Hepatitis C with normal liver enzymes: to treat or not to treat. A balancing view: a decision to be shared with patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Mitchell L Shiffman.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Despite improvements in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, nearly half of all patients do not respond to initial therapy. Retreatment of these patients with pegylated interferon and ribavirin has been successful in only a limited percentage of cases. Factors associated with sustained virologic response (SVR) following retreatment include prior treatment with interferon monotherapy, HCV genotype 2 or 3, a low serum HCV RNA level, and the absence of cirrhosis. Fewer than 6% of nonresponders who were previously treated with interferon and ribavirin and who have cirrhosis, genotype 1, and a high viral load achieve SVR following retreatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. No therapy has been shown to yield SVR in patients who do not respond to pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Long-term maintenance therapy with pegylated interferon is currently being evaluated in nonresponders with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. Its use should be considered investigational at this time.
The treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection has improved dramatically over the past several years. Despite this, more than half of all patients with genotype 1 fail to achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) following therapy. The decision to retreat a nonresponder should balance two major factors: the likelihood that the patient will achieve an SVR during retreatment and the likelihood that the patient will develop progressive fibrosis and cirrhosis within the next 5 to 10 years (before more effective therapy is developed). Recent data have demonstrated that about 18% of all patients with previous nonresponse to standard interferon therapy (with or without ribavirin) will achieve an SVR when retreated with peginterferon and ribavirin. However, no therapy has been shown to be effective for patients with nonresponse to peginterferon and ribavirin. The approach to such patients is based on correcting the factors that led to this nonresponse. Maintenance peginterferon therapy is currently being explored but is likely to be of benefit in only a select group of nonresponders. The management of patients who have failed to achieve SVR is, therefore, one of the most complicated issues in the spectrum of treating chronic hepatitis C. This article reviews the factors to consider when assessing nonresponders for additional therapy and options for patients with continued nonresponse.
BACKGROUND: In preclinical and phase 2 studies, adefovir dipivoxil demonstrated potent activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV), including lamivudine-resistant strains. METHODS: We randomly assigned 515 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to receive 10 mg of adefovir dipivoxil (172 patients), 30 mg of adefovir dipivoxil (173), or placebo (170) daily for 48 weeks. The primary end point was histologic improvement in the 10-mg group as compared with the placebo group. RESULTS: After 48 weeks of treatment, significantly more patients who received 10 mg or 30 mg of adefovir dipivoxil per day than who received placebo had histologic improvement (53 percent [P<0.001], 59 percent [P<0.001], and 25 percent, respectively), a reduction in serum HBV DNA levels (by a median of 3.52 [P<0.001], 4.76 [P<0.001], and 0.55 log copies per milliliter, respectively), undetectable levels (fewer than 400 copies per milliliter) of serum HBV DNA (21 percent [P<0.001], 39 percent [P<0.001], and 0 percent, respectively), normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (48 percent [P<0.001], 55 percent [P<0.001], and 16 percent, respectively), and HBeAg seroconversion (12 percent [P=0.049], 14 percent [P=0.01], and 6 percent, respectively). No adefovir-associated resistance mutations were identified in the HBV DNA polymerase gene. The safety profile of the 10-mg dose of adefovir dipivoxil was similar to that of placebo; however, there was a higher frequency of adverse events and renal laboratory abnormalities in the group given 30 mg of adefovir dipivoxil per day. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, 48 weeks of 10 mg or 30 mg of adefovir dipivoxil per day resulted in histologic liver improvement, reduced serum HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase levels, and increased the rates of HBeAg seroconversion. The 10-mg dose has a favorable risk-benefit profile for long-term treatment. No adefovir-associated resistance mutations were identified in the HBV DNA polymerase gene.
BACKGROUND: The transplantation of the right lobe of a liver from a living adult donor into an adult recipient has been performed increasingly frequently in the United States. Although the use of grafts from living donors is standard practice in transplantation in children, their use in adults remains controversial. METHODS: To study the use of liver transplantation from a living donor, we sent a 24-item questionnaire to all liver-transplantation programs in the United States. Data on indications, evaluation, and outcomes were analyzed with the use of univariate and multivariate methods. Data on recent transplantations were gathered from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and directly from the transplantation programs. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 84 of the 122 programs (69 percent) describing the results of 449 adult-to-adult transplantations of partial livers from living donors that were performed in 42 centers. Fourteen centers had performed more than 10 such transplantations each and together accounted for 80 percent of such transplantations. Centers that performed such transplantations also performed more transplantations of livers from cadaveric donors and more transplantations from living donors in children than centers that did not perform the adult-to-adult procedure (P=0.002 and P=0.001, respectively). A total of 45 percent of potential donors who were evaluated eventually donated a lobe of their liver; 99 percent of these donors were genetically or emotionally related to the recipient. Complications in the donor were more frequent in the centers performing the fewest transplantations from living donors in adults and included biliary complications requiring intervention (in 6.0 percent), reoperation (in 4.5 percent), and death (in one donor [0.2 percent]). Among the recipients, 1.6 percent did not meet criteria for receipt of a cadaveric transplant; cancer, retransplantation, and acute liver failure were uncommon indications for transplantation from a living donor. Biliary complications occurred in 22.0 percent of recipients, and vascular complications occurred in 9.8 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Adult-to-adult liver transplantation from a living donor is increasingly performed in the United States but is concentrated in a few large-volume centers. Mortality among donors is low, but complications in the donor are relatively common.
