Biomedical subjects

Michal Linial

Publications and source records attributed to Michal Linial.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Micropeptides encoded by lncRNAs associated with cancer progression reveal novel immunogenic epitopes.

MOTIVATION: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate gene expression, chromatin organization, and cellular signaling. Recent studies indicate that ∼20% of the ∼36 000 human lncRNA genes harbor small open reading frames (sORFs) capable of producing micropeptides (MPs), whose functions remain largely unknown. Whether these peptides contribute to the cancer immunopeptidome is largely unexplored. RESULTS: We systematically analyzed lncRNAs with strong experimental and computational evidence of MP-encoding potential (∼13% of the initial MP collection). Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we identified 2606 high-confidence lncRNA-derived MPs encoded by 647 genes across 16 cancer types. We then focused on 501 MPs from 124 lncRNA genes whose expression changes significantly across tumor stages and metastatic transitions, representing cancer transitional lncRNAs (Tr-lncRNAs). Dipeptide composition and conservation analyses showed that these MPs differ from a size-matched human coding proteome, supporting their potential as neoantigens. All possible 9-mer peptides were evaluated for predicted binding to prevalent European HLA class I alleles. Approximately 60% of Tr-lncRNA genes and 184 (37%) of derived peptides exhibited strong predicted HLA binding. Peptides from XIST, PCAT7, PVT1, HAND2-AS1 showed broad HLA coverage. Notably, TTN-AS1, encoded an MP (79 aa) generated 33 predicted distinct epitopes spanning all 27 HLA alleles. Our analysis identifies lncRNA-derived MPs as a previously underexplored source of potential cancer neoantigens, highlighting their promise as biomarkers and targets for immunotherapy. AVAILABILITY: Data, code and supplementary materials are available in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20167452 and GitHub: https://github.com/stavzok1/lncrna_peptide_analysis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

BACKGROUND: The Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is a community effort held to understand the field of computational protein function prediction. Every three years, since 2010, the organizers initiate an experiment to collect function predictions on a large set of proteins and then evaluate the performance of predicting methods on a subset of proteins that have accumulated experimental annotations between the submission deadline and the evaluation time. CAFA provides an independent and rigorous assessment of the current state of the art, thus leveling the playing field, highlighting successes, revealing bottlenecks, and offering a forum for the exchange of ideas in protein science. Here, we report the results of the fourth CAFA experiment (CAFA4). RESULTS: CAFA4 featured the participation of 148 methods from 70 research groups on a total of 46,205 unique proteins over a 5-year annotation accumulation phase, the longest in any CAFA. In a comparison across CAFA2-CAFA4 methods, the prediction of Gene Ontology (GO) terms has clearly improved across all three GO aspects and traditional evaluation settings. While not achieving the first rank, several CAFA2 and CAFA3 methods featured in the top ten methods in many evaluations, suggesting that earlier methods still hold relevance. The performance is weaker in the newly introduced "partial knowledge" evaluation category (proteins with experimental annotations before submission deadline that gained additional annotations in the same GO aspect during the annotation accumulation phase), highlighting the need for a new class of methods. The rankings of the methods were stable over the years in traditional evaluation settings, but less so in the new partial knowledge evaluation. Overall, the field continues to progress with some influx of new participants. Sustained efforts will be necessary to substantially advance it.

Journal Article↗