Planning the family physician workforce.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Education, Medical, Graduate↗
Biomedical subjects
N B Kahn
Publications and source records attributed to N B Kahn.
Family medicine faculty recruitment crisis of the '90s.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Faculty, Medical↗
Medical schools can indeed produce family physicians.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Education, Medical↗
Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 1995-1996 and 3-year summary.
This is the 15th report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 14.6% of the 16,124 graduates of US medical schools between July 1994 and June 1995 were first-year family practice residents in October 1995, compared with 13.4% in 1994 and 12.3% in 1993. This is the highest percentage since 1980-1981 (12.8%), when this series of studies began. Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were almost twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents in October 1995 than were residents from privately funded schools, 18% compared with 9.7%. The West North Central region reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1995 at 24.8%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions continued with the lowest percentages at 7.6% and 9.3%, respectively. Approximately one in two medical school graduates (46.7%) entering a family practice residency program as first-year residents in October 1995 entered a program in the same state where they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP began reporting this information. The average percentage for each medical school for the last 3 years is reported. In addition, the number and percentage of graduates from colleges of osteopathic medicine who entered Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs are reported.
Censuses↗
Results of the 1996 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.
The results of the 1996 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) set records in the number of positions filled in family practice residencies, with a 10.8% increase over 1995 (2,840 vs 2,563) and a 9.4% increase in positions filled with US seniors (2,276 vs 2,081). This is the largest number of US seniors choosing family practice in the history of the NRMP. A total of 196 (6.7%) more positions were offered in family practice through the NRMP, compared with 1995 (3,137 vs 2,941). Thus, 195 of these additional 196 positions were filled with US seniors. In keeping with the trend begun in 1992, 242 more positions were filled on July 1, 1996, than 1995 (3,494 vs 3,252), for a fill rate of 97.8%. Internal medicine residencies matched 67 fewer US seniors in 1996, while pediatric residencies matched 85 more US seniors. During the past 4 years, family practice has been the choice of 82.6% of the additional US seniors choosing a primary care residency. With continued record increased interest in family practice as a career choice and the need for more family physicians, priority support for the nation's family practice residency programs continues to be of critical importance.
Family Practice↗
The interdisciplinary generalist curriculum project: a national medical school demonstration project.
The United States is facing the challenge of producing more generalists for the physician workforce. The Primary Care Organizations' Consortium (PCOC) has responded by focusing on how medical education can be modified to enhance and support medical students' interest in and commitment to generalism early in their training. Evolving from PCOC's developmental work, the five-year Interdisciplinary Generalist Curriculum (IGC) Project was developed to encourage the nation's schools of medicine and colleges of osteopathic medicine to implement interdisciplinary generalist curricula in the preclinical years. Funded by the Division of Medicine in the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the IGC Project has successfully developed and implemented a nationally competitive medical school demonstration project. Thirty-three schools submitted proposals for an IGC Project award; nine were selected for site visits, from which five were chosen to receive three-year awards. Rigorous attention to creating and maintaining an interdisciplinary focus has characterized the first phase of the IGC Project. Shared leadership among the Executive Committee's project director and two project codirectors and parity in representation among the three disciplines of family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics on the Advisory Committee have formed a critical foundation for interdisciplinary functioning within the project. Growing national interest in generalist training and other funding initiatives have contributed to acceptance of the IGC Project. The high level of interest in the IGC Project and the successful interdisciplinary collaboration during the first phase would indicate that the interdisciplinary process can be replicated to move the nation's medical education institutions toward the production of needed generalist physicians.
Curriculum↗
Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residences: 1994-1995 and 3-year summary.
This is the 14th report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 13.4% of the 15,620 graduates of US medical schools between July 1993 and June 1994 were first-year family practice residents in October 1994, compared with 12.3% the previous year. This is the highest percentage since 1980-1981, when this series of studies began. Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were almost twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents in October 1993 than were residents from privately funded schools, 16.4% compared with 9.0%. The West North Central region reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1994 at 20.1%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions continued with the lowest percentages at 7.5% and 8.7%, respectively. At least one in four graduates from 12 medical schools during the reporting period was in a family practice residency program in October 1994, compared with nine in October 1993 and only two medical schools in 1992. Approximately one in two medical school graduates entering a family practice residency program as first-year residents in October 1994 entered a program in the same state where they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP began reporting this information. The average percentage for each medical school for the last 3 years is reported.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Adult↗
Results of the 1995 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.
