Biomedical subjects

Michela Marcenaro

Publications and source records attributed to Michela Marcenaro.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Does treatment of the pelvic nodes with IMRT increase late rectal toxicity over conformal prostate-only radiotherapy to 76 Gy?

PURPOSE: To compare late rectal toxicity rates after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to the prostate alone (P-3D-CRT) and whole-pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy along with a prostate boost (WP-IMRT/PB) to the same nominal total dose to the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 68 patients treated with conformal radiotherapy to the prostate only to 76 Gy at the National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy, represented the first group (P-3D-CRT). The second group consisted of 45 patients treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA, with IMRT covering the pelvic nodes and seminal vesicles to 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction and the prostate to 60 Gy in the same 30 fractions. A separate phase boosted the prostate to 76 Gy (WP-IMRT/PB). Major aspects of planning were remarkably similar at both institutions leaving the inclusion or not of pelvic nodes as the main treatment-related difference between the two groups. Late rectal toxicity was prospectively scored according to the RTOG scale. All patients have a 12-month minimum follow-up, and mean follow-up, similar in both groups, is 25.9 months (SD [standard deviation]: 8.4 months). RESULTS: At 2 years, the estimated cumulative incidence of grade 2 late rectal toxicity is 6%+/-4% for WP-IMRT/PB and 21.2%+/-6% for P-3D-CRT (p=0.06). The difference became significant (HR [hazard ratio]=0.1, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.0-0.6; p=0.01) at multivariate analysis. None of the patients developed grade 3+ toxicity. CONCLUSION: Despite the larger treated volume, WP-IMRT/PB allows more rectal sparing than P-3D-CRT.

