Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Freemantle

Publications and source records attributed to N Freemantle.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

The Euro Heart Failure Survey of the EUROHEART survey programme. A survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. The Study Group on Diagnosis of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. The Medicines Evaluation Group Centre for Health Economics University of York.

BACKGROUND: The EUROHEART programme is a rolling programme of cardiovascular surveys among the member nations of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). These surveys will provide information on the nature of cardiovascular disease and its management. This manuscript describes a survey into the nature and management of heart failure. AIMS: The EuroHeart Failure survey aims to describe the quality of hospital care, diagnostic and therapeutic, for patients with suspected or confirmed heart failure in ESC member countries. Patients will be interviewed subsequent to hospital discharge to assess their understanding of their condition, side effects from and their compliance with therapy and their satisfaction with the management for heart failure. The quality of management will be judged against the recommendations contained in the ESC guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. Outcome will be further assessed by repeat interviews in 6-12 months time. A further survey of heart failure in 2001/2002 is also planned. METHODS: A prospective survey of all deaths and discharges from medical (cardiology, internal medicine and geriatric medicine) and cardiac surgical wards to identify patients with heart failure, suspected or confirmed. Approximately 70 hospital clusters, comprising two to six hospitals in each cluster, in 24 member countries of the ESC are conducting the study. At the time of writing, approximately 30000 deaths and discharges have been screened and approximately 4000 patients have been enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: The EuroHeart Survey will allow actual practice to be compared to ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. The surveys and guidelines should prove mutually informative. The main EuroHeart Failure project will be completed by late 2000. However, new centres volunteering to participate in the study (contact corresponding author) may be accepted providing they have the necessary research personnel and provided funding can be agreed for statistical support and administration.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2000

Are beta-blockers effective in patients who develop heart failure soon after myocardial infarction? A meta-regression analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: The great majority of post-infarction studies of beta-blockers were conducted in an era when these agents were widely held to be contra-indicated for the management of heart failure. We now know that beta-blockers are highly effective for the management of patients with chronic stable heart failure. However, there remains uncertainty about their role in the setting of post-infarction heart failure and ventricular dysfunction. AIM: the primary objective in this paper, was to investigate the extent to which heart failure or evidence of major cardiac dysfunction influenced outcome in previous trials of beta-blockers in heart failure after myocardial infarction. METHODS: We assessed the extent to which the inclusion of patients with heart failure or major cardiac dysfunction influenced outcome in randomised trials of long-term use of beta-blockade after myocardial infarction. The primary analysis was to assess the extent to which the proportion of patients included in each trial with heart failure influenced the relative odds of all-cause mortality in the trials. All randomised trials without crossover with treatment lasting more than one month and with 50 or more patients were considered. All those that provided information on the proportion of patients with heart failure or major cardiac dysfunction in the original or subsequent articles were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Overall treatment with a beta-blocker was associated with a 22.6% reduction in the odds of death (95% C1 11-32.3%). There were very few data on the effects of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction in patients with documented left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In the analysis that included heart failure as a factor, treatment with a beta-blocker was associated with a non-significant interaction with the presence of heart failure. However, because the group including heart failure patients were at higher risk, the absolute benefit of treatment with beta-blockers appeared greater in this group. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that the relative benefit of beta-blockers on mortality after a myocardial infarction is similar in the presence or absence of heart failure but that the absolute benefit may be greater in the former. However, as current clinical practice has changed radically from the time when the majority of these trials were conducted, further trial evidence would be desirable.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Sleeping with the enemy? A randomized controlled trial of a collaborative health authority/industry intervention to influence prescribing practice.

AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of a health authority/pharmaceutical company collaborative intervention to influence the choice of proton pump inhibitors METHODS: Randomized controlled trial, with general practices forming the unit of allocation and analysis. RESULTS: Constructive working relationships were achieved with five of six pharmaceutical companies involved. One hundred and two out of 140 practitioners in intervention group practices received at least one visit from an industry representative. There were no reports of representatives operating outside their agreed remit. Prescribing in both the intervention and control group moved towards that recommended by the guidelines but there was no difference between the groups in either the proportion of prescriptions in line with the guidelines or the overall cost. CONCLUSIONS: Health authorities can achieve professional working relationships with the pharmaceutical industry although no changes in practice attributable to the intervention are achieved. Further work is required to develop effective means to influence prescribing in line with independent guidelines especially in the context of the development of Primary Care Groups.