The 1995 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) results broke records in the number of positions filled in family practice residencies, with an increase of 11.8% over 1994 figures (2,563 vs 2,293) and an increase of 12.5% in positions filled with US seniors (2,081 vs 1,850). This is the largest number of US seniors choosing family practice in the NRMP's history. In keeping with the trend that began in 1992, 7% more positions were filled on July 1, 1995, than were filled at the same time in 1994 (3,252 vs 3,040). Internal medicine residencies matched 74 more US seniors in 1995, and pediatric residencies matched 84 more US seniors. Given the anticipated career choices of students entering residency training in the generalist disciplines (95% of students matching in family practice, 60% of students matching in pediatrics, and 45% of students matching in internal medicine), it is expected that 33.5% of the class of 1995 (Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited medical schools) will practice as generalists. First-year positions offered in family practice through the NRMP increased 6%, and the number of Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs increased 3% (421 vs 410). With continued increased interest in family practice as a career choice and the need for more family physicians, support for the nation's family practice residency programs continues to be of critical importance.
Adult↗
AAFP constructs definitions related to primary care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Family Practice↗
Studying burnout.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Burnout, Professional↗
Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residences: 1993-1994 and 3-year summary.
This is the 13th report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 12.3% of the 15,564 medical school graduates between July 1992 and June 1993 were first-year family practice residents in October 1993, compared with 10.8% the previous year. This is the highest percentage since 1983-1984. Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were more than twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents in October 1993 as were residents from privately funded schools, 15.9% compared with 7.1%. The Mountain region again reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1993 at 19.1%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions continued with the lowest percentages at 7.7% and 6.6%, respectively. At least one in four graduates from nine medical schools during the reporting period was in a family practice residency program in October 1993; only two medical schools had this distinction in 1992. Approximately one in two medical school graduates entering a family practice residency program as first-year residents in October 1993 entered a program in the same state where they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP began reporting this information. The average percentage for each medical school for the last 3 years is reported.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Career Choice↗
Results of the 1994 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.
The 1994 National Resident Matching Program results reveal a 14% increase in positions filled in family practice residencies, compared with 1993 (2,293 vs 2,002) and a 13% increase in positions filled by US seniors (1,850 vs 1,636). Similarly, 9% more positions were filled on July 1, 1994, than 1993 (3,040 vs 2,798). For the first time, in 1994 more than 3,000 first-year residency positions were filled in family practice. One hundred more US seniors matched in internal medicine, and 74 more US seniors matched in pediatrics. Given the anticipated career choices of students entering residency training in the generalist disciplines, it is expected that 31% of the class of 1994 (Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited medical schools) will practice as generalists. An 8% increase in first-year positions offered, and the development of 10% new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs could accommodate 20% of the nation's graduates of LCME- and American Osteopathic Association-accredited medical schools. With increasing interest in family practice careers, increased support for the nation's family practice residency programs is critical.
Accreditation↗
The shortage of generalist physicians and federal funding of graduate medical education.
Graduate Medical Education (GME) payments through the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) represent the largest portion of federal funding in direct support of training for health professionals. Whatever the benefits of these funds, they clearly have not served as a positive factor in addressing the emerging shortfall of generalist physicians. Therefore, a variety of options are being discussed for restructuring the incentives associated with HCFA GME funds. Seven principal alternatives that have been proposed to address these problems are the following: modification of hospital GME payments, GME payments to medical schools, GME payments to residency programs, GME transfers through Medicare part B, GME transfers to the Health Resources and Service Administration, GME transfers to states through block grants, and GME payments to academic consortia. Unfortunately, each of these approaches offers substantial disadvantages and faces important opposing constituencies. To address these weaknesses, combined strategies and "all payor" federal mechanisms of GME financing have recently been proposed. These compromise approaches have their own administrative and political liabilities as well. Revisions in current HCFA GME payments may be preferable as a first step, but more comprehensive approaches involving all payor financing with mechanisms that reconnect medical school training with primary care practice will likely be required to ensure efficient and effective reform. Such major shifts in the federal funding of GME will not be quick in coming, however, and will doubtless be characterized by a compromise of policy effectiveness with political feasibility.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 1992-1993 and three-year summary.