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMed2004

Rectal and bladder motion during conformal radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the extent and the impact of rectum and bladder motion during adjuvant conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients previously operated with RP and treated with early adjuvant 3DCRT were considered for this investigation. Weekly CT scans were collected during treatment (CT1-CTn, n=4-6) and were 3D matched using bony anatomy with the planning CT (CT0). A single observer drew the contours of rectum and bladder on all CTs. The CTV (prostate+/-seminal vesicles surgical bed) was contoured on CT0 by a single observer and a 4-field 3DCRT technique was planned: dose statistics/dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the rectum and bladder were calculated for each contour referred to CT0, CT1...CTn. Average DVHs during the treatment were then calculated and compared with the planned DVH. Cranial, caudal, anterior and posterior shifts of rectum and bladder were also assessed by lateral BEV projections. NTCP values for the rectum were also calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher model. RESULTS: Random variations of volume and DVHs due to variable filling content were found for the bladder; a trend of the bladder to be more empty during therapy with respect to CT0 was also found (median values: 45 cm3 vs. 79 cm3, P=0.02). Regarding the rectum, 6/9 patients showed an average DVH 'worse' than the planned one (up to 10-20%). BEV and volume analyses showed that the rectal volume decreased in 3/9 patients after the first week. In 6/9 patients a systematic anterior shift of the cranial half of the rectum was detected and found to be correlated with a corresponding shift of the posterior border of CTV contoured by five different observers. The average rectal NTCP during therapy was systematically higher than the NTCP referred to CT0 (average increase 1.2%; range 0.0-3.7%, for a 70 Gy ICRU dose, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of systematic uncertainty due to rectal wall motion seems to be relatively high for patients treated with adjuvant 3DCRT after RP. The detected trend of the rectum in migrating anteriorly during therapy is consistent with post-surgery settlement effects and/or some modification of rectum mobility due to irradiation. Rectal motion (and consequent shifts of CTV) was large at the half cranial portion of the rectum while it was very small below the flexure.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Anatomic variations due to radical prostatectomy. Impact on target volume definition and dose-volume parameters of rectum and bladder.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A quantitative estimate of the impact of prostatectomy on pelvic anatomy is unavailable, even if it would be an important prerequisite for a precise definition of clinical target volume (CTV) in post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of prostatectomy on the definition of CTV, on the position of bladder and rectum and their implications for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-D CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients eligible for radical retropubic prostatectomy were considered. Each patient underwent a planning CT between 1 week and 1 month before surgery (CTpre), and then CT was repeated in the same positioning 1-2 months after surgery (CTpost). For each patient the CT(pre/post) scans were matched; rectum, bladder and CTV were contoured on both CT scans for each patient by one observer. Two different CTVs were contoured: CTV1: prostate + seminal vesicles in CTpre; prostate + seminal vesicles surgical bed in CTpost; CTV2: prostate in CTpre; prostate surgical bed in CT(post). After image registration, the contours of rectum, bladder and CTV1/2 drawn on CTpost were transferred on CTpre. The corresponding planning target volumes (PTVs) were generated, and for each PTV, a conformal four field technique using 18-MV X-rays was planned. The volumes of CTV1, CTV2, PTV1, PTV2, rectum and bladder pre- and post-surgery were compared. Differences in 3-D position of these structures before and after surgery were analyzed by beam's eye view (BEV) images. Pre- and post-surgery dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of rectum and bladder were compared together with the fraction of rectum/bladder receiving at least 95% of the ICRU dose (V95), the treated volume (TV, body included in the 95% isodose) and the irradiated volume (IV, body included in the 50% isodose). RESULTS: For both CTV1 and CTV2, the volumes were significantly reduced after prostatectomy (average reduction around 30 cm3 for both; range 0-60 cm3). This reduction was mainly due to a more caudal definition of the cranial edge of CTV after prostatectomy (average difference for CTV2: 1.5 cm; range 0-2.5 cm). Concerning the bladder, a systematic posterior shift of the bladder base (average: 1.5 cm) was found and was correlated with a significant reduction of V95 for bladder (around 10 cm3; p = 0.03). V95 of the rectum, TV and IV also resulted to be significantly lower after surgery. The average reduction of V95 for the rectum was relatively small (2.5 cm3 of rectal wall). CONCLUSION: The impact of prostatectomy on CTV definition is high. A significant reduction of CTV, PTV, TV and IV may be expected after surgery with a consequent reduction of the portions of rectum/bladder irradiated with adjuvant radiotherapy.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Audit of effectiveness of routine follow-up clinics after radiotherapy for cancer: a report of the REACT working group of ESTRO.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology was funded by the EU for a project on recording providing education, and ameliorating the consequences of treatment (REACT). An European audit was carried out as part of which to assess the usefulness of current follow-up practices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 4-month period in 15 cancer centres in 10 countries, patients attending for routine follow-up completed a questionnaire covering their expectations of and satisfaction with the visit. This was matched with a questionnaire completed by the physician about the content and usefulness of the consultation. The feasibility of a short toxicity scale developed by Dische and Saunders was also investigated. RESULTS: In total, 2303 matched questionnaires were analysed. Forty percent of the patients had symptoms or medical problems related to their disease. In 18% there was a positive finding on clinical examination. In 28% investigations were undertaken part of departmental routine practice. Ten percent of the investigations showed an abnormal result. Ninety nine percent of physicians and 85% of the patients expressed satisfaction. Using the short toxicity scale rates of recording toxicity could be increased from 28 to 93%. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in follow-up practices among European centres. There was a low incidence of positive findings clinically or with routine investigations. A simple scale for recording morbidity has proved easy to use by departments, which have not routinely used one of the standard measures. Further work will attempt to produce an European guideline for effective routine follow-up after radiotherapy.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗

PubMed2004

Is there a "curative" role of radiotherapy for clinically localized hormone refractory prostate cancer?

Whether definitive radiotherapy (RT) is still an option for patients with clinically prostate-confined prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation (AD) alone who develop a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not clear. In this retrospective series, we report the outcome of 29 such patients treated with "curative" radiotherapy at our institution between 1991 and 2000. At initial diagnosis, all patients had evidence of prostate-confined disease and for several reasons underwent AD alone. Afterward all patients developed rising PSA, but again, without clinical evidence of distant/pelvic node disease. All underwent RT with curative intent up to 70 Gy (66 to 76 Gy). Median follow-up after radiotherapy is 33.1 month (range: 7-134.2 months). For living patients, minimum and median follow-ups are 30.4 and 55.4 months, respectively. Twenty-three patients (79%) developed overt clinical disease, most of which (19/23, 83%) involved distant sites, whereas isolated locoregional failure was observed in only 4 patients (4/23, 17%). The estimates of locoregional control rate (LRC), actuarial incidence of distant metastases, and overall survival at 5 years are 89 +/- 7%, 68 +/- 9%, and 28 +/- 9%, respectively. Although we were unable to find any predictor of LRC at univariate analysis, patients with low Gleason score at diagnosis, lower PSA at RT, lower risk category and advanced age were less likely to develop distant disease. RT has a palliative role, because most patients with still presumed localized hormone refractory prostate cancer will develop distant metastases. A subset of patients, those with more differentiated tumor at diagnosis and with pre-RT PSA less than 20 ng/mL, might be considered for a more aggressive locoregional approach.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Sucralfate versus mesalazine versus hydrocortisone in the prevention of acute radiation proctitis during conformal radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma. A randomized study.

PURPOSE: To assess whether the topical use of steroids or 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is superior to sucralfate in preventing acute rectal toxicity during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to 76 Gy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing 3DCRT for prostate carcinoma at our institution were offered to be randomized to sucralfate 3 g in 15 ml suspension enema (Antepsin, mesalazine 4 g gel enema (Enterasyn, or hydrocortisone 100 mg foam enema (Colifoam. Randomization was blind to the treating physician but not to the patient. Sucralfate was chosen as control arm. Topical treatment had to be performed once daily, starting on day 1 of 3DCRT. Acute rectal toxicity was scored weekly according to RTOG criteria. Time to occurrence of grade 2+ acute rectal toxicity was taken as endpoint. RESULTS: The trial was opened in August 1999, and after the first 24 patients had been treated, arm 2 was discontinued because of eight patients receiving mesalazine, seven actually developed acute rectal toxicity (five patients grade 3 and two patients grade 2). Until May 2001, 134 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to sucralfate (63 patients), mesalazine (eight patients) or hydrocortisone (63 patients). The cumulative incidence of acute rectal toxicity at the end of treatment by arm is 61.9 +/- 6.1%, 87.5 +/- 11.7%, and 52.4 +/- 6.2% for arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The difference between the mesalazine group and the sucralfate group is highly significant (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.7; p = 0.03). At both uni- and multivariate analysis taking into account several patients and treatment covariates, the difference between hydrocortisone and sucralfate is not significant (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.2; p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Topical mesalazine is contraindicated during radiotherapy. Hydrocortisone enema is not superior to sucralfate in preventing acute rectal toxicity.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2003

Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and prostate gland shrinkage during conformal radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The shrinking effect of 3-month neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAD) on preradiotherapy prostate gland volume is well documented. However, recently, it has been shown that the cancerous prostate gland keeps shrinking up to 12 months after NAD start. Thus, if such a reduction is not taken into account, a larger than planned portion of the surrounding normal tissues might shift in the high-dose region during conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) course. The present study was undertaken to quantify this issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate gland volume reduction between planning CT (plCT) and the last week of 3DCRT (tmtCT) was prospectively assessed in 33 consecutive patients with localized prostate carcinoma. The median time interval between plCT and tmtCT was 2.5 months (2.1-2.7 months). A single observer was asked to draw on each slice prostate gland volume as appropriate. The observer was 'blind' to the timing of CT (plCT vs. tmtCT). In order to estimate intra-observer variability, prostate gland delineation was repeated twice for each data set. Mean prostate gland change, plCT and tmtCT cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) calculations for the rectum were analyzed for each patient. Results were correlated to AD status and its duration before plCT. Means were compared by non-parametric rank tests. RESULTS: Based on an internal protocol, 14 patients (42%) did not receive AD, while 19 patients (58%) had undergone neoadjuvant and concomitant AD. The median duration of AD before plCT ranged from 0.2 to 6 months (median: 2.9 months). Although individual data were highly variable, compared to plCT volume, mean prostate gland volume change at the end of 3DCRT was similar for patients receiving (-7.3%) or not (-7%) androgen deprivation (P=0.77). However, within the group of patients treated with hormones, patients starting AD within 3 months from plCT had a significantly larger reduction in prostate volume (-14.2%) than patients with longer NAD duration (-1.1%, P=0.03). At tmtCT, on average, patients undergoing 3DCRT within 3 months from AD start showed an increase of the amount of rectum receiving 40-75 Gy compared to plCT values. At 40 Gy (V40) the mean difference between tmtCT and plCT was +7.5%. In the other two groups, average variations of V40-70 were within +/-2% of plCT values. However, these differences are not significant. CONCLUSION: For patients who undergo plCT and 3DCRT shortly after AD start, prostate gland shrinkage may be substantial. In some of these patients, this might lead to an unexpected increase of the percentage of rectal wall exposed to intermediate doses.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

[Clinical postoperative surveillance of colorectal carcinoma].