Drug Industry↗
PubMed2000

Implementation strategies.

There is increasing information on the effectiveness of different interventions intended to reduce the gap between clinical practice and what is indicated by evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions. Interventions include behavioural and financial/organizational. Unfortunately, none of the interventions have a substantial impact upon clinical practice. Many interventions that are evaluated are poorly developed, and there are several common methodological weaknesses in many of the evaluations conducted. The paper concludes with a comment on the nature of the market place for health technologies, and suggests that 'implementation interventions' may not be the solution to the problems of the poor uptake of medical research.

Family Practice↗
PubMed2000

Predictive value of pharmacological activity for the relative efficacy of antidepressant drugs. Meta-regression analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the contribution of specific pharmacological properties to the efficacy of antidepressants. AIMS: To assess whether specific pharmacological characteristics of alternative antidepressants resulted in altered efficacy compared to that of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of major depression. METHOD: Meta-regression analysis of randomised trials that compare treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and an alternative antidepressant. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-five randomised trials were included. None of the factors identified a priori predicted a statistically significant improvement in outcome across the trials. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis does not provide evidence that antidepressants acting at more than one pharmacological site differ in efficacy from drugs selective for serotonin reuptake in the treatment of major depression.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗
PubMed2000

The importance of achieving additional drug benefits at a reasonable cost. A review of the fluoxetine years.

Fluoxetine continues to be remarkably successful; greater volumes of this drug are sold than for any other antidepressant in the world. Prozac has also become a household name. In this article we examine the circumstances that surround this success, and the evidence base that supports it. Rather than being a major step forward in the treatment for depression, the evidence for fluoxetine and for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in general suggest at best a modest improvement in tolerability, with no evidence of improved efficacy. We note that the road to success was not problem free for fluoxetine, and highlight the response of the sponsor in the development of subsequent drugs for CNS disorders.

Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation↗
PubMed2000

Fatal toxicity associated with antidepressant use in primary care.

BACKGROUND: New selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are perceived to be much safer in use than older tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). However, previous assessments of association with fatal toxicity were made too soon after the introduction of the new drugs to permit accurate estimation. AIM: To determine the level of association of antidepressant drugs with fatal poisoning in the treatment of depression. METHOD: National data for England and Wales for three years (1993 to 1995) for fatal poisonings associated with antidepressants were obtained and, together with national primary care data on prescribing, were used to calculate fatality association by antidepressant drug. RESULTS: There were substantial variations between drugs in the level of association with fatal poisoning. Assuming an average treatment episode lasted three months, one fatality is associated with 11,800 treatment episodes of antidepressant use (95% CI = 11,120 to 12,580) when only single substance fatalities are considered. For SSRIs as a group the association was one in 411,800 (95% CI = 243,300 to 1.34 million) and for TCAs one in 8130 (95% CI = 7650 to 8670). However, for one of the newer TCAs, lofepramine, the single substance fatality rate associated with its use was one in 233,700 (95% CI = 124,500 to 1.89 million), which is not statistically significantly different from the SSRIs (P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Estimated death rates associated with specific antidepressants should be compared with caution because drugs may be used selectively in patients with differing severity of depression. The proportion of these fatalities that could be prevented by switching to safer antidepressants is unclear when so few deaths are recorded as accidental; when there is intent to do self-harm the potential for switching to other means is unknown. However, this approach to relative toxicity may remain the best available since it is unlikely that a randomised trial will ever be conducted with a large enough sample size to obtain experimental data. Fatalities from antidepressant poisoning are very rare but if safety is paramount then lofepramine or an SSRI are justifiable treatment choices.

Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation↗
PubMed1999

Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?