The biochemical, virologic, and histologic spectrum of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 66 consecutive patients with HIV-HCV coinfection and 119 HCV controls was compared: 86% of coinfected patients had CD4 counts >200 cells/mm3, 51% had a normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value, the mean HCV RNA titer was 5.7 log IU/mL, 92% of coinfected patients were of genotype 1, and the mean histologic activity index was 6.86 with advanced fibrosis in 32% of patients. The biochemical, virologic, and histologic findings of HCV in coinfected patients were similar to those observed in HCV controls. For both groups of patients, no clinical, biochemical, or virologic factors could reliably identify patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, underscoring the importance of liver biopsy in the evaluation of these patients. The spectrum of liver disease in coinfection includes a significant proportion of patients with normal ALT values, and excluding these patients from previous studies has led to an overestimation of HCV disease severity.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The current standard for the determination of sustained virologic response in patients treated for hepatitis C is undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA 24 weeks following the completion of therapy. Sensitive molecular tests may permit earlier determination of sustained virologic response following the completion of therapy in end-of-treatment responders. METHODS: We examined this possibility in 1441 patients, who received 48 weeks of treatment with either standard or pegylated interferon alpha-2a. HCV RNA was determined by polymerase chain reaction assay (Amplicor HCV Monitor vs. 2.0) at baseline and monitored at 4-week intervals throughout the treatment and 24-week post-treatment follow-up periods. RESULTS: End-of-treatment and sustained response were achieved in 624 and 342 patients, respectively. For all treatments, relapse was most frequent at weeks 52 and 56 and became rare following week 60. Only six patients out of 348 patients (2%) became HCV RNA positive between weeks 60 and 72. Analysis of baseline characteristics failed to identify a specific set of parameters associated with early relapse. CONCLUSIONS: This finding suggests that determination of HCV RNA levels at 12 weeks of follow-up may be sufficient for making decisions related to the management of most patients treated with standard or pegylated interferon alpha.
To determine if an intensive regimen of daily, high-dose interferon would improve the initial response rates to therapy for hepatitis C genotype 1 among African American and Caucasian patients, we conducted a retrospective analysis of a treatment trial conducted between October 1995 and June 1997. Patients were randomized to 24 weeks of therapy with interferon--alpha-2b at either 5 MU daily or 3 MU three times a week. On the standard interferon regimen (3 MU three times a week) African Americans and Caucasians had similar initial response rates. However, unlike Caucasians, African Americans did not have an increased initial virological response when treated with an intensive, daily dose regimen. Levels of HCV RNA decreased more slowly during the first 12 weeks of therapy among African Americans. Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard estimates for the different race and dose combinations revealed that Caucasians who received daily interferon were most likely to have an initial response (logrank, P < 0.001).
A retrospective study was performed to (1) characterize the clinical and histologic features of those with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values, (2) compare the spectrum of NAFLD associated with normal versus elevated ALT levels, and (3) determine whether there were differences in the clinical or histologic spectrum of NAFLD between those with a low normal versus high normal ALT value. A total of 51 subjects with NAFLD and normal ALT were identified and compared with 50 consecutive subjects with NAFLD and elevated ALT. The major indications for liver biopsy in those with normal ALT were unexplained hepatomegaly (n = 21) and evaluation as a potential donor for living donor liver transplantation (n = 16). The 2 groups were comparable with respect to age, gender distribution, and ethnicity. Approximately 80% of cases in both groups had at least 1 feature of the metabolic syndrome, the major risk factor for NAFLD. The 2 groups were also comparable with respect to the grade of the individual histologic parameters of NAFLD. A total of 12 subjects with normal ALT levels had bridging fibrosis, whereas 6 had cirrhosis. Diabetes was the only factor independently associated with an increased risk of advanced fibrosis (bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis) by multivariate analysis (relative risk: 2.3, P <.01). The mean steatosis (1.6 vs. 2.16, P <.04) and perisinusoidal fibrosis scores (0.35 vs. 0.9, P <.049) were lower in those with low normal (<30 IU/L) ALT versus high normal ALT. However, the prevalence of advanced fibrosis was similar (5 of 15 vs. 13 of 36, respectively). In conclusion, (1) the entire histologic spectrum of NAFLD can be seen in individuals with normal ALT values, (2) the histologic spectrum in these individuals is not significantly different from those with elevated ALT levels, and (3) a low normal ALT value does not guarantee freedom from underlying steatohepatitis with advanced fibrosis.
1. Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of cirrhosis and the most common indication for liver transplantation in many countries throughout the world. 2. The most significant factors leading to fibrosis progression in patients with chronic HCV infection include the degree of inflammation present on liver biopsy and ongoing alcohol use. 3. Patients with cirrhosis secondary to chronic HCV infection are at increased risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). 4. Achieving a sustained virological response after treatment with interferon, with or without ribavirin, is associated with a reduced risk for the development of cirrhosis and HCC and prolonged survival.
Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation is universal. A significant percentage of these patients develop progressive graft injury and cirrhosis. Those factors that modulate disease progression in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection remain controversial and are poorly understood. Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation with either interferon or interferon and ribavirin has yielded only limited success. Regardless of this, treatment is instituted. Peginterferon is more effective than standard interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the nontransplantation setting when used either alone or with ribavirin. The effectiveness of peginterferon, both with and without ribavirin in the posttransplantation setting, is currently being explored. In this review those factors thought to affect disease progression in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus will be discussed, strategies that have been used to treat recurrent hepatitis C virus will be reviewed, and the impact that peginterferon may have on hepatitis C virus infection in the pretransplantation and posttransplantation setting will be explored.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: The present study was performed to evaluate the impact of the international unit standard for measuring HCV RNA in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS: The three assays used were Amplicor Monitor PCR, the National Genetics Institute PCR assay, and branched chain DNA. HCV RNA was measured at four time points (baseline, 3 months after the start of therapy, at the end of treatment, and 6 months after discontinuation of therapy) in 106 consecutive patients who received interferon and ribavirin for chronic HCV. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 44 yr. Of the patients, 62% were male, 24% were African American, 38% had bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis, and 75% were HCV genotype 1. Of the 424 samples analyzed, 82-89% of values were within 1 log unit and 85-92% were within 2 log units by the various assays. This variability was not dependent upon HCV genotype. HCV RNA was undetectable in 1.4-6.8% of samples when virus was detected by another assay. The mean HCV RNA in these discordant samples was 1.47-6.33 log IU/ml (30-2,100,000 IU/ml). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that approximately 90% of serum values for HCV RNA were within 1 log unit by the international unit standard regardless of which virological assay was used. However, false positive and false negative results as well as variations in the HCV RNA level of more than 1 to 2 log units can occur with any of the assays, and these results may have an impact upon the management of patients receiving interferon therapy. It is therefore unwise in clinical practice to base important treatment decisions upon a single HCV RNA determination.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the following: 1) whether chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was specifically associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); 2) the factors associated with NAFLD in patients with HCV; and 3) the clinical and histological spectrum of NAFLD occurring together with HCV. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 3826 biopsies was performed to compare the prevalence of NAFLD in those with HCV versus that in other liver diseases, e.g., hepatitis B, primary biliary cirrhosis, and alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency. Patients with HCV and NAFLD were also compared with an age- and gender-matched control group with HCV and <5% hepatic steatosis. RESULTS: The prevalence of NAFLD in patients with HCV was similar to that in hepatitis B, primary biliary cirrhosis, or alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency. The risk of having NAFLD in patients with HCV correlated with body weight (r = 0.7, p < 0.02). Compared with a control group with HCV alone (n = 75), patients with HCV and NAFLD (n = 69) were likely to be heavier (mean BMI 27 vs 30, p < 0.003), diabetic (eight vs 21, p < 0.005), hypertensive (14 vs 25, p < 0.05), and hypertriglyceridemic (15 vs 33, p < 0.05). The HCV viral load, genotype distribution, liver enzymes, liver functions, and ferritin levels were comparable across the study groups. Those with HCV and NAFLD were more likely to have advanced fibrosis (bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis) (26% vs 53%, p < 0.03). Weight, diabetes, and cytological ballooning were independent predictors of advanced fibrosis in those with HCV and NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of NAFLD in patients with HCV is strongly associated with features of the metabolic syndrome and is a risk factor for advanced fibrosis. Advanced fibrosis in such patients is related to weight, presence of diabetes, and presence and degree of cytological ballooning.