Post-operative follow-up after "curative" surgery for patients affected by colon-rectal carcinoma depends upon multiple variables such as type of operation (conservative or wide surgery), adoption of neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatments (i.e. radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) to surgery, the availability of anatomo-pathological or biological parameters predictive of unfavourable prognosis. Even though an international agreement on follow-up policy has not still reached, patients with colon-rectum cancer should be intensively (every 6 months) checked in the first 3 years from surgery and every 12 months afterwards. An early detection of asymptomatic pelvic recurrences or abdominal neoplastic progression may help prolong survival of patients and improve their quality of life.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Late local treatment morbidity after accelerated radiotherapy or alternating chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To report local long-term morbidity after concomitant boost radiotherapy (AFRT) or alternating chemoradiotherapy (CTRT), we analyzed the toxicity data recorded in 168 patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated at our institution within phase II-III studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients enrolled in three consecutive phase II-III studies and followed for a minimum of three months after the end of treatment were included in the present analysis. Local late reactions were scored prospectively. The actuarial incidence of grade 2 or more (2-4) late local toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC was taken as endpoint. The median follow-up is 32.0 months (range, 3.3-138.1 months). For living patients the minimum and median follow-up are 12.1 and 69.3 months, respectively. RESULTS: The five-year actuarial incidence of grade 2+ and grade 3+ toxicity are 56.7 +/- 5% and 21 +/- 4%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, acute mucositis grade, complementary surgery, primary site and performance status proved to be independent predictive factors of grade 2+ late toxicity with P values of <0.001, 0.009, 0.022 and 0.033, respectively. No effect was found for treatment itself on the incidence of late toxicity, although patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy had a higher probability of confluent mucositis than patients treated with alternating chemoradiotherapy (68% vs 32%, P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of surviving patients develops late complications, although severe irreversible reactions occur in a minority of patients. Acute local toxicity can be used to predict local late toxicity that arises within five years of the end of treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Radiotherapy after prostatectomy.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The role of radiotherapy after prostatectomy is controversial. This paper tries to give some guidelines for everyday practice through an analysis of literature data. METHODS: The potential role of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and salvage setting is discussed. We also report and interpret available literature data for both settings. RESULTS: As regards an increase in or detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy, about 40-50% of patients are rendered bNED with local salvage radiotherapy, but only 10-50% are long-term (5 years) biochemically controlled. A timely salvage treatment is crucial to optimize control probability. As regards adjuvant radiotherapy for undetectable postoperative PSA in patients at high risk of failure as judged on pathology, results are more encouraging. Recent data report bNED rates > 70% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although results are far from satisfactory, salvage radiotherapy should be considered for every patient with an increased or detectable PSA after surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems preferable to salvage radiotherapy for patients at high (> 30%) risk of failure.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Radiotherapy and oral capecitabine in the preoperative treatment of patients with rectal cancer: rationale, preliminary results and perspectives.

