Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N A Kshirsagar

Publications and source records attributed to N A Kshirsagar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

A randomized, crossover, assessor-blind study of the bioequivalence of a single oral dose of 200 mg of four formulations of phenytoin sodium in healthy, normal Indian volunteers.

The objective of the study was to compare the bioavailability of a single oral 200-mg dose of four brands of phenytoin sodium available in the Indian market. Dilantin, Epsolin, and M-toin were compared with Eptoin, which was taken as the reference standard. A randomized, assessor-blind, four-way crossover study was done in 12 healthy Indian volunteers. The study was conducted at a clinical pharmacology ward at King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Mumbai (Bombay). All 12 subjects received a single oral 200-mg dose of all the formulations with a 2-week washout period between the formulations. Blood samples for plasma phenytoin levels were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Safety was measured by pretreatment and posttreatment biochemical investigations, physical examination, and ECG. The pharmacokinetics of the four brands of phenytoin were calculated by maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach C(max) (t(max)), area under the concentration versus time curve for time 0 to 72 hours (AUC(0-72)), and from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0- infinity)). For all brands, 90% CI of all untransformed and log transformed pharmacokinetic parameters failed to remain within prescribed limits of 80% to 120% for untransformed data and 80% to 125% for log transformed data. Since phenytoin obeys Micheles Mentens kinetics, the AUC methodology used for comparison would give only an approximate indication of relative bioavailability. M-toin was shown to be bioinequivalent to Eptoin. The other comparisons indicate but do not prove bioinequivalence of the other brands. The results of the study show that in India switching phenytoin brands could have significant implications and is not advisable once a patient is carefully titrated on one formulation.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Treatment of neonatal candidiasis with liposomal amphotericin B(L-AMP-LRC-1): phase II study.

A liposomal amphotericin B preparation (L-AMP-LRC-1) has been developed and tested successfully in adults by us. This preparation was administered to 23 neonates with candidiasis in an open phase II study. All the 14 assessable patients responded completely to the L-AMP-LRC-1 therapy given at 1 mg/kg for 28 days. Compared to AmBisome, another liposomal formulation of amphotericin B, L-AMP-LRC-1 was effective at lower dose in neonatal candidiasis. Thus L-AMP-LRC-1 appears to be an effective and low cost drug for the treatment of candidiasis.

Amphotericin B↗
PubMed2003

Diagnostic and prognostic utility of rapid strip (OptiMal and Paracheck) versus conventional smear microscopy in adult patients of acute, uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Mumbai, India.

OBJECTIVES: The present study compared the diagnostic and prognostic utility of two rapid tests the (Paracheck and OptiMal) versus conventional smear microscopy. METHODS: Using two independent microscopists we carried out the three tests in 31 adult cases of smear positive, acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. All three tests were done pretreatment, and on Days 8, 15 and 29. RESULTS: Compared to microscopy, the Paracheck had a sensitivity of 100%, while the OptiMal had a sensitivity of 83.7%. The lower sensitivity of OptiMal resulted from misidentification by both microscopists of 6/31 cases as Plasmodium vivax. As a follow up tool, the OptiMal was better than Paracheck, due to the earlier disappearance of the parasite LDH. Also in the Paracheck, between microscopists, there was a significant difference in reading the tests, on Days 8 and 15. CONCLUSION: Our study reiterates, the continued utility of conventional smear microscopy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

A cost-effectiveness analysis of three antimalarial treatments for acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mumbai, India.

BACKGROUND: Malaria is a major public health problem representing 2.3% of the overall global disease burden. The cost of treatment of malaria continues to rise as older drugs and insecticides become less effective and are replaced by more effective, but also more expensive products. METHODS: A post-hoc pharmacoeconomic analysis (direct and indirect costs only) of three antimalarials, chloroquine, mefloquine and co-artemether, was carried out to address the problem of switch to a more expensive first-line antimalarial in the face of growing chloroquine resistance. RESULTS: From the perspective of a large public hospital, it was seen that in an area of high grade chloroquine resistance, the total expenditure on patients who fail chloroquine would exceed the excess expenditure on mefloquine when the RII + RIII resistance exceeded 9%. CONCLUSIONS: Switch to a more expensive drug like mefloquine as a first-line option would be cost-effective when the moderate-severe chloroquine resistance exceeded 9%.

Antimalarials↗
PubMed2002

The use and safety of non-allopathic Indian medicines.

Non-allopathic Indian medicines, referred to elsewhere in the world as complementary and alternative medicine have gathered increasing recognition in recent years with regard to both treatment options and health hazards. Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani and homeopathy are practiced in India as non-allopathic systems. These systems comprise a wide range of therapeutic approaches that include diet, herbs, metals, minerals, precious stones and their combinations as well as non-drug therapies. Ayurveda is the oldest system of medicine in the world and by far the most commonly practiced form of non-allopathic medicine in India, particularly in rural India, where 70% of the population lives. The difference between modern medicine and these systems stems from the fact that the knowledge base of many of the above systems, unlike Western medicine, is based on years of experience, observations, empiricism and intuition and has been handed down generations both through word of mouth and treatises. The focus on non-allopathic systems of medicine in India can be attributed to various causes including a need to revive a rich tradition, the dependency of 80% of the country's population on these drugs, their easy availability, increasing worldwide use of these medicines, the lack of focused concerted scientific research and the abuse of these systems by quacks. Elsewhere, the increasing use of herbal products worldwide and the growth of the herbal product industry has led to increasing concern regarding their safety. The challenges in these non-allopathic systems relate to the patient, physician, regulatory authorities, the abuse/misuse of these medicines, quality and purity issues. Safety monitoring is mandated by a changing ecological environment, the use of insecticides, new manufacturing techniques, an as yet unregulated pharmaceutical industry, the availability of combinations of herbs over the counter and not mentioned in ancient Ayurvedic texts, and the need to look at the active principles of these medicines as potential chemotherapeutic agents. The Indian traditional medicine industry has come a long way from the times when it was considered unnecessary to test these formulations prior to use, to the introduction of Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines for the industry. However, we still have a long way to go. The conflict between the traditional practitioners and the purists demanding evidence of safety and efficacy needs to be addressed. There is an urgent need for the practitioners of the allopathic and non-allopathic systems to work together to optimise the risk-benefit profile of these medicines.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2002