This is the 12th report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 10.8% of the 15,466 graduates of LCME-accredited US medical schools between July 1991 and June 1992 were first-year residents in family practice in October 1992. This compares to 10.3% the previous year. This is the first increase since 1989. Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were more than twice as likely to be first-year residents in family practice in October 1992 than were residents from privately funded schools, 13.8% compared to 6.4%. The Mountain region reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1992 at 18.3%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions continued with the lowest percentages, 5.6% and 7.8%, respectively. Approximately one in two medical school graduates entering a family practice residency program as a first-year resident in October 1992 entered a program in the same state as that of his or her medical school of graduation. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP has reported this information. The average percentage for each medical school for the last three years is reported. In addition, the number and percentage of graduates from colleges of osteopathic medicine who entered ACGME-accredited family practice residency programs are reported.
Accreditation↗
Results of the 1993 National Resident Matching Program.
The 1993 NRMP results reveal a 19% increase in positions filled in family practice residencies compared to 1992 (2,002 versus 1,658) and a 17% increase in positions filled by US seniors (1,636 versus 1,398). Similarly, 11% more positions were filled on July 1, 1993, than 1992 (2,798 versus 2,530). This confirms a trend begun in 1992 of increased interest in careers in family practice, reversing four years of declining interest from 1988 to 1991. Two hundred one fewer US seniors matched in internal medicine, while 36 more chose pediatrics. Of students entering residency training in the generalist disciplines, it is expected that 27% of the class of 1993 (LCME-accredited medical schools) will practice as generalists. An increase of 9% of first-year positions offered, and the development of 15% new ACGME-accredited family practice residency programs, could accommodate 20% of the nation's graduates of LCME- and AOA-accredited medical schools. With increasing interest in careers in family practice, increased support for the nation's family practice residency programs is critical.
Career Choice↗
Comparison of support services offered by residencies in six specialties, 1979-80 and 1988-89.
The purpose of this study was to determine the availability of each of 19 support services offered by residencies in six specialties in 1988-89 and to compare the results with those of a similar survey performed a decade earlier. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample (576 residencies) of the nation's programs in family practice, internal medicine, obstetrics-gynecology, pediatrics, psychiatry, and surgery. Nearly all responding programs (493) scheduled residents on-call every third night or less frequently. Training programs in all the specialties studied, except pediatrics, offered fewer part-time residencies and, except psychiatry, offered more child care services. Night-shift rotations were used more often in internal medicine, obstetrics-gynecology, and pediatrics programs than in the other specialties. Family practice programs were more likely to offer support groups and various seminar-type experiences. Despite the recent attention to residents' working hours and conditions, many programs in many specialties do not yet offer a variety of commonly utilized, effective support services for residents during training. The authors conclude that with mounting pressure from legislative and regulating bodies, now is the time for the profession to voluntarily incorporate support services for residents into training programs.
Humans↗
Factors influencing family physicians to continue providing obstetric care.
To determine the reasons some family physicians continue to practice obstetrics when most of their colleagues do not, we surveyed family physicians in 26 counties of northern California whose practices include obstetrics and those who have recently discontinued it. In all, 70% of family physicians practicing obstetrics cited enjoying it as a reason for continuing this practice. Over a third of family physicians practicing obstetrics thought that obstetric practice was a responsibility to the community. Only 1 in 6 reported obstetrics to be important in terms of financial implications. Despite this, family physicians practicing obstetrics had a mean gross income derived from obstetric practice of $30,000 above the cost of their total malpractice premium. In contrast, a comparison group of family physicians who had recently discontinued obstetrics cited malpractice insurance costs most frequently as the reason for discontinuing it. Nearly 40% of these physicians indicated that they would be willing to return to obstetrics if circumstances were to change substantially. The most frequently cited change necessary for these physicians to return to obstetrics was a reduction in malpractice insurance rates.
California↗
Financial analysis of a family practice residency threatened with closure.
Family practice residency programs often find themselves needing to fiscally justify their existence to their sponsoring institutions. One such program in a community hospital was threatened with closure, to be replaced by salaried and/or fee-for-service physicians. We present an applied research methodology for comparing the residency budget and revenues with that of a replacement delivery system with no educational mission. The total expenses for nonresidency physicians were projected to be from 10.5% to 25.1% less than the residency budget. Revenues generated by nonresidency physicians were projected to be from 29.4% to 37.6% less than those of the residency, primarily due to the loss of grants and graduate medical education reimbursement through the Medicare program. Proposed reductions in grants and graduate medical education reimbursement threaten the budget/revenue balance of this and other family practice residency programs.
Budgets↗