Preoperative radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy increases the chances of tumor down-staging and down-sizing and facilitates sphincter-sparing surgical procedures, thereby improving survival and quality of life. Though several innovative agents are being investigated in combination with radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion remains the common schedule used in the preoperative chemoradiation setting. However, the protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil requires specialized pumps and long-term venous access, which makes patients susceptible to infections or thrombosis. To overcome the 5-fluorouracil infusion-related problems, oral 5-fluorouracil precursors and inhibitors of 5-fluorouracil degradation have been developed and explored. These include oral fluoropyrimidines such as tegafur (ftorafur), uracil plus tegafur (UFT), S-1, eniluracil and the oral carbamate capecitabine. Phase I trials have demonstrated the feasibility of the capecitabine-radiotherapy combination with respect to the bolus or infusion 5-fluorouracil-radiation approach and have defined the optimal dose of capecitabine during radiotherapy (825 mg/m2/day through a bid administration). Severe hand-foot syndrome occurred in 7-15% of patients, representing the most commonly observed toxicity. It is noteworthy that severe diarrhea with capecitabine during radiotherapy was not common. Leukopenia frequently occurred but was mild and reversible. Phase II trials, although limited in number, have evidenced a high probability of pathological complete response (up to 31%) with capecitabine and radiation, with an increased probability of sphincter-sparing surgical procedures. Although it is too early to assess whether oral capecitabine will be able to replace iv 5-fluorouracil in combination with preoperative radiotherapy, the NSABP will address this question in a large randomized trial. Finally, phase I-II trials evaluating escalating doses of capecitabine associated with oxaliplatin or irinotecan with radiotherapy are being carried out to assess the maximum-dose tolerance and efficacy in the preoperative setting. It is likely that these new chemoradiation associations might increase rectal cancer clearance, hopefully without increasing toxicity.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Measures of late effects in conservative treatment of breast cancer with standard or hypofractionated radiotherapy.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To confirm the equivalence in terms of late effects between two fractionation schedules of radiotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients treated at our institution from 1999 to 2002, with a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 7-46 months), were evaluated retrospectively. Twenty-nine patients (group A) were treated with standard fractionation: 5000 cGy/25fx/5 weeks, and 29 patients (group B) were treated with a hypofractionated schedule: 4500 cGy/15fx/5 weeks, three fractions per week. Late effects were evaluated using the LENT-SOMA scoring scale. The cosmetic results were assessed on a five-point scale. Skin elasticity was measured using a dedicated device (Cutometer SEM 575). RESULTS: There were no differences in breast volume, age at diagnosis and follow-up between groups. The LENT-SOMA toxicity observed in groups A and B, respectively, was as follows: grade 2-3 pain in five patients in each group; grade 2 breast edema in two and three patients; grade 2-3 and grade 2 fibrosis in six and eight patients; grade 2 and grade 2-3 telangiectasia in two and three patients; grade > or = 2 and 2 arm edema in two and one patients; no ulceration or atrophy were observed. Two patients in group A and one patient in group B needed treatment for breast and arm edema and arm edema, respectively. Very good, good-acceptable, and poor cosmetic results were observed in seven and two, fifteen and nineteen, and six and eight patients, respectively. Median skin elasticity loss due to treatment was -4.19% in group A and -6.29% in group B. These results are not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: LENT-SOMA toxicities were minimal and no differences were observed between groups. Few patients in the hypofractionated group had very good cosmetic results, but it is debatable if radiotherapy was the only cause. Skin elasticity was not different between groups. Our results seem to suggest that it is possible to treat patients with both schedules, with similar late toxicity.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Kidney-sparing radiotherapy by multiple-field three-dimensional technique in the postoperative management of patients with gastric cancer: comparison with standard two-field conformal technique.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The opposed two-field technique is the standard approach for delivering adjuvant radiotherapy to patients with resected gastric cancer. Since a considerable radiation dose may reach both kidneys with this beam arrangement, with a potential risk of late effects, we investigated whether the CT-based multiple-field (M-F) approach was superior in terms of sparing critical organs at risk. METHODS: From March 2001 to March 2004, 19 patients with radically resected gastric cancer entered the study. They were treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy according to the INT 0116 protocol. For each patient dose-volume histograms were calculated and the volume values of both kidneys and liver receiving 25 Gy (V25), 30 Gy (V30) and 40 Gy (V40) individually estimated with the M-F and two-field techniques were compared in detail. RESULTS: Right kidney median V25, V30 and V40 values for the two-field and M-F techniques were 1.50%, 0%, 0% and 0%, 0% and 0%, respectively (P < 0.005, P < 0.01, P < 0.05). Left kidney median V25, V30 and V40 values for the M-F and two-field technique were 16%, 9.80%, 0.90% and 33.20%, 30.20%, 21.40% (P < 0.001, P < 0.0005, P < 0.0005). Liver median V25, V30 and V40 values for the M-F and two-field techniques were 51.30%, 22.30%, 8.90% and 13.30%, 11.60%, 8.10%, respectively (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0005 and P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Our comparison revealed that with the multiple-field technique the right kidney may be largely spared from irradiation; with respect to the two-field technique, the left kidney may receive a significantly reduced dose; however, the liver receives an increased dose that warrants careful long-term monitoring of hepatic function.

Adult↗