N E Maschinot | Search PubMed

PubMed1994

Improved ventilatory function in burn patients using volumetric diffusive respiration.

BACKGROUND: Volumetric diffusive respiration (VDR) offers theoretical advantages over conventional mechanical ventilation (CV) by using lower airway pressures, recruiting alveoli, and mobilizing secretions. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-eight thermally injured pediatric patients with failing respiratory status were changed from CV to VDR. Data were obtained just before transition for CV and after stabilization on VDR, within six hours of transition. RESULTS: Both ventilation and oxygenation were significantly improved with PaCO2 decreasing from 47 +/- 3 to 39 +/- 11 mm Hg and PaO2 increasing from 105 +/- 8 to 171 +/- 12 mm Hg after transition to VDR. Treatment with the VDR ventilator also resulted in a significant decrease in peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) from 52 +/- 2 to 38 +/- 2 cm H2O. The PaO2 to FiO2 ratio increased from 189 +/- 16 using CV, to 329 +/- 21 using VDR, suggesting an improvement in the ventilation and perfusion matching. Ventilatory efficiency, measured by the PaO2/FiO2/PIP ratio, greatly improved after transition from CV to VDR with fraction of inspired oxygen increasing from 3.9 +/- 0.4 to 10.3 +/- 1.0. Hemodynamic function (blood pressure and pulse rate) were not adversely affected by VDR. CONCLUSIONS: The VDR ventilator is more effective than conventional ventilation for maintaining optimal gas exchange at lower airway pressures in thermally injured pediatric patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Decreased pulmonary barotrauma with the use of volumetric diffusive respiration in pediatric patients with burns: the 1992 Moyer Award.

Pulmonary barotrauma is a frequent, life-threatening complication in the pediatric patient who is treated with mechanical ventilation. The volumetric diffusive respiration (VDR) ventilator, which employs a high-frequency progressive accumulation of subtidal volume breaths in a pressure-limited format with a percussive waveform, is capable of providing adequate gas exchange at lower airway pressures; this theoretically decreases the incidence of pulmonary barotrauma compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CV). The incidence of pulmonary barotrauma since 1988 was evaluated in pediatric patients with burns who were younger than 2 years of age. Twenty-four patients who were treated with only CV were compared with 15 patients who were treated with only VDR. Pulmonary barotrauma was defined as the development of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, or pneumoperitoneum. There were no significant differences between CV-treated and VDR-treated groups (mean +/- SEM) in the patient characteristics of age (15.9 +/- 1.3 months vs 16.6 +/- 1.8 months), weight (11.2 +/- 0.5 kg vs 12.5 +/- 0.7 kg), percent total body surface burn (46.2% +/- 4.9% vs 55.6% +/- 6.2%), percent full-thickness burn (38.1% +/- 5.3% vs 50.0% +/- 6.6%), inhalation injury (40% vs 60%), or total number of days that mechanical ventilation was required (18.2 +/- 4.2 days vs 22.4 +/- 5.9 days); although these parameters show a slightly more severe degree of injury in the VDR-treated group. There was a reduction in the incidence of pulmonary barotrauma when VDR was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Awards and Prizes↗