BACKGROUND: Treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a alone produces significantly higher sustained virologic responses than treatment with interferon alfa-2a alone in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We compared the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin, and peginterferon alfa-2a alone in the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: A total of 1121 patients were randomly assigned to treatment and received at least one dose of study medication, consisting of 180 microg of peginterferon alfa-2a once weekly plus daily ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg, depending on body weight), weekly peginterferon alfa-2a plus daily placebo, or 3 million units of interferon alfa-2b thrice weekly plus daily ribavirin for 48 weeks. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of patients who received peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin had a sustained virologic response (defined as the absence of detectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after cessation of therapy) than of patients who received interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin (56 percent vs. 44 percent, P<0.001) or peginterferon alfa-2a alone (56 percent vs. 29 percent, P<0.001). The proportions of patients with HCV genotype 1 who had sustained virologic responses were 46 percent, 36 percent, and 21 percent, respectively, for the three regimens. Among patients with HCV genotype 1 and high base-line levels of HCV RNA, the proportions of those with sustained virologic responses were 41 percent, 33 percent, and 13 percent, respectively. The overall safety profiles of the three treatment regimens were similar; the incidence of influenza-like symptoms and depression was lower in the groups receiving peginterferon alfa-2a than in the group receiving interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic hepatitis C, once-weekly peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin was tolerated as well as interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin and produced significant improvements in the rate of sustained virologic response, as compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin or peginterferon alfa-2a alone.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-induced chronic nephrotoxicity in liver transplant patients is reversible by replacement of the CNI with rapamycin as the primary immunosuppressive agent. CNIs, while providing potent immunosuppression for liver transplant patients, exhibit nephrotoxicity as a major side-effect. Whereas acute CNI-induced nephrotoxicity is reversible by withdrawal of the CNI, chronic nephrotoxicity due to CNIs is a progressive process thought to be irreversible. Eight liver transplant patients with CNI-induced chronic nephrotoxicity were converted to rapamycin as the primary immunosuppressive agent. The CNI was either discontinued (four patients) or the dosage lowered to maintain a subtherapeutic level (four patients). Renal function as assessed by serum creatinine was measured before and after conversion to rapamycin. Two patients progressed to dialysis dependence following conversion to rapamycin. These two patients had been on CNIs for a mean of 112 months (range 93-131 months) prior to conversion to rapamycin. Five patients experienced improvement in renal function. These patients had been on calcineurin inhibitors for a mean of 60 months (range 42-75 months) prior to conversion. One patient with chronic nephrolithiasis as a contributing factor to his renal dysfunction has progressed to dialysis dependence despite conversion to rapamycin following exposure to a CNI for 24 months. In the five patients with improved renal function, serum creatinine levels decreased significantly (2.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dL to 1.5 +/- 0.1 mg/dL, p < 0.05) by a mean of 7.2 months (range 5-10 months) after conversion from CNI to rapamycin-based immunosuppression. Liver function remained stable after conversion to rapamycin. CNI-induced chronic nephrotoxicity can be reversed upon withdrawal of the CNI. Rapamycin is an effective replacement agent as primary immunosuppressive therapy following withdrawal of CNIs in liver transplant patients with CNI-induced chronic nephrotoxicity.
Significant advances have been made in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection during the past 5 years. As a consequence, there is continuing enthusiasm for retreating patients who did not achieve sustained virological response (SVR) with previous therapy. Retreatment of non-responders to standard interferon monotherapy using interferon and ribavirin has yielded SVR rates of 12% to 15%. Retreatment with peginterferon and ribavirin has been more effective; achieving SVR rates of 34% to 40%. Retreatment of patients who relapsed after interferon monotherapy using standard interferon and ribavirin yielded SVR rates of 47%, whereas retreatment with peginterferon and ribavirin resulted in an SVR rate of about 60%. The major factors associated with a higher likelihood of an SVR after retreatment include previous relapse, previous treatment with interferon monotherapy, HCV genotypes 2 or 3, lower serum levels of HCV RNA, and having a significant decrease in HCV RNA levels during the initial course of therapy. These results help to focus retreatment with peginterferon and ribavirin on subsets of patients who are most likely to benefit.
Living donor liver transplantation for adults was developed only recently in an attempt to increase the pool of donor organs; to reduce morbidity and mortality; and to improve the long-term survival of patients in need of liver transplant. Within a few brief years, this procedure has gained widespread support by both the public and transplant community. The procedure will soon be performed by nearly 80% of all liver transplant programs in the United States. Unfortunately, the long-term risks of the procedure to the recipient and especially the donor remain undefined. In response to the rapid growth and enthusiasm for this procedure, the National Institutes of Health sponsored a workshop, the goals of which were to review the scientific, medical, and nonmedical issues associated with living donor liver transplantation, and to define questions for future basic and clinical investigations which could improve the success and applicability of this procedure.