Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N B Glazer

Publications and source records attributed to N B Glazer.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled study in patients receiving stable insulin therapy.

The glycaemic and lipid effects of treatment with pioglitazone in combination with a stable insulin regimen were evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients (n=566) receiving stable insulin regimens for > or = 30 days yet who had HbA1c > or = 8.0% and C-peptide > 0.7 microg/l were randomised to receive once-daily 15 mg pioglitazone, 30 mg pioglitazone, or placebo in a 16-week multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Per study protocol, the insulin dose was to remain unchanged, but could be decreased in response to hypoglycaemia. At the end of double-blind treatment, patients receiving pioglitazone (15 mg or 30 mg) showed statistically significant mean decreases relative to baseline HbA1c (-1.0 and -1.3, respectively; p<0.0001) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (-34.5 mg/dl [-1.92 mmol/l] and -48.0 mg/dl [-2.67 mmol/l], respectively; p<0.0001); these differences compared with placebo were also significant (p<0.0001). Pioglitazone (15 or 30 mg) yielded significant increases in HDL-C levels (mean increases ranging from +7.1% to + 9.3%) compared with baseline or placebo (p<0.01). The 30 mg dose also significantly reduced mean triglyceride levels (-23.7%) compared with placebo (p=0.0218). No consistent changes in TC or LDL-C levels were observed. The incidence of adverse events was similar in all treatment groups, although the incidences of weight increase, hypoglycaemia and oedema were higher among patients receiving insulin plus pioglitazone. There was no evidence of hepatotoxicity or drug-induced elevations of serum ALT > or = 3 x ULN. Pioglitazone, when added to stable insulin regimens, significantly improved HbA1c and FPG in type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone treatment also provided significant benefit with respect to plasma HDL-C and triglyceride levels. Whether these lipid changes have an impact on overall diabetic complications remains to be determined.

Adult↗

The impact of pioglitazone on glycemic control and atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the glycemic control, lipid effects, and safety of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (n = 197) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > or = 8.0%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > 7.7 mmol/l (140 mg/dl), and C-peptide > 0.331 nmol/l (1 ng/ml) were enrolled in this 23-week multi-center (27 sites), double-blind clinical trial and randomized to receive either a placebo or pioglitazone HCl 30 mg (pioglitazone), administered once daily, as monotherapy. Patients were required to discontinue all anti-diabetic medications 6 weeks before receiving study treatment. Efficacy parameters included HbA1c fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum C-peptide, insulin, triglycerides (Tg), and cholesterol (total cholesterol [TC], high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C]). Adverse event rates, serum chemistry, and physical examinations were recorded. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, pioglitazone significantly (P= 0.0001) reduced HbA1c (-1.37% points), FPG (-3.19 mmol/l; -57.5 mg/dl), fasting C-peptide (-0.076+/-0.022 nmol/l), and fasting insulin (-11.88+/-4.70 pmol/l). Pioglitazone significantly (P < 0.001) decreased insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; -12.4+/-7.46%) and improved beta-cell function (Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA-BCF); +47.7+/-11.58%). Compared with placebo, fasting serum Tg concentrations decreased (-16.6%; P = 0.0178) and HDL-C concentrations increased (+12.6%; P= 0.0065) with pioglitazone as monotherapy. Total cholesterol and LDL-C changes were not different from placebo. The overall adverse event profile of pioglitazone was similar to that of placebo, with no evidence of drug-induced elevations of serum alanine transaminase (ALT) concentrations or hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Pioglitazone improved insulin resistance and glycemic control, as well as Tg and HDL-C - which suggests that pioglitazone may reduce cardiovascular risk for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Adult↗

Safety of insulin lispro: pooled data from clinical trials.

The safety of insulin lispro was compared with that of regular human insulin of recombinant DNA origin (Humulin R, Lilly), with special emphasis on the development and progression of the chronic complications of diabetes mellitus in relation to insulin therapy. Ten clinical trials of 3634 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus were analyzed. The primary focus was treatment-emergent adverse events, and the secondary focus was the development and progression of the chronic complications of diabetes. The evaluations were based on pertinent laboratory values, predetermined disease-specific COSTART (coding symbol and thesaurus for adverse event terminology) terms, physician evaluations of patients, and physical examinations. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events or progression of retinopathy, neuropathy, or cardiovascular disease reported with each therapy. There was no difference between insulin lispro and Humulin R in the occurrence and progression of kidney disease as measured by changes in serum creatinine levels. Pooled data from clinical studies show that insulin lispro has a safety profile comparable to that of Humulin R.

Adolescent↗

The latest developments in insulin injection devices.

The next several years promise dramatic changes in the treatment of diabetes, many of which will be driven by rapidly developing technology. Today's patient with diabetes has ready access to more information about the disease and its treatment options. As a result of this increased knowledge base, insulin-treated patients have become more autonomous in the management of their diabetes and may be better prepared to participate in making informed choices regarding insulin delivery devices. As with any insulin regimen, diabetes educators are encouraged to provide ongoing patient education and follow-up to assure optimal use of these new technologies.

Equipment Design↗