Bone metastases. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to N A Janjan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The overall approach to pain management encompassed in these guidelines is comprehensive. It is based on objective pain assessments, utilizes both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, and requires continual reevaluation of the patient. The NCCN Cancer Pain Practice Guidelines Panel believes that cancer pain can be well controlled in the vast majority of patients if the algorithms presented are systematically applied, carefully monitored, and tailored to the needs of the individual patient.
Irinotecan (Camptosar) is an active chemotherapeutic agent for lung, gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancers and a potent radiosensitizer. This phase I study was designed to assess the maximum tolerated dose of weekly irinotecan combined with concurrent radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced, unresectable gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal cancer. Patients who received previous chemotherapy (excluding irinotecan) or who experienced recurrent cancer after surgery were eligible for this protocol. The total dose of radiation did not exceed 50.4 Gy (28 fractions of 1.8 Gy each). The starting dose level of irinotecan was 30 mg/m2 infused over 90 minutes given weekly for 5 weeks. Subsequent dose levels were increased in 10 mg/m2 increments to 40, 50, 60, and 70 mg/m2. Of 15 patients who have been enrolled to date, all are evaluable for toxicities and 12 for response. Major hematologic toxicities (grade 3/4) were neutropenia, chills, hemorrhage, and anemia. Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal toxicities included nausea, vomiting, dehydration, anorexia, and constipation. Other severe nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue, hypotension, and hypothermia, as well as cardiovascular toxicities. There was no severe diarrhea and no treatment-related deaths. Of the 12 evaluable patients, 7 (58%) responded, including 2 complete responses; 4 (30%) had no change and 1 had progressive disease. Survival ranged from 1 month to 15 months, with a median survival of 8 months. When the total dose of irinotecan given concurrently with radiotherapy was higher than 250 mg/m2, patients experienced significantly more severe grade 3/4 toxicities than with lower doses (P = .04), with no improvement in response rate. It was concluded that weekly doses of irinotecan of up to 60 mg/m2 with concurrent radiotherapy given over 5 weeks was feasible and demonstrated good response. This regimen did not cause severe diarrhea or pneumonitis, but neutropenia and fatigue were major toxicities. The study continues to accrue.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the rates of tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed. RESULTS: The pathological tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4NI in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor downstaging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. Only 3% of cases had pathologic evidence of progressive disease. Pretreatment tumor size (< 5 cm vs. > or = 5 cm) was the only factor predictive of tumor downstaging (p < 0.04). A decrease of > 1 T-stage level was accomplished in 45% of those downstaged. Overall, a sphincter-saving (SP) procedure was possible in 59% of patients and an abdominoperineal resection (APR) was required in 41 % of cases. Factors predictive of SP included downstaging (p < 0.03), age > 40 years (p < 0.007), pretreatment tumor distance, 3 to 6 cm from the anal verge (p < 0.00001), tumor size <6 cm (p < 0.02), mobility (p < 0.004), tumor stage 6 cm from the anal verge, SP was performed in 14 of the 15 (93%) patients with a CR and 32 of 33 (97%) of patients with residual disease (p < 0.00004). CONCLUSIONS: Significant tumor downstaging results from preoperative chemoradiation allowing sphincter sparing surgery in over 40% of patients whose tumors were located < 6 cm from the anal verge and who otherwise would have required colostomy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation on outcome parameters among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 per day), was given to 117 patients. As determined by pretreatment endorectal ultrasound (EUS), 96% of cases were Stage T3, and 51% had EUS evidence of perirectal adenopathy. Surgery was performed approximately 6 weeks after chemoradiation therapy. Postoperatively adjuvant systemic therapy, consisting of 400-425 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil plus 20 mg/m2 leucovorin for 5 days, was administered every 28 days for six cycles. Outcome parameters of local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (DMC), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were evaluated relative to primary tumor characteristics. RESULTS: The final post-treatment pathological tumor stages were complete response in 27%, Tis-2 N0 in 26%, T2 N1 in 5%, T3 N0 in 21%, T3 N1 in 15%, T4 N0 in 5% and T4 N1 in 1%. Down-staging occurred in 61% of cases. The pretreatment primary tumor size only influenced rates of local control (P < 0.03) and had no other influence on outcome parameters. Pretreatment evidence of perirectal lymph node involvement had no impact on outcome parameters. Pathologic evidence of nodal involvement did affect DMC (P < 0.002) and DFS (P < 0.003). Pathologic evidence of response did influence freedom from the development of distant metastases (P < 0.004). On pairwise analysis this relationship held only when responders were compared to non-responders. No difference was observed based on the level of downstaging at the primary tumor. Correspondingly, DFS was improved when non-responders were compared to downstaged patients (P < 0.01). Response to preoperative chemoradiation failed to affect rates of LC or CSS. For the group as a whole, adjuvant chemotherapy improved only CSS (P < 0.03). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 74 patients, 36 of whom had responded to preoperative chemoradiation. Improvements were only seen in DFS (P < 0.03) when down-staged patients were compared to the non-responders who received adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the DFS rates were lower in the non-responder group who received adjuvant chemotherapy even when they were compared to down-staged patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Consistent with other reports, disease free survival and subsequent development of distant metastases is reduced in the more than 60% of patients who respond to preoperative infusional chemoradiation. Evidence of response appears more significant than the degree of response. At present, no impact is seen on cancer specific survival rates. Consideration should be given for strategies that base selection of subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy on response to preoperative chemoradiation.
BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy for sarcoma of the breast, based on local extension of disease and patterns of failure, remains undefined because of the rarity of the disease presentation. METHODS: Fifty-nine cases of soft tissue sarcoma of the breast were retrospectively reviewed. Cystosarcoma phylloides was excluded from analysis. Surgical intervention consisted of segmental resection (n = 16) or mastectomy (n = 38); five patients underwent excisional biopsy. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered in four patients following segmental resection and in 13 patients after mastectomy. Doses totaled 50 Gy in the majority of patients, and conventional criteria and radiotherapy techniques for adjuvant breast irradiation were used. RESULTS: None of the dissected axillary nodes contained metastatic tumor on pathologic review. Patterns of failure were evaluated. Tumor size (P < 0.03) and surgical margins (P < 0.002) were predictive of local failure (LF). Due to limited patient numbers, no statistical significance was identified with any treatment modality. Following mastectomy alone, LF occurred in 13 patients (34%) versus the 13% rate of LF with mastectomy and radiotherapy (P = NS). Distant metastases developed concurrently with the two local failures in the group that underwent mastectomy and radiation. After segmental mastectomy, LF occurred in 3 cases (25%) concurrent with distant metastases: no LF were noted after segmental mastectomy and radiation (P = 0.27). For all treatment groups, local recurrences were characterized as multiple and involved the chest wall. Local failure occurred in 60% of patients with positive surgical margins who did not receive adjuvant irradiation. Irrespective of surgical margins, over 75% of local recurrences developed among patients treated by surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: The role of radiotherapy for breast sarcoma remains undefined due to the rarity of this disease presentation. This retrospective review failed to demonstrate a statistical benefit for the administration of adjuvant irradiation in sarcoma of the breast, probably because of limited patient numbers. Because large tumor size and positive surgical margins incur a higher risk for LF, radiotherapy is probably indicated in these cases. Axillary dissection obligates the radiotherapist to treat the axilla in order to include all tissues in the surgical bed, and should be avoided to reduce potential treatment related morbidity. Established therapeutic principles and techniques used for both soft tissue sarcoma and breast cancer should continue to be applied.
In treating pancreatic cancer with external-beam radiotherapy, radiation dose given to the tumor volume is largely limited by the tolerance of the normal structures near the disease site, including the kidneys, liver, stomach, small bowel, and spinal cord. The purpose of this work was to investigate whether a coplanar conformal therapy technique with beam optimization could reduce dose to the normal tissues compared to the conventional 4-field technique; and if this was true, whether other beam arrangements were more effective than the 4-field technique in treating pancreatic cancer. In this study, 9 patients who were treated previously for T3N0 or T3N1 pancreatic cancer with external-beam therapy of 30 Gy in 10 fractions were selected. Beam orientations and weights were optimized for 4 to 6 coplanar conformal beams using a simulated annealing algorithm to minimize the kidney volume receiving more than 20 Gy. Optimized plans were compared with standard plans using a 4-field technique with respect to the isodose distributions and dose volume histograms. For the standard 4-field plans giving 30 Gy to the tumor volume, the total kidney volume above 20 Gy ranged from 10% to 35%, with a mean of 22% and a standard deviation of 7%. Optimization of the beam orientations and weights reduced this volume by approximately 2 times without a significant increase of dose to the liver, stomach, and small bowel. This indicated that the radiation toxicity to the kidneys could be reduced substantially by a careful selection of oblique beam angles and weights. Analysis of the optimized plans showed that beam arrangements which involved left and right anterior oblique beams were superior to the conventional 4-field technique for reducing the kidney dose in treating pancreatic cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Sacral chordomas are relatively rare, locally invasive, malignant neoplasms. Despite surgical resection, adjuvant radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, recurrence is common. This study reviews our experience during the last 40 years at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, to determine the effects of various treatment methods on the overall course of this disease process. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed. From 1954 to 1994, 27 patients with sacral chordomas were evaluated at our institution. RESULTS: There were 19 male and 8 female patients, with a mean age of 56 years (range, 27-80 yr). All except one of the patients presented with pain, and 17 of 27 showed evidence of autonomic dysfunction at initial presentation. Based on microscopic examination of surgical specimen margins, surgical procedures were categorized as either radical resection or subtotal excision. All patients underwent at least one surgical procedure, for a total of 67 procedures (28 radical resections and 39 subtotal excisions). Twelve patients underwent one operation, whereas nine underwent two procedures and six underwent more than two operations (range, 3-16 operations). Radiation therapy was used in conjunction with 13 of the 67 surgical procedures. The median Kaplan-Meier estimate of the overall survival time for the entire group was 7.38 years (range, 4 mo to 34 yr). Tumors recurred after 47 of the 67 procedures. The overall disease-free interval for patients undergoing radical resection was 2.27 years for each procedure, compared with 8 months for each procedure for patients treated with subtotal excision (log-rank test for the inequality between the two curves, 19.58; P<0.0001). The addition of radiation therapy prolonged the disease-free interval for patients undergoing subtotal resection (2.12 yr versus 8 mo; log-rank test for the inequality between the two curves, 5.82; P<0.02). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest frequent recurrences in the majority of patients with chordomas. Radical resection is associated with a significantly longer disease-free interval, compared with subtotal removal of the tumor. Addition of radiation after subtotal resection improves the disease-free interval, although radiation therapy can generally be used only once. Based on these findings, we think that, whenever possible, radical resection should be the treatment of choice for sacral chordomas.
Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and concurrent radiation may improve survival following complete surgical resection in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the morbidity and prolonged recovery associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy frequently prevents the timely delivery of postoperative chemoradiation. Therefore, the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) has investigated the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. We have incorporated a standardized approach to pretreatment staging, operative technique and pathologic evaluation. Our initial experience suggests that preoperative chemoradiation is well tolerated and may reduce loco-regional recurrence. Patients treated with rapid-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation had a significantly shorter duration of treatment compared with patients who received postoperative chemoradiation or standard-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation. New and more potent radiation-sensitizing agents such as gemcitabine may further enhance local control. Novel therapies directed at specific molecular events involved in pancreatic tumorigenesis may be incorporated into preoperative and postoperative regimens to attempt to reduce systemic relapse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Patients who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy alone for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head or uncinate process have a median survival of 12 months, and a high incidence of local tumor recurrence (50%-80%) due to the common finding of positive margins following pathologic evaluation of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens. The available prospective and retrospective data suggest improved survival duration and local-regional tumor control when pancreaticoduodenectomy is combined with 5-FU-based chemoradiation. However, the morbidity and prolonged recovery associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy frequently prevent the timely delivery of postoperative chemoradiation. In contrast, chemoradiation delivered prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy is not associated with toxic effects which delay surgery and has not been shown to increase surgical morbidity or mortality. In fact, recent data suggest that pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leaks, the most common major complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy, are decreased in patients who receive preoperative radiation therapy. Current and future multimodality treatment strategies will capitalize on our expanding understanding of tumor growth and metastasis, allowing more effective radiation sensitizing agents to be combined with external-beam irradiation and surgery, followed by the systemic or regional delivery of novel agents that inhibit essential steps in tumor cell growth.
Symptom control is the goal of palliative irradiation. Approximately 1 month is required before symptomatic relief is accomplished with radiotherapy. However, many patients with cancer-related pain do not receive adequate analgesics, and opioids are often not prescribed until patients fail to respond to palliative irradiation. The presenting symptoms of 108 patients who were referred to a multidisciplinary clinic for bone metastases were evaluated with the Wisconsin Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). This validated instrument evaluates the severity of pain using a 0-10 scale; 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. The population comprised 65 men (60%) and 43 women whose ages ranged from 33 years to 81 years; median age was 55 years, and 69% of patients were less than 65 years of age. Despite the presence of metastatic disease, 21% of patients were working full-time outside the home, and 6% were employed part-time outside the home; 13% were homemakers. Only 17 patients (16%) were unemployed. The time since diagnosis ranged from 2 weeks to 23 years; the median time since diagnosis was 22 months, and 30% of patients had been diagnosed with the past 6 months. Pain was a presenting symptom in 74% (N = 80) of patients at diagnosis. At its worst, the pain was rated as severe (levels 7-10) by 78% and intolerable (level 10) in 22% of the patients in the 24 hr prior to the clinic appointment. On average, the pain was rated moderate to severe (levels 4-10) in 79% and severe in 23% of patients. Only 45% of patients experienced good relief from the prescribed analgesics, and 23% of patients indicated that the prescribed analgesics were ineffective. This survey demonstrates that bone metastases incur significant pain that is often undertreated with analgesics before antineoplastic therapy is administered.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the fund of knowledge of and attitudes toward cancer pain management of radiotherapy residents across the nation. METHODS: Radiotherapy (XRT) residents who had completed at least a year of training were surveyed by questionnaire. Residents (n = 10) from a training program who had been given instructional resources in cancer pain management skills were compared with residents from across the nation (n = 61). A validated survey used in national Cancer Pain Initiative Role Model Programs was administered by mail. The survey contained 30 questions that evaluated attitude alone (A), knowledge alone (K), and how attitude affects the application of knowledge (A/K). RESULTS: The residents from the training program scored significantly higher in K (p < 0.005) and A/K (p < 0.04) than did the residents across the nation. No difference in scores evaluating A were detected (p = 0.26). Compared with the baseline knowledge of physicians in practice who had attended a workshop on cancer pain management, the national XRT residents had significantly lower scores in A (p < 0.006) and K (p < 0.001); however, no difference was found in A/K scores. After the workshop, the physicians in practice had significant gains in cancer pain management skills (p < 0.006). When the post-instruction survey was compared with the national XRT resident scores, there were marked differences in A (p < 0.00001), K (p < 0.00001) and A/K (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: XRT residents in the United States are empathetic, but knowledge of cancer pain management is lacking. Instruction in the principles of cancer pain management can make a profound difference in knowledge and attitude. There is a need to recognize cancer pain management as a significant aspect of radiotherapeutic practice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.