Open label, randomised, comparative phase III safety and efficacy study with conventional amphotericin B and liposomal amphotericin B in patients with systemic fungal infection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional amphotericin B (c-amp B) and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMP-LRC-1-India) in patients with systemic fungal infection in open, randomized, comparative, laboratory blind, phase III safety and efficacy study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Formulation of liposomal amphotericin B - L-AMP-LRC-1, containing natural phospholipids, was prepared and tested at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India. Patients suffering from proven systemic fungal infection, were treated with c-amp B or L-AMP-LRC-1 with 17 patients in each group. Data was compared for the safety and efficacy. RESULTS SAFETY: L-AMP-LRC-1 was better tolerated than c-amp B. Out of the 695 infusions of c-amp B fever occurred on 25.04% occasions in 68.42% patients, while it occurred on 2.09% occasions out of 767 infusions (in 30.43% patients of L-AMP-LRC-1. Chills occurred on 16.83% and 1.17% occasions after c-amp B and liposomal amphotericin B respectively. Other adverse effects observed on 0.2-5% of occasions were: headache, nausea, vomiting, palpitation and dizziness occurring more frequently in c-amp B group. The L-AMP-LRC-1 did not cause bronchospasm at 1 mg/kg dose in a patient who developed bronchospasm to 0.1 mg/kg dose of c-amp B. The L-AMP-LRC-1 was found to be less nephrotoxic than c-amp B and could be administered to patients who had renal problems or had undergone renal transplant. L-AMP-LRC-1 caused less hypokalemia than c-amp B. Effficacy: 17/17 patients in L-AMP-LRC-1 group and 14/17 in c-amp B group had complete response (100% and 82.35% response rate). The number of infusions and dose of amphotericin B and L-AMP-LRC-1 used were similar and required individualization of duration of treatment (in cases where response to fixed duration was not observed). All the patients were treated with 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg/day dose of L-AMP-LRC-1 (except one patient required 2 mg/kg dose). This is markedly different from other marketed liposome and lipid formulations, which are recommended at higher (3-5 mg/kg) doses every day. At the same time L-AMP-LRC-1 being prepared from naturally occurring lipids is expected to cost at least one-third of the marketed formulation. Thus cost of every day treatment would be very much less compared to other delivery systems. Thus L-AMP-LRC-1 will be an economical and safe treatment option available to the physicians for the treatment of systemic fungal infection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

A pharmacoeconomic analysis of the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring in adult patients with generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy.

AIMS: To carry out a retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis of the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in adult patients with generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy in an academic, non profit making organization. METHODS: Twenty-five patients who had undergone TDM were compared with 25 age, disease and duration of drug therapy matched controls who had not undergone TDM. Only direct costs were calculated. These included cost to the hospital of providing the TDM service, cost to the hospital per seizure saved, and cost to the patient per seizure saved. RESULTS: Patients undergoing TDM had much more effective seizure control (P = 0.00032, OR 4.846, 95% confidence interval 1.29,18.3), fewer adverse events, better earning and were more likely to be married than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with adult onset epilepsy, a minimum of two drug estimations per year offers significant benefit in terms of better seizure control, fewer adverse events and greater chances of remission.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Therapeutic drug monitoring in a developing country: an overview.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) was introduced in India in the mid and late 1980s and the last 10 years have seen it grow, together with the growth of separate Clinical Pharmacology departments. The TDM service in the country is broadly of two types: in large teaching hospitals where the service is available through departments of Clinical Pharmacology, and in the private sector, where drug estimations are done by clinical biochemistry departments with minimal interpretation. This article is based on literature review and our own experiences over a 10 year period in a department of Clinical Pharmacology. It focuses on the evolution of TDM, its problems such as lack of funding, special aspects such as the impact of ethnic differences, nutritional deficiencies, quality of medicines and availability of generic products; its utility as a research tool and its future.

Developing Countries↗
PubMed2001

Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B in patients with cryptococcal meningitis.

Four patients with cryptococcal meningitis were successfully treated with liposomal amphotericin B prepared at our institute using Soya phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol. In one patient, response with 1 mg/kg/day treatment was poor. However, on increasing the dose to 2 mg/kg/day, a good response was observed with CSF becoming negative for Cryptococcus neoformans after seven days of this enhanced dose. L-AMP-LRC-1 was found to be well tolerated and a major advantage was observed in two renal transplant patients in whom it could be given safely.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A randomized, parallel-group study in Mumbai (Bombay), comparing chloroquine with chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the treatment of adults with acute, uncomplicated, Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

A major problem in the control of malaria is the development of resistance, of the parasites to the existing drugs and of the vectors to insecticides. With few new drugs in the pipeline, in an era of declining resources, it is imperative to make judicious use of the existing antimalarials. In the city of Mumbai, resistance exists to chloroquine (CQ) and to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). Use of a combination of CQ with SP would theoretically slow down the development of resistance to each of the drugs and increase their useful lives. The effectiveness of this combination in the treatment of adults from Mumbai, who had acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, was compared with that of CQ alone. The combination was found to be significantly more effective, in terms of 28- or 42-day cure rates, and to be more cost-effective.

Acute Disease↗