Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Broeders

Publications and source records attributed to N Broeders.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Hypercholesterolemia is associated with increased kidney graft loss caused by chronic rejection in male patients with previous acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: Whereas acute rejection is the main risk factor for the occurrence of chronic rejection, mechanisms in addition to the donor-specific immune response probably contribute to late allograft failure. In this study, we investigated the possible role of hypercholesterolemia in the incidence of chronic kidney graft loss. METHODS: By using the actuarial method, we retrospectively analyzed the long-term loss of cadaveric kidney grafts in patients who had a functioning graft at 1 year and had received a transplant and undergone cyclosporin A therapy in our center between 1983 and 1997. RESULTS: As observed previously, patients with acute rejection during the 1st posttransplant year (n=198) had significantly higher actuarial graft loss at 10 years compared with those free of acute rejection (n=244). In patients free of acute rejection at 1 year, hypercholesterolemia (> or =250 mg/dl) had no impact on graft loss at 10 years. On the contrary, in patients with previous acute rejection, those with hypercholesterolemia (n=59) had a higher immunological (36.0% vs. 19.2%; P<0.01) and overall (50.0% vs. 25.3%; P<0.01) graft loss at 10 years compared with patients with serum cholesterol <250 mg/dl (n=139). Among patients with 1st year acute rejection, hypercholesterolemia was associated with a significant increase in graft loss in male but not in female recipients. Multivariate analysis confirmed that hypercholesterolemia was an independent risk factor for chronic graft loss in male patients (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Hypercholesterolemia is an independent risk factor for kidney graft loss from chronic rejection in male patients with previous acute rejection. Correction of hypercholesterolemia could help to reduce kidney graft loss caused by chronic rejection in this category of patients.

Acute Disease↗

Fibrate-induced increase in blood urea and creatinine: is gemfibrozil the only innocuous agent?

BACKGROUND: Some reports indicate that fibrates can induce renal dysfunction. However, the clinical characteristics of these episodes, and the respective nephrotoxicity of the four main fibrates used-namely, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, and gemfibrozil-remain ill defined. METHODS: To better characterize this side-effect, we first reviewed the charts of 27 patients from our institution who developed an impairment of renal function during fibrate therapy. We next analysed the articles (n=24) that contained data on renal function in patients taking fibrates (n=2676). RESULTS: Among our 27 patients, 25 were on fenofibrate therapy, one was taking bezafibrate, and one ciprofibrate. Nineteen were recipients of solid-organ transplants (kidney recipients, n=15; heart or heart-lung recipients, n=4), and eight were non-transplanted patients with some impairment of renal function. Baseline plasma creatinine ranged from 0.9 to 2.9 mg/dl. It increased by a mean of 40% after the start of fibrate therapy. There was a concomitant increase of blood urea values (mean 36%) in most of the patients. Renal function returned to baseline in 18/24 patients after fibrate discontinuation. However, six patients, all transplant recipients, experienced a permanent increase in plasma creatinine. The incidence of fibrate-induced renal dysfunction among our series of kidney transplant recipients was 60%, as it occurred in 15 of the 25 patients who had ever taken fibrates. An increase of mean creatinine values during therapy was described in all papers on fenofibrate (n=7) and bezafibrate (n=8) (range 8-18% and 8-40% respectively), and in three of four papers dealing with ciprofibrate (range 6-16%). No significant renal impairment was described in any of the eight articles reporting data on gemfibrozil therapy. CONCLUSION: Therapy with fenofibrate, bezafibrate, and ciprofibrate may induce renal dysfunction. Gemfibrozil appears to be devoid of this side-effect.

Bezafibrate↗

Mycophenolate mofetil, together with cyclosporin A, prevents anti-OKT3 antibody response in kidney transplant recipients.

