonprimary thalamic responses and midline surface potentials, and between primary thalamic responses and temporal surface potentials, is consistent with data reported for the auditory middle latency responses in guinea pigs. 4. The results demonstrate that the nonprimary auditory thalamus contributes to the generation of a tone-evoked MMN in the guinea pig. Furthermore, the data indicate that the guinea pig is a feasible model for investigating central auditory processes underlying acoustic discrimination.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1993

The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users.

The mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential is a non-task related neurophysiologic index of auditory discrimination. The MMN was elicited in eight cochlear implant recipients by the synthesized speech stimulus pair /da/ and /ta/. The response was remarkably similar to the MMN measured in normal-hearing individuals to the same stimuli. The results suggest that the central auditory system can process certain aspects of speech consistently, independent of whether the stimuli are processed through a normal cochlea or mediated by a cochlear prosthesis. The MMN shows promise as a measure for the objective evaluation of cochlear-implant function, and for the study of central neurophysiological processes underlying speech perception.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1993

Clinical implications of primary and nonprimary pathway contributions to the middle latency response generating system.

Clinical use of the middle latency response (MLR) has been limited by the variability of the response during sleep in young children. Theoretically, this variability can be explained by the differential maturation of the primary and nonprimary components of the MLR generating system. The model is supported by animal neurophysiological data. Applied to the human system, the model predicts that, in children, MLR generators are active only during certain stages of sleep. From a clinical standpoint, this has led to a procedure for signaling the clinician when a child is in a sleep state favorable for recording the MLR.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1993

Improving the reliability of the auditory middle latency response by monitoring EEG delta activity.

The auditory middle latency response (MLR), a useful tool in the assessment of low-frequency auditory sensitivity, can be consistently recorded in young children during wakefulness, stages 1 and 2, and REM sleep. Responses are often absent or questionable during stage 4. An on-line measure indicating favorable periods for recording MLR during sleep is important for interpretation of absent potentials. Here, for children 5 to 7 years old, the reliability and detectability of MLR was compared to sleep state and the dominance of delta activity (0-3 Hz) in the EEG frequency spectrum. Dominance of delta activity, a characteristic of stage 4, was expressed in a "delta ratio," a measure of relative EEG energy in the 0 to 3 Hz frequency spectrum. A fixed delta ratio (DR = 9) allowed the differentiation of periods favorable for MLR. MLR wave Pa amplitude and latency also varied with delta ratio. Results indicate that on-line monitoring of the delta ratio will allow reliable testing of MLR in clinical situations.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1993

Mismatch negativity in the neurophysiologic/behavioral evaluation of auditory processing deficits: a case study.

The subject of this case report is an 18-year-old woman with grossly abnormal auditory brain stem response (ABR), normal peripheral hearing, and specific behavioral auditory processing deficits. Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) and cortical potentials N1, P2, and P300 were intact. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was normal in response to certain synthesized speech stimuli and impaired to others--consistent with her behavioral discrimination of these stimuli. Behavioral tests of auditory processing were consistent with auditory brain stem dysfunction. A neuropsychological evaluation revealed normal intellectual and academic performance. The subject was in her first year of college at the time of the evaluation. This case study is important because: (1) Although there have been several reports of absent/abnormal ABR with preserved peripheral hearing and deficits in auditory processing, little is known about the specific nature of the auditory deficits experienced by these individuals. Such information may be valuable to the clinical management of patients with this constellation of findings. (2) Of interest is the information that the mismatch negativity (MMN) cortical event-related potential can bring to the evaluation of patients with auditory processing deficits. The MMN reflects central auditory processing of small acoustic differences and may provide an objective measure of auditory discrimination. (3) From a theorectical standpoint, a patient with neural deficits affecting specific components of the auditory pathway provides insight into the relationship between evoked potentials and physiological mechanisms of auditory processing. How do various components of the auditory pathway contribute to speech discrimination? How might evoked potentials reflect the processes underlying the neural coding of specific features of speech stimuli such as timing and spectral cues?

Achievement↗
PubMed1993

Speech-evoked cortical potentials in children.

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were obtained to synthesized speech stimuli in 16 school-aged children (7-11 years) and compared to responses in 10 adults. P1, N1, and P2 event-related potentials were elicited by the phoneme /ga/. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was elicited by variants of /da/ and /ga/, which differ in the onset frequency of the second and third formant transitions. In general, the well-defined N1/P2 complex characteristic of the adult response, was not found in children. Waves P1 and N1 had longer peak latencies in children than in adults. Wave P2 amplitude was smaller in children than in adults. In contrast to the often poorly delineated earlier cortical potentials, the MMN was well defined in children. Significant MMNs were obtained in all subjects tested. MMN magnitude (peak amplitude and area) was significantly larger in the children. No significant differences were found in peak latency and duration of the MMN in children compared to the adult response. Another negative wave occurring at 400 msec was also observed in response to the deviant stimuli. This negative wave occurred at a similar latency in adults and children and was significantly larger and more robust in children. Results support the view that development of ERPs does not involve a hierarchical process with respect to latency. That is, earlier occurring waves do not necessarily mature before later occurring waves. The latencies of P1, N1, and P2 and overall morphology of these waves may provide a measure of maturation of central pathways. The early development of the MMN, its apparent robustness in school-aged children, and its reflection of the processing of acoustic differences in speech stimuli suggest its possible use in the assessment of central auditory function.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

Reticular formation influences on primary and non-primary auditory pathways as reflected by the middle latency response.

Ongoing studies are aimed at identifying the neural pathways responsible for the middle latency response (MLR). These studies involve the analysis of surface and intracranial potentials following pharmacologic inactivation (with lidocaine) of discrete regions of the guinea pig brain. Previous investigations have shown that MLR surface waves recorded over the temporal lobe originate from pathways anatomically and functionally distinct from those that generate MLR waves recorded over the midline, and that both primary and non-primary auditory thalamo-cortical pathways contribute to the guinea pig MLR. The present investigation examines the role of the mesencephalic reticular formation (mRF) in the MLR generating system. Inactivation of the mRF was associated with disruption of the midline response. These waves have been shown to reflect activity from non-primary subdivisions of the thalamo-cortical pathway. Components recorded over the temporal lobe were also affected, consisting of amplitude reduction and latency prolongation without changes in response morphology. Changes in temporal MLR components with mRF inactivation were smaller than those associated with direct inactivation of primary and non-primary subdivisions of the medial geniculate body. These findings indicate that mRF input is essential for normal generation of those components of the MLR thought to reflect both primary and non-primary auditory pathway activity.

Animals↗