Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michelle G Craske

Publications and source records attributed to Michelle G Craske.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Quality of care for primary care patients with anxiety disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated quality of care for primary care patients with anxiety disorders in university-affiliated outpatient clinics in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Seattle. METHOD: Three hundred sixty-six primary care outpatients who were diagnosed with panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (with or without major depression) were surveyed about care received in the prior 3 months. Quality indicators were mental health referral, anxiety counseling, and use of appropriate antianxiety medication during the previous 3 months. RESULTS: Approximately one-third of patients with anxiety disorders had received counseling from their primary care provider in the prior 3 months. Fewer than 10% had receiving counseling from a mental health professional that included multiple elements of cognitive behavior therapy. Approximately 40% had received appropriate antianxiety medications in the previous 3 months, although only 25% had received them at a minimally adequate dose and duration. Overall, fewer than one in three patients had received either psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy that met a criterion for quality care. In multivariate analyses, patients with comorbid depression and/or medical illness were more likely-and patients from ethnic minorities were less likely-to receive appropriate antianxiety medications. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of quality care for anxiety disorders are moderate to low in university-affiliated primary care practices. Although an appropriate type of pharmacotherapy was frequently used, it was often of inadequate duration. Cognitive behavior therapy was markedly underused. These findings emphasize the need for practice guidelines and implementation of quality improvement programs for anxiety disorders in primary care.

Ambulatory Care↗

Factor structure of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: examination of a method factor.

The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) was originally designed as a unifactorial measure of pathological trait worry. However, recent studies supported a two-factor solution with positively worded items loading on the first factor and reverse-scored items loading on a second factor. The current study compared this two-factor model to a negative wording method factor solution among college students. A method factor model with all PSWQ items loading on a single worry factor and reverse-scored items loading on a negative wording method factor provided as good a fit as the two-factor model. This method factor alone did not predict a generalized anxiety disorder diagnosis. Finally, the psychometric properties of an abbreviated scale containing only positively worded items were examined. The PSWQ appears to measure a single unitary construct, but response patterns differ between positively worded and reverse-scored items. Theoretical implications for pathological worry and assessment-related issues are discussed.

Adolescent↗

Fear of loss of vigilance: development and preliminary validation of a self-report instrument.

We describe the development and initial validation of the Fear of Loss of Vigilance Questionnaire (FLOVQ). Recent investigations indicate that individuals with nocturnal panic (NP) demonstrate increased anxiety and panic in response to meditative relaxation and imagined hypnosis, compared to those with daytime panic (DP) only, suggesting that NP individuals fear situations that involve a loss of vigilance (e.g., relaxation, fatigue and altered states of consciousness). The FLOVQ was designed to assess this construct and was tested in five non-clinical samples and one clinical sample. The 14-item instrument demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Non-clinical respondents who experienced NP endorsed greater fear of loss of vigilance than non-panickers; those who only experienced DP did not differ from the other groups. By contrast, on measures of trait and state anxiety, and anxiety sensitivity, both panic groups scored higher than non-panickers, suggesting that these latter measures were related to broader factors pertaining to a general tendency to panic versus a specific factor associated with NP. No group differences were found between NPs and DPs in either the non-clinical or the clinical sample, suggesting that fear of loss of vigilance may be a vulnerability factor for the development of NP and that the FLOVQ has more utility as a research rather than as a clinical instrument.

Adolescent↗

Reactivity to imagery and nocturnal panic attacks.

We assessed psychophysiological responses to imagery of traumatic events, panic attacks, and loss of vigilance (i.e., being hypnotized) in participants diagnosed with panic disorder. Participants were either currently experiencing nocturnal panic or daytime panics only. It was hypothesized that nocturnal panickers would exhibit heightened responsivity to imagery of their worst panic and worst trauma, as well as being hypnotized, compared to day panickers. Using established imagery procedures, heart rate, skin conductance, and frontalis electromyogram were recorded as participants imagined each scene. Nocturnal and day panickers differed in their responses to the hypnosis scene only. As predicted, nocturnal panickers endorsed more panic symptoms in response to imagery of being hypnotized. Contrary to expectation, nocturnal and daytime panickers showed no differences in physiologic reactivity or self-reported distress to worst trauma or worst panic imagery. The findings are discussed with respect to the role of fear of loss of vigilance for nocturnal panic.

Adult↗

The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto): problems and remedies for diagnosing panic disorder and social phobia.

In a recent study of treatment for panic disorder in primary care, the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) was used to provide psychiatric diagnoses. However, during and after data collection, it was discovered that the CIDI appeared to place, or fail to place, a substantial number of people into diagnostic categories in ways that conflicted with the investigators' clinical experience. The wording of questions in the panic module, coupled with a lack of structured follow-up probes, resulted in apparent false negatives for panic disorder. Moreover, patients who would otherwise meet criteria for panic disorder or social phobia did not receive a diagnosis based on rules that may be discordant with clinical practice and, at times, the design of the DSM-IV. For this study, changes were made to the interview, including additional probes for the panic disorder module and modification of the decision rules used to assign or rule out diagnoses of panic disorder and social phobia. The changes resulted in greater inclusion of patients in the panic disorder and social phobia diagnostic categories and we argue that these changes to the CIDI-Auto increase the clinical validity of this instrument. We did not examine the false positive rate for the unmodified or modified CIDI, but this is an important issue that needs to be evaluated in future research.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗

Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome among university students: the roles of worry, neuroticism, anxiety sensitivity and visceral anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: Relationships between presence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), chronic worry, neuroticism, anxiety sensitivity and anxiety about visceral sensations were examined among university students. METHODS: College student participants were administered self-report diagnostic measures of IBS and GAD, the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), the Neuroticism subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) and five additional items designed to measure visceral anxiety. RESULTS: The prevalence of IBS and its associated characteristics among students were similar to previous community survey studies, with the exception of lower symptom severity in the university sample. IBS was associated with a higher frequency of GAD and greater worry, neuroticism, anxiety sensitivity and visceral anxiety. Logistic regression analyses further showed that the measure of anxiety specific to visceral sensations was the strongest predictor of IBS diagnostic status. CONCLUSIONS: While various aspects of anxiety appear related to IBS, specific anxiety about visceral sensations appears to be the most significant factor. Implications of the associations between anxiety-related variables, particularly anxiety about visceral sensations, are discussed.

Abdominal Pain↗

Panic control treatment for agoraphobia.

The goal of the present study was to compare the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral treatment for panic control alone versus this treatment containing an additional in vivo exposure component. The sample was comprised of 68 individuals who met diagnosis for panic disorder with agoraphobia. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two 16-week treatment conditions, panic control only and panic control with in vivo exposure. Assessments were repeated at baseline, mid-treatment, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up using diagnostic and behavioral measures. Results indicated that the two treatment conditions were equally efficacious for both panic disorder and agoraphobia. The intervention explicitly targeting agoraphobia appeared superfluous given the efficacy of panic control alone. On the other hand, reduction in panic frequency predicted reduction in agoraphobic avoidance overall. The practical and theoretical implications are discussed, as are limitations and directions for future research.

Adult↗

Treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in older adults.

Older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; N = 75; M age = 67.1 years) were randomly assigned to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), a discussion group (DG) organized around worry-provoking topics, or a waiting period. Participants in both active conditions improved relative to the waiting list. Although CBT participants improved on more measures than DG participants, the authors found only I significant difference immediately after treatment and no differences at 6-month follow-up. Effect sizes were smaller than in younger samples, but CBT showed large effects and DG showed medium-sized effects Overall, results indicate that brief treatment of late-life GAD is beneficial, but they provide only limited support for the superiority of CBT to a credible comparison intervention.

Aged↗

Moving treatment research from clinical trials to the real world.

Recently the National Institutes of Health has been emphasizing research that takes findings generated by clinical research and translates them into treatments for patients who are seen in day-to-day nonresearch settings. This translational process requires a series of steps in which elements of both efficacy and effectiveness research are combined into successively more complex designs. However, there has been little discussion of exactly how to develop and operationalize these designs. This article describes an approach to the development of these hybrid designs. Their operationalization is illustrated by using the design of an ongoing effectiveness treatment study of panic disorder in primary care. Experts in both efficacy and effectiveness research collaborated to address the methodologic and data collection issues that need to be considered in designing a first-generation effectiveness study. Elements of the overall study design, setting or service delivery context, inclusion and exclusion criteria, recruitment and screening, assessment tools, and intervention modification are discussed to illustrate the thinking behind and rationale for decisions about these different design components. Although the series of decisions for this study were partly influenced by considerations specific to the diagnosis of panic disorder and the context of the primary care setting, the general stepwise approach to designing treatment interventions using an effectiveness model is relevant for the development of similar designs for other mental disorders and other settings.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Thought action fusion: can it be corrected?

The goal of this study was to investigate whether or not a brief educational intervention delivered prior to engaging in an anxiety-provoking task (writing a sentence about hoping that a friend/relative was in a car accident) would be effective in offsetting anxiety in college students with a strong propensity to endorse statements of thought action fusion (TAF). As hypothesized, individuals receiving the educational intervention were less anxious than a placebo intervention control group at post task; they were also less likely to endorse statements of TAF after receiving the educational intervention. Also, those who chose to neutralize after writing the sentence (regardless of experimental group) were more likely to report feeling guiltier, more immoral and a greater sense of responsibility about writing the sentence prior to neutralizing than those who did not subsequently neutralize. These results are discussed in relation to the cognitive theory of obsessive-compulsive disorder and implications for prevention programs.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy↗

The relationship of thought-action fusion to pathologicial worry and generalized anxiety disorder.

Meta-cognitive beliefs associated with pathological worry and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) may encompass the likelihood subtype of thought-action fusion (TAF), the belief that one's thoughts can influence outside events. In the current study of 494 undergraduate college students, positive correlations between scores on the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) and the two Likelihood subscales of the TAF Scale were found, and participants endorsing at least some DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for GAD scored significantly higher on both TAF-Likelihood subscales than participants reporting no GAD symptoms. However, these TAF scales did not predict GAD diagnostic status with PSWQ included as a predictor. In contrast to previous research, the TAF-Moral scale did not correlate with worry. Relationships between TAF, pathological worry, and meta-cognition are discussed in relation to GAD.

Adult↗

Presleep attributions about arousal during sleep: nocturnal panic.

This study examined the role of presleep attributions about physiological events during sleep in nocturnal panic attacks. Patients who regularly experienced nocturnal panic were physiologically monitored as audio signals were presented during sleep. They were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: expected, in which signals of intense physiological changes were expected; unexpected, in which signals of intense physiological changes were not expected; or control, involving distinctly different signals unrelated to physiological responses. The unexpected condition led to substantially more self-reported distress and panic attacks. The experimental conditions did not elicit different autonomic reactions, but those who panicked showed stronger physiological responses than those who did not panic. The findings are consistent with a cognitive model of nocturnal panic attacks.

Arousal↗

Does nocturnal panic represent a more severe form of panic disorder?

Nocturnal panic (NP), or waking from sleep in a state of panic, occurs in 18% to 45% of panic disorder patients. This relatively common phenomenon, however, is not well understood. In this study, the authors tested the hypotheses that NP represents a more severe form of panic disorder or is a manifestation of heightened vulnerability to sleep disturbance. Patients with NP ( = 51) were compared with patients with panic disorder without a history of NP ( = 41) on measures of panic disorder severity, comorbidity, interpersonal functioning, and sleep disturbance. There was no evidence for more severe psychopathology and only weak evidence for more sleep disturbance. Instead, patients with NP showed less agoraphobic avoidance, perhaps suggesting that they are less likely to associate panic with situational factors. The authors conclude that NP may be a specific version of panic disorder characterized by fearful associations with sleep and sleeplike states.

Adult↗

Assessment of beliefs about psychotropic medication and psychotherapy: development of a measure for patients with anxiety disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This study presents the psychometric properties of a brief measure to assess beliefs about psychotropic medications and psychotherapy among patients with anxiety disorders. METHOD: Data were collected on a large sample of primary care patients with a range of anxiety disorders, as part of the Collaborative Care for Anxiety and Panic study. Factor analyses using principal axis factoring with Varimax rotations were used to determine the factor structure of the beliefs scale. Internal consistency, concurrent validity and predictive validity of the resulting subscales were examined. RESULTS: Two subscales emerged, one reflecting beliefs about psychotropic medications and the other assessing beliefs about psychotherapy. Both showed strong internal consistency and concurrent validity. The beliefs about psychotropic medication demonstrated strong predictive validity. CONCLUSIONS: This measure may be a useful tool for assessing treatment beliefs among patients with anxiety disorders toward the provision of more quality treatment for this population. Its brevity may make it particularly useful in primary health care settings.

Adult↗

Correlates of alcohol use among anxious and depressed primary care patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the patterns of alcohol use for primary care patients with anxiety disorders and/or major depression in three urban university-affiliated outpatient clinics. METHOD: A waiting room sample of adults was screened for anxiety disorders and major depression. Six hundred fourteen screened patients were assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview [World Health Organization. Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 2.1. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997] and frequency-quantity alcohol use questions. Adjusted for age and gender, logistic regression analyses were used to determine associations between panic disorder, social phobia, PTSD, major depression and typical heavy (three drinks/two or more times a week) and frequent (four or more times a week) alcohol use. RESULTS: Of the patients, 6.19% (38/614) reported typical heavy drinking and 8.31% (51/614) reported frequent drinking in the preceding 3 months. PTSD was associated with heavy drinking (adjusted OR = 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.3). Panic disorder was associated with frequent alcohol use (adjusted OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.2) but reduced heavy drinking (adjusted OR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9). There was no significant relationship between alcohol use and the co-occurrence of two or more anxiety and/or mood disorders. CONCLUSION: In an examination of primary care patients diagnosed, the majority of whom were with at least one anxiety disorder and/or major depression; current heavy and frequent alcohol use was associated with specific individual anxiety disorders and/or major depression.

Adult↗

Using five questions to screen for five common mental disorders in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of the Anxiety and Depression Detector.

OBJECTIVE: Primary care providers are increasingly taking on the role of ad hoc mental health provider. However, before patients in primary care can be treated, they must be identified. This study set out to validate a very brief screening instrument for identifying primary care patients with anxiety and depression. METHOD: Eight hundred one primary care patients completed a questionnaire screening for (1) panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and social phobia, or (2) panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depression. Screening was followed by a diagnostic interview. The properties of the questionnaires were examined to identify a small set of items that effectively and efficiently screened for panic disorder, PTSD, social phobia, GAD and depression. RESULTS: Five items were selected across the two versions of the questionnaire, comprising the Anxiety and Depression Detector (the ADD). The sensitivities for the items ranged from 0.62 to 1.00, and the specificity values ranged from 0.56 to 0.83. When a "yes" answer to any of the screening questions was used to predict the presence of any diagnosis, sensitivity values were 0.92 to 0.96 and specificity values were 0.57 to 0.82. Sensitivity and specificity values varied little by gender, age or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The five items of the ADD appear to comprise a useful screening device for anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care settings.

Adolescent↗

Treating panic disorder in primary care: a collaborative care intervention.

Efficacy research indicates the success of cognitive behavioral treatment and medication treatment for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. However, research findings to date possess limited generalizability beyond specialty mental health settings. We present a model for collaborative care treatment for panic disorder in the primary care setting that combines cognitive behavioral therapy and medications, and involves a behavioral health specialist, psychiatrist, and primary care physician. Educational aids that are aimed to educate and activate patients to participate as partners in their care are provided. We outline the ways in which the standard treatment was modified, in light of the nature of the sample and setting, such as fewer sessions and management of comorbidity. Also, we provide evidence for acceptability of this intervention to primary care physicians and patients. This description is intended to lay the groundwork for continued research efforts in the extension of efficacious treatments into primary care settings.

Cooperative Behavior↗

Predictors of willingness to consider medication and psychosocial treatment for panic disorder in primary care patients.

The purpose of this investigation was to identify demographic and clinical patient characteristics related to willingness to consider panic disorder treatments in the primary care setting. Given the prevalence of anxiety disorders and the increased provision of mental health treatments in general medical settings, patients were selected from primary care settings. An unselected sample of 4,198 patients completed a brief questionnaire containing questions about demographic characteristics, physical health status, and symptoms of panic disorder, social phobia and PTSD. The 1,043 patients indicating a recent panic attack episode answered additional questions about their willingness to consider both medication and psychosocial forms of intervention for panic. Of these panic patients, 64% reported willingness to consider medication and 67% reported willingness to consider a psychosocial intervention for their panic. Logistic regression analyses for these panic patients revealed that willingness to consider medication treatment for panic was associated with older age, lower education, poorer health status and the presence of social phobia and/or PTSD symptoms. In addition, Asian and African American patients were less likely than Caucasian patients to indicate willingness to consider medication treatment for their panic. However, only the presence of comorbid social phobia and PTSD symptoms predicted willingness to consider a psychosocial intervention. Results suggest that acceptability of psychosocial treatment is unrelated to demographic and physical health factors, while primary care patients with certain demographic characteristics, good physical health, or who suffer from fewer comorbid mental health conditions may need additional encouragement to begin medication treatment for panic.

Adult↗