Mohamed A Moussa | Search PubMed

PubMed2005

Dental patient awareness of smoking effects on oral health: Comparison of smokers and non-smokers.

OBJECTIVES: The negative effects of cigarette smoking on oral health are well established, yet few studies assessed patient awareness of such effects. The aim of this study was to examine differences in dental patient knowledge and awareness of the effects of smoking on oral health between smokers and non-smokers. METHODS: Adult patients from 12 dental centers in Kuwait were asked to complete a 14-point self-administered structured questionnaire on the effects of smoking on oral health in this cross-sectional survey. Significant associations between oral health knowledge, smoking status, and sociodemographic variables were examined with univariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1012 subjects participated (response rate = 84.3%). The prevalence of smoking was 29.3%. Fewer smokers than non-smokers thought that oral health and smoking are related (92.2% vs. 95.8%; P = 0.020), and that smoking affected oral cancer (52.4% vs. 66.8%; P < 0.001), periodontal health (72% vs. 78%; P = 0.040), or tooth staining (86.1% vs. 90.9%; P = 0.018). Logistic regression analysis showed smokers to be significantly less aware of the oral health effects of smoking than non-smoking patients (OR=1.51; 95% CI: 1.05-2.16; P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Smoking dental patients are significantly less aware of the oral health effects of smoking than non-smokers. Comparative studies in other populations may be warranted to ascertain the validity of these results.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The moving dynamic random dot stereosize test: validity and repeatability.

PURPOSE: We have developed a new test suitable for measuring stereopsis in young children and individuals with communication difficulties. It consists of a drifting, computer-generated red and green, dynamic random dot, disparate shape. The motion direction is indicated by the subject (subjective response) or by a naive observer judging the eye movements of the subject (objective response). Disparity is maintained at 616 sec arc and the dependent variable is the angular subtense of the target, which varies from 11 degrees to 11 ft. In this study, precision (ie, measuring repeatability and objective-subjective agreement) and validity were assessed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixteen subjects with normal vision participated in the repeatability study and 10 in the validity studies. A two-up/one-down, 2 alternative forced choice staircase procedure was used to measure objective and subjective threshold on two occasions with a 1-week separation. Sensitivity for detecting anisometropia was estimated with simulated anisometropia (0 to 3 D) and by comparison with the Randot test. Sensitivity for detecting amblyopia or strabismus was tested in 10 subjects. RESULTS: Subjective repeatability was 0.31 log units (2 levels of the test) and objective repeatability was 0.49 log units (3.2 levels of the test). The test was able to detect 2.0 D of simulated anisometropia in 8 of 10 cases (above the 95% confidence interval). None of the amblyopic subjects demonstrated stereopsis. CONCLUSION: This test of dynamic global stereopsis has potential as a clinical or screening tool for anisometropia, amblyopia, and strabismus.

Adult↗