Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael Setzen

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Setzen.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

An otolaryngology, neurology, allergy, and primary care consensus on diagnosis and treatment of sinus headache.

While "sinus" headache is a widely accepted clinical diagnosis, many medical specialists consider it to be an uncommon cause of recurrent headaches. Unnecessary diagnostic studies, surgical interventions, and medical treatments are often the result of the inappropriate diagnosis of sinus headache. Both the International Headache Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery have attempted to characterize conditions leading to headaches of rhinogenic origin. However, they have done so from different perspectives and in isolation from the other specialty groups. An interdisciplinary ad hoc committee recently convened to discuss the role of sinus disease and the nose in the etiology of headache and to review recent epidemiologic studies suggesting that sinus headache (headache of rhinogenic origin) and migraine are frequently confused with one another. Clinical trial data are presented which clearly indicate that the majority of sinus headaches can actually be classified as migraines. This committee reviewed scientific evidence available from multiple disciplines and concludes that considerable research and clinical study are needed to further understand and explain the role of nasal pathology and autonomic activation in migraine and headaches of rhinogenic origin. However, there was a consensus from this group that greater diagnostic and therapeutic attention needs to be given to patients complaining of sinus headache that may indeed be due to the nose.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed2006

Duplicate publication.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗
PubMed2005

Sinus headache: a neurology, otolaryngology, allergy, and primary care consensus on diagnosis and treatment.

Sinus headache is a widely accepted clinical diagnosis, although many medical specialists consider it an uncommon cause of recurrent headaches. The inappropriate diagnosis of sinus headache can lead to unnecessary diagnostic studies, surgical interventions, and medical treatments. Both the International Headache Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery have attempted to define conditions that lead to headaches of rhinogenic origin but have done so from different perspectives and in isolation of each other. An interdisciplinary ad hoc committee convened to discuss the role of sinus disease as a cause of headache and to review recent epidemiological studies that suggest sinus headache (headache of rhinogenic origin) and migraine are frequently confused with one another. This committee reviewed available scientific evidence from multiple disciplines and concluded that considerable research and clinical study are required to further understand and delineate the role of nasal pathology and autonomic activation in migraine and headaches of rhinogenic origin. However, this group agreed that greater diagnostic and therapeutic attention needs to be given to patients with sinus headaches.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The risk of aspiration of pureed food as determined by flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the risk of aspiration of pureed foods in patients with dysphagia with increasing sensory deficits of the hypopharynx with intact versus impaired pharyngeal muscular tone (pharyngeal squeeze). STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred four dysphagic patients underwent flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing and were prospectively divided into 3 groups, with normal, moderate, and severe sensory deficits. Each group was divided into those with normal and those with impaired pharyngeal squeeze. Subjects were given pureed food boluses and were evaluated for aspiration. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the incidence of aspiration of pureed foods for normal and moderate sensory loss when comparing normal and impaired pharyngeal squeeze (P < 0.001, Fisher exact test). There was no significant difference in the severe sensory loss group. In both the normal and impaired pharyngeal squeeze groups, there was no significant difference in aspiration as the sensory deficit increases. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with impaired pharyngeal squeeze at different levels of sensory deficits are at significantly greater risk for aspiration of pureed foods compared with those with normal squeeze. However, as sensory deficits increased, the patients did not show a significant increase in aspiration. The aspiration of pureed foods may depend more on muscle tone of the hypopharynx than on sensation. Dysphagic patients who are given a pureed diet to prevent aspiration may still be at risk for aspiration. This may be easily predicted by the use of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing in conjunction with evaluation of pharyngeal muscle tone.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

The association between laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits, pharyngeal motor function, and the prevalence of aspiration with thin liquids.

OBJECTIVE: The study goal was to evaluate the association among laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits, pharyngeal motor function, and the prevalence of aspiration with thin liquids. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a prospective study of 204 consecutive patients undergoing flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing and an assessment of pharyngeal motor function (pharyngeal squeeze). Patients were divided into 6 groups depending on the results of sensory and motor testing in the laryngopharynx. Subjects were given 5 mL of thin liquid, and the prevalence of aspiration in each group was compared. RESULTS: The mean age of the entire cohort was 65 years (58% female). The prevalence of aspiration in patients with intact laryngopharyngeal sensation was 2% (3 of 137) in persons with intact pharyngeal motor function and 29% (2 of 7) when pharyngeal motor function was impaired (P < 0.05). The prevalence of aspiration in patients with a moderate decrease in laryngopharyngeal sensation was 0% (0 of 9) in persons with intact pharyngeal motor function and 67% (2 of 3) when pharyngeal motor function was impaired (P < 0.05). The prevalence of aspiration in patients with severely diminished or absent laryngopharyngeal sensation was 15% (5 of 33) in persons with intact pharyngeal motor function and 100% (15 of 15) when pharyngeal motor function was impaired (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with severely diminished laryngopharyngeal sensation and pharyngeal motor function are at an extremely high risk of aspirating thin liquids (100%). Moderate sensory deficits only appear to influence the prevalence of thin liquid aspiration in the presence of pharyngeal motor dysfunction. Severe laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits are associated with the aspiration of thin liquids regardless of the integrity of pharyngeal motor function. We assume that all persons with an insensate laryngopharynx aspirate thin liquids until proved otherwise. These results emphasize the relationship between laryngopharyngeal sensation and pharyngeal motor function in the evaluation of patients for suspected aspiration.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing in an outpatient otolaryngology setting.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing in a private otolaryngology office setting. STUDY DESIGN: Five parameters were prospectively evaluated. These included airway compromise, epistaxis, change in heart rate, level of discomfort, and patient's willingness to repeat the examination in the future. METHODS: All persons undergoing flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing between July 1, 1999, and June 30, 2001, were prospectively evaluated. A flexible fiberoptic endoscope with a specially designed air port channel was passed transnasally (without topical anesthesia or nasal constriction) into the more patent nostril. Nasopharyngeal and laryngeal anatomy were first evaluated. Laryngopharyngeal sensory and motor function were then assessed, followed by a comprehensive swallowing evaluation. Five test parameters were examined during each study. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-nine consecutive examinations in 305 adult patients with dysphagia were performed during the study period. Mild epistaxis occurred in four patients (1.1%). There were no episodes of airway obstruction or laryngospasm. There was no statistically significant difference between the average pretest and post-test heart rates; no patients became symptomatically bradycardic or tachycardic. The discomfort ratings were as follows: 44 patients (12.6%) rated the overall discomfort of the test as none, 169 (48.4%) thought it was mild, 110 (31.5%) described moderate discomfort, and 26 (7.5%) said it was severe. Three hundred forty-two (98%) of the patients would repeat the test in the future; seven patients (2%) said that they would not. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing is a safe, well-tolerated procedure to objectively evaluate patients with dysphagia when performed by an experienced speech-language pathologist with an otolaryngologist in attendance in an outpatient office setting.

Adult↗