CONTEXT: Although physicians report spending a considerable amount of time in continuing medical education (CME) activities, studies have shown a sizable difference between real and ideal performance, suggesting a lack of effect of formal CME. OBJECTIVE: To review, collate, and interpret the effect of formal CME interventions on physician performance and health care outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Sources included searches of the complete Research and Development Resource Base in Continuing Medical Education and the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, supplemented by searches of MEDLINE from 1993 to January 1999. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included in the analyses if they were randomized controlled trials of formal didactic and/or interactive CME interventions (conferences, courses, rounds, meetings, symposia, lectures, and other formats) in which at least 50% of the participants were practicing physicians. Fourteen of 64 studies identified met these criteria and were included in the analyses. Articles were reviewed independently by 3 of the authors. DATA EXTRACTION: Determinations were made about the nature of the CME intervention (didactic, interactive, or mixed), its occurrence as a 1-time or sequenced event, and other information about its educational content and format. Two of 3 reviewers independently applied all inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were then subjected to meta-analytic techniques. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 14 studies generated 17 interventions fitting our criteria. Nine generated positive changes in professional practice, and 3 of 4 interventions altered health care outcomes in 1 or more measures. In 7 studies, sufficient data were available for effect sizes to be calculated; overall, no significant effect of these educational methods was detected (standardized effect size, 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.22 to 0.97). However, interactive and mixed educational sessions were associated with a significant effect on practice (standardized effect size, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.01-1.45). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show some evidence that interactive CME sessions that enhance participant activity and provide the opportunity to practice skills can effect change in professional practice and, on occasion, health care outcomes. Based on a small number of well-conducted trials, didactic sessions do not appear to be effective in changing physician performance.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1999

beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of beta blockers in short term treatment for acute myocardial infarction and in longer term secondary prevention; to examine predictive factors that may influence outcome and therefore choice of drug; and to examine the clinical importance of the results in the light of current treatment. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. SETTING: Randomised controlled trials. SUBJECTS: Patients with acute or past myocardial infarction. INTERVENTION: beta Blockers compared with control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All cause mortality and non-fatal reinfarction. RESULTS: Overall, 5477 of 54 234 patients (10.1%) randomised to beta blockers or control died. We identified a 23% reduction in the odds of death in long term trials (95% confidence interval 15% to 31%), but only a 4% reduction in the odds of death in short term trials (-8% to 15%). Meta regression in long term trials did not identify a significant reduction in effectiveness in drugs with cardioselectivity but did identify a near significant trend towards decreased benefit in drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Most evidence is available for propranolol, timolol, and metoprolol. In long term trials, the number needed to treat for 2 years to avoid a death is 42, which compares favourably with other treatments for patients with acute or past myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: beta Blockers are effective in long term secondary prevention after myocardial infarction, but they are underused in such cases and lead to avoidable mortality and morbidity.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness of computer support for determining optimum drug dose. DESIGN: Systematic review of comparative studies where computers gave advice to clinicians on the most appropriate drug dose. Search methods used were standard for the Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice. SUBJECTS: Comparative studies conducted worldwide and published between 1966 and 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For qualitative review, relative percentage differences were calculated to compare effects of computer support in different settings. For quantitative data, effect sizes were calculated and combined in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The drugs studied were theophylline, warfarin, heparin, aminoglycosides, nitroprusside, lignocaine, oxytocin, fentanyl, and midazolam. The computer programs used individualised pharmacokinetic models to calculate the most appropriate dose. Meta-analysis of data from 671 patients showed higher blood concentrations of drug with computer support (effect size 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.02) and reduced time to achieve therapeutic control (0.44, 0.17 to 0.71). The total dose of drug used was unchanged, and there were fewer unwanted effects of treatment. Five of six studies measuring outcomes of care showed benefit from computer assistance. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that using computers to determine the correct dose of certain drugs in acute hospital settings is beneficial. Computers may give doctors the confidence to use higher doses when necessary, adjusting the drug dose more accurately to individual patients. Further research is necessary to evaluate the benefits in general use.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