OKT3 monoclonal antibody, a murine IgG2a monoclonal antibody targeting the T cell CD3 antigen, elicits a neutralizing humoral response in 20 to 50% of kidney transplant recipients when the concomitant immunosuppression consists of CsA-Sandimmun (SAND) and azathioprine (AZA). In the present study, we investigated the impact of the newer agents, CsA-Neoral (NEO) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on OKT3 sensitization. Sixty-two consecutive kidney transplant recipients received prophylactic OKT3 (5 mg/d) from days 0 to 13, together with steroids. Concomitant immunosuppression consisted of either AZA + SAND (n=20), AZA + NEO (n=31), or MMF + NEO (n=11). The following doses were used: AZA, 2 mg/kg per d from days 0 to 13, then 1 mg/kg per d; MMF, 2 g/d starting on day 1; and CsA, either SAND or NEO, 6 mg/kg per d from day 6. At least two serum samples per month were available during the initial 3 mo for each patient. IgG anti-OKT3 antibodies were first evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were considered sensitized if their serum scored positive at a dilution > or = 1/1000. Peak titers of IgG anti-OKT3 antibodies and the incidence of patients harboring neutralizing anti-idiotypic antibodies were also determined. A first reduction in OKT3 sensitization was seen in patients receiving Neoral instead of Sandimmun (AZA + SAND: 10 of 20 [50%] patients sensitized versus 6 of 31 [19%] in the AZA + NEO group; P=0.03). This was probably related to the achievement of higher mean CsA trough blood levels in the NEO group during the first month (253+/-44 versus 186+/-49 ng/ml in SAND patients). Peak antibody titers and the proportion of patients with anti-idiotypic antibodies were similar in the AZA + SAND and AZA + NEO groups. A further reduction in the sensitization rate was observed with the replacement of AZA by MMF (MMF + NEO: 0% sensitized patients; P=0.0013). It is concluded that the combination of CsA-Neoral and MMF efficiently prevents sensitization against OKT3.

Adult↗

[Mycophenolate mofetil].

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes. The use of MMF in renal transplantation significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in the first year after transplantation. The main toxicities of MMF are the occurrence of diarrhea and leucopenia. This potent immunosuppressive agent is devoid of the nephrotoxicity of cyclosporin and of the multiple adverse effects of corticosteroids. Clinical trials are currently in progress to assess whether the use of MMF will allow the discontinuation of cyclosporine or corticosteroid therapy without leading to an increased risk of rejection. If results were positive, MMF would represent a significant advance in the field of renal transplantation.

Acute Disease↗

A previously undescribed side effect of icodextrin: overestimation of glycemia by glucose analyzer.

OBJECTIVE: Serious discrepancies between glycemia measurements obtained with an Accutrend Sensor (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) type analyzer (based on a glucose dehydrogenase enzymatic reaction) and measurements obtained in the laboratory by a reference method (hexokinase) have been found in an insulin-requiring, diabetic, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patient treated with icodextrin 7.5% (Extraneal; Baxter Healthcare SA, Castlebar, Ireland), a new osmotic agent for peritoneal dialysis. We therefore investigated the respective role of the Analyzer and of the glucose polymer in this hitherto undescribed problem. DESIGN: Glycemia was measured simultaneously on venous blood using a reference laboratory technique, and on capillary blood using the Accutrend Sensor glucose analyzer in three groups of CAPD patients: 6 patients on Extraneal for at least 1 week, 6 patients receiving their first Extraneal exchange, and 8 patients never exposed to Extraneal. In the first group of patients, glycemia was also measured with another analyzer (Glucocard; Menarini Diagnostics, Firenze, Italy) using a different enzymatic reaction (glucose oxidase). In a separate study, whole blood of a normal subject was spiked with concentrated solutions of glucose and icodextrin and some of its metabolites (maltose, maltotriose, maltopentaose). Once again, comparative measurements of glycemia were performed with the Accutrend Sensor, with two other kits using a glucose dehydrogenase enzyme reaction, and with the hexokinase reference method. RESULTS: In 6 CAPD patients treated with once-daily exchanges with Extraneal for a minimum of 7 consecutive days, we confirmed overestimation of glycemia by the Accutrend Sensor of 65 +/- 26 mg/dL compared to reference values (p < 0.01), and of 69 +/- 25 mg/dL (p < 0.001) compared to measurements obtained with the Glucocard monitor. In 6 other CAPD patients studied at the end of one single icodextrin exchange, overestimation of 61 +/- 11 mg/dL was already present (p < 0.001). On the other hand, in 8 CAPD patients never treated with icodextrin, there was no discrepancy between the Accutrend Sensor readings and reference values. The measurements in spiked blood confirmed that only the Accutrend Sensor overestimates glycemia in the presence of maltose and glucose polymers. The overestimation decreased as the molecular size of the saccharides added to blood increased. There was no overestimation when other kits using a dehydrogenase enzyme were tested. CONCLUSION: The overestimation observed is probably related to the presence of oligosaccharides (mainly maltose), derivatives of glucose polymers present in Extraneal and absorbed via the peritoneal route, in the blood of patients treated with icodextrin. The glucose dehydrogenase characterizing the Accutrend Sensor, an enzyme of the pyrroloquinolinequinone class, very likely reacts with the free reducing group of the glucose molecule located at the end of each saccharide chain. This would not be the case for the Glucocard monitor using glucose oxidase, for other kits using glucose dehydrogenase, and for the reference method based on hexokinase. The Accutrend Sensor type of analyzers are therefore not suitable for regular monitoring of glycemia in diabetic PD patients treated with icodextrin.

Aged↗