Rapid viral diagnosis.
There has been much interest and activity in the development of techniques for rapid viral diagnosis which would allow successful intervention in the treatment of patients or their contacts or in the control of viral diseases in the community. The greatest emphasis has been on techniques that permit viral detection directly in the clinical specimen, since these avoid the need to cultivate the agent, are feasible for detection of viruses that cannot be cultivated, and can detect virus in specimens in which the agent is no longer infectious. Direct methods used for viral detection include electron microscopy and various immunoassays which are based on demonstrating reactivity of viral antigen in the specimen with known viral antisera. The use of immunoassays for more rapid identification of viruses isolated in laboratory host systems and for selective detection of viral antigen in inoculated cell cultures even before the agents produce an observable effect has been an important advance in viral diagnosis by the approach of isolation and identification. The reliability of all specific viral identification procedures depends on the use of high quality viral antisera. Some of the problems previously encountered in preparing satisfactory viral immune reagents are being overcome through the availability of highly specific monoclonal antibodies produced by cell hybridization techniques. Virus-specific IgM antibody assays for rapid diagnosis have been improved greatly through the use of a "capture" technique in which antibody to the human mu chain is used in the solid phase to separate IgM from other serum components which might compete with IgM antibody or give nonspecific reactivity, and also through the availability of highly specific monoclonal antibodies to the human mu chain. A variety of simple assays for determination of viral antibody status have been developed, and many are commercially available. The reliability of some of these antibody assays has been improved through the incorporation of more suitable controls and through better definition of interpretations which should be made from test results.