Familial mental retardation with an incidental balanced t(12;16) translocation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to N D Barber.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The clinical pharmacology of clonidine has been studied using a sensitive specific method of drug analysis and quantitative measures of cardiovascular and other drug effects. The plasma concentration effect relationship for dry mouth and sedation is log linear until a maximum effect is achieved. The relationship of plasma level to hypotensive effect in man and animals shows a positive correlation over a narrow concentration range up to 1.5--2.0 ng/ml. At higher plasma levels a reversal of hypotension occurs with hypertension at concentrations over 10 ng/ml. This "therapeutic window" may reflect actions of clonidine on alpha receptors in the brain stem which lower blood pressure counteracted by peripheral effects of vascular alpha receptors which causes hypertension. Information on the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of clonidine can assist in optimising this form of antihypertensive therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost implications, from the payer's perspective, of the use of nadroparin instead of unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of deep-vein thrombosis. DESIGN: Cost-minimization study. SETTING: Switzerland. MATERIAL: Survey of clinical practice in six Swiss hospitals used to model three treatment regimens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost of treatment ($ US) per patient. RESULTS: Treatment with nadroparin instead of unfractionated heparin would reduce costs by $153 per patient. Treatment with nadroparin instead of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin would reduce costs by $109 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of initial treatment of deep-vein thrombosis is considerably lower with nadroparin than with either of the alternative regimens. Nadroparin reduces costs through greater ease of administration and by reducing the amount of laboratory monitoring. Treatment with nadroparin might also allow patients to be discharged from the hospital more quickly than is possible with intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin.