Biomedical subjects

Montse Roset

Publications and source records attributed to Montse Roset.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Bayesian regression models for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Recent studies have shown how cost-effectiveness analysis can be undertaken in a regression framework. This contribution explores the use of practical regression models for estimating cost-effectiveness from a Bayesian perspective. Two different Bayesian models are described. The first considers the outcome measure to be a quantitative variable. In the second model the individual outcome measure is a binary variable with value 1 if any objective has been achieved. We describe the implementation of the model using data from a trial that compares two highly active antiretroviral therapies in HIV asymptomatic patients. Data on direct cost and data effectiveness (percentage of patients with undetectable viral load and quality of life) were recorded. If we consider the quality of life as an effectiveness measure, the new treatment is preferred for a willingness to pay more than Euro 142.3 for an increase in the quality of life. For illustrative purposes, if we compare the results with an analogous model that does not include covariates, the critical value becomes Euro 247.4. For the binary measure of effectiveness the control treatment dominates the new treatment.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗

PubMed2004

Clinical patterns over time in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom instability and severity variability.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical course of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains poorly known. In 209 IBS patients meeting Rome II criteria (137 females and 72 males) we evaluated: (1). changes in frequency and intensity of abdominal pain/discomfort, abnormal number of bowel movements, loose or watery stools, defecatory urgency, hard or lumpy stools, straining during bowel movements, and feeling of incomplete evacuation); (2). use of resources, HRQoL, and psychological well being. METHODS: Observational, prospective, multicenter study. Symptoms were registered in a diary over two 28-day periods with an interval of 4 wk; direct resource use and indirect costs were noted weekly. Three HRQoL questionnaires were administered. RESULTS: High-intensity symptoms were present on more than 50% of the days. Sixty-one percent were classified in the same IBS subtype on both occasions (kappa= 0.48), while 49% had the same symptom predominance and intensity (kappa= 0.40). The greatest instability was observed among diarrhea (D-IBS) and constipation (C-IBS) subtypes: only 46% and 51% remained in the same pattern with a tendency to shift to alternating diarrhea/constipation subtype (A-IBS); however, practically no patient changed from D-IBS to C-IBS, or vice versa. The most reliable symptom characteristic was frequency, followed by intensity and number of episodes. Symptom frequency and intensity were directly related to resource use and HRQoL impairment. CONCLUSIONS: IBS symptoms are instable over time and variables in intensity. Many patients with D-IBS or C-IBS move to A-IBS; however, shift from D-IBS to C-IBS, or vice versa, is very infrequent.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2004

Splitting irritable bowel syndrome: from original Rome to Rome II criteria.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other functional bowel disorders (FBD) is based on symptom evaluation. Clinical criteria have changed over time, yielding different proportions of subjects fulfilling diagnostic requirements. According to new diagnostic criteria (Rome II), subjects considered some years ago to have IBS no longer do so. The aim of this article is to evaluate how patients diagnosed as having IBS according to original Rome criteria have been split, and to which clinical diagnosis they belong today. METHODS: Two hundred and eleven subjects meeting original Rome IBS diagnostic criteria were studied: 65 also met Rome II criteria while 146 did not. Subjects were extracted from an epidemiological survey, using home-based personal interviews, on 2000 subjects randomly selected as representative of the Spanish population. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were compared. RESULTS: Of the subjects meeting original Rome but not Rome II criteria, the present diagnosis should be: 40%"minor" IBS (IBS symptoms of less than 12 wk duration), 37% functional constipation, 12% alternating bowel habit, 7% functional diarrhea, 3% functional abdominal bloating, and 1% unspecified functional bowel disorder (FBD). Thus, 52 subjects (36%) should not be diagnosed with IBS because they really had other FBD, 59 (40%) because of symptoms consistent with IBD diagnosis but not the required duration or frequency, and 35 (24%) because of symptoms consistent with some other FBD diagnosis but not meeting the required duration. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and HRQOL were more severely affected in IBS than in other FBD as a group, and in "major" rather than in "minor" forms. CONCLUSIONS: Many subjects meeting original Rome criteria for IBS do not meet Rome II criteria: approximately one quarter of subjects do not have sufficient symptom duration or frequency to be diagnosed with IBS and almost half are now considered as having other ("major" or "minor") FBD.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Health-related quality of life in HIV patients switching to twice-daily indinavir/ritonavir regimen or continuing with three-times-daily indinavir-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes in patients treated with indinavir three-times daily after switching to a twice-daily indinavir/ritonavir regimen or continuing with the same regimen. METHODS: Patients on HAART including indinavir three-times-daily with undetectable viral load were randomly assigned to continue with this therapy or to change to a twice-daily indinavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) regimen. The Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) questionnaire was used as the HRQoL measure. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients participated in the study, of which 59 (50%) were randomly assigned to continue with the three-times-daily regimen. Patients had a mean age of 39 years and 80% of them were male. At baseline, subjects included in the three-times-daily group presented a significantly greater number of symptoms than subjects in the twice-daily group, but no statistically significant differences were observed in MOS-HIV scores between the groups. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, a reduction in HRQoL scores was observed in both groups, which was greater in the twice-daily group. In the per protocol analysis, reduction of HRQoL was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: A HRQoL deterioration, greater in the twice-daily group, was observed in this study in the ITT analysis, while HRQoL remained stable in both groups in patients who continued with and tolerated the allocated regimen.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Irritable bowel syndrome subtypes according to bowel habit: revisiting the alternating subtype.

BACKGROUND: Disturbed bowel habit, diarrhoea or constipation is a key manifestation of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In some patients, diarrhoea and constipation alternate, giving rise to the so-called alternating subtype. AIMS: To assess IBS subtype breakdown (constipation (C-IBS), diarrhoea (D-IBS) or alternating (A-IBS)) according to the Rome II criteria and patients' self-assessment, the predominance in the alternating subtype (i.e. constipation, diarrhoea or neither), and the medical and personal impact, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), of the different IBS subtypes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two thousand individuals selected randomly to represent the general population were classified as potential IBS subjects (n = 281) or as non-potential IBS subjects (n = 1719) according to a validated questionnaire. Bowel habit classification was determined using the Rome II IBS supportive symptoms. RESULTS: Among 201 subjects meeting the Rome I criteria, 15% presented with D-IBS, 44% presented with C-IBS, 19% presented with A-IBS, and 22% presented with normal bowel habit. Among the 63 subjects meeting the Rome II criteria, 23% presented with A-IBS. According to the subjects' self-assessment, of those meeting the Rome I criteria, 16% considered themselves to have D-IBS, 66% to have C-IBS and 18% to have A-IBS. In subjects meeting the Rome II criteria, 24% considered themselves to have A-IBS. Among those classified with A-IBS by the Rome II criteria, most considered themselves to be constipated. Regardless of the subtype self-classification, most subjects reported a normal frequency of bowel movements. Clinical manifestations in A-IBS were very similar to those of C-IBS but with the added presence of defecatory urgency. Abdominal discomfort/pain and frequency of visits to physicians were greater in the A-IBS subtype than in the other two IBS subtypes. HRQoL was affected similarly in all IBS subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-quarter of subjects with IBS belong to the A-IBS subtype by the Rome II criteria, although the majority consider themselves to be constipated; indeed, clinical manifestations are more akin to the C-IBS subtype than to the D-IBS subtype. Abdominal discomfort/pain and frequency of visits to physicians are greater in the A-IBS subtype than in the other two IBS subtypes, while HRQoL is impaired similarly.

Adolescent↗