Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael L Kochman

Publications and source records attributed to Michael L Kochman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Efficacy and costs of a one-day hands-on EASIE endoscopy simulator train-the-trainer workshop.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of an intensive hands-on training in endoscopic hemostasis on the compactEASIE simulator has been previously demonstrated in a randomized prospective trial. In the current study, we evaluated how quickly and effectively new tutors, without simulator training experience, are able to acquire teaching skills in endoscopic hemostasis. METHODS: Five tutors with prior Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (EASIE) teaching experience instructed 7 endoscopists without prior EASIE experience on how to teach when using the model. These new tutors then independently conducted a workshop for 8 fellows in 4 hemostasis techniques. Results were compared with a historical control trained similarly by experienced tutors. Two one-day workshops in endoscopic hemostasis on the compactEASIE ex vivo endoscopy simulator were conducted in a category A hospital in New York City, New York. Skill scores at the end of training were compared with baseline skills assessments, and qualitative ratings of the new tutors were obtained from both the trainees and the experienced tutors. RESULTS: Significant improvement was achieved by the fellows in all 4 skills areas. Both the expert tutors and the trainees consistently rated the teaching skill of the new tutors highly. Fellows' skill acquisition using new tutors was of similar magnitude to that achieved in the prior EASIE trial using experienced trainers teaching the fellows. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to conduct an effective EASIE train-the-trainer course in one day. Tutors trained in this manner are able to provide a similar educational experience with objective improvement in trainee skill to experts who have conducted many hands-on workshops.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2005

Update on biliary endoscopy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, there have been great improvements in the technique, equipment, and clinical utility of biliary endoscopy. In many cases, therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography can take the place of invasive surgery, including common bile duct exploration, thereby decreasing the patient's morbidity and recuperation time. Even with advances, such as stent placement for biliary strictures in a patient after liver transplantation, there is still room for improvement. RECENT FINDINGS: Research over the past year has been focused on areas including improved imaging and tissue sampling of the biliary tree through endoscopic ultrasound techniques, better identification of patients at risk for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and refinements in photodynamic therapy for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. International research has continued to emphasize biliary sphincterotomy compared with balloon dilation for the management of choledocholithiasis. Further developments in other fields, such as living related liver transplantation, provide challenges for the biliary endoscopist. SUMMARY: This review focuses on some of the work being performed in the field of biliary endoscopy. The key studies were chosen to highlight some of the areas currently being investigated as well as to indicate certain fields that need further development.

Biliary Tract Diseases↗
PubMed2004

Technique of endoscopic retrograde puncture and dilatation of total esophageal stenosis in patients with radiation-induced strictures.

BACKGROUND: Complete esophageal stenosis can occur after external beam radiation therapy for malignancies. Treatment for this complication has traditionally involved surgery. METHODS: A new technique to reestablish luminal patency is described. This minimally invasive technique involves retrograde endoscopy by means of gastrostomy tube tract and puncture of the stenotic occlusion followed by stricture dilatation. The procedure is performed under combined endoscopic and laryngoscopic guidance. RESULTS: Five consecutive patients who had complete esophageal stenoses develop after radiation therapy for malignant disease underwent retrograde endoscopy by way of gastrostomy tube tracts. Stenoses were punctured under endoscopic and laryngoscopic guidance with guide wires. Strictures were dilated with wire-guided balloons or polyvinyl dilators. Luminal patency was established in all patients using this technique without procedural complications. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic retrograde puncture and dilatation of total esophageal stenoses is safe, effective, and useful to reestablish luminal patency for radiation-induced strictures. This technique should be attempted before more invasive treatments.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

The effect of lidocaine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla on the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis remains a serious cause of ERCP-related morbidity. Topical application of lidocaine reportedly blunts cholecystokinin release from intestinal mucosa and reduces sphincter of Oddi spasm. A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of lidocaine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla on the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Secondary outcomes evaluated were ease of cannulation and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. METHODS: Patients undergoing ERCP were randomized in blocks of 6 to have 10 mL of either 1% lidocaine or normal saline solution sprayed on the major papilla before cannulation. Patients were observed for the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Patient history- and procedure-related variables were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were enrolled, of whom 32 were excluded after randomization but before analysis. Of patients analyzed, 145 were randomized to treatment with lidocaine and 149 to placebo. No patient was lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference noted in patient history- or procedure-related variables. Seven patients in the lidocaine group and 5 in the placebo group developed post-ERCP pancreatitis (p=0.73). Ease of cannulation did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine sprayed on the major papilla does not decrease the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2004

Initial evaluation of a duodenoscope modified to allow guidewire fixation during ERCP.

BACKGROUND: Catheter/guidewire exchanges during ERCP require the coordinated efforts of an endoscopist and endoscopy assistant. A prototype duodenoscope was developed to improve the control of catheter/guidewire exchange by enabling fixation of guidewires at the elevator lever. METHODS: An initial prototype duodenoscope and a subsequent modification of this instrument were used to perform ERCP in 7 and 10 patients, respectively. The following were recorded: total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, catheter/guidewire exchange time, guidewire repositioning, loss of guidewire access, success or failure of fixation, and endoscopist satisfaction. OBSERVATIONS: The initial and the modified prototype duodenoscopes were used in a variety of catheter/guidewire exchanges (n=46). Guidewire fixation was achieved in 75% of catheter/guidewire exchanges with the initial prototype and in 93% with the modified prototype and was reflected in shorter exchange times. Access to the desired duct was not lost during any exchange, and the need for repositioning was eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: A new prototype duodenoscope with an elevator lever that enables guidewire fixation will improve the ease and efficiency of catheter/guidewire exchange during ERCP. Modifications made to the original prototype improved reliability of guidewire fixation.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗
PubMed2004

Acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a pooled analysis from EUS centers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and the severity of pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. A survey of centers that offer training in EUS in the United States was conducted. METHODS: A list of centers in which training in EUS is offered was obtained from the Web site of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Designated program directors were contacted via e-mail. The information requested included the number of EUS-guided FNA procedures performed for solid pancreatic masses, the number of cases of post-procedure pancreatitis, and the method for tracking complications. For each episode of pancreatitis, technical details were obtained about the procedure, including the location of the mass, the type of fine needle used, the number of needle passes, and the nature of the lesion. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 27 programs contacted returned the questionnaire (70%). In total, 4909 EUS-guided FNAs of solid pancreatic masses were performed in these 19 centers over a mean of 4 years (range 11 months to 9 years). Pancreatitis occurred after 14 (0.29%): 95% CI[0.16, 0.48] procedures. At two centers in which data on complications were prospectively collected, the frequency of acute pancreatitis was 0.64%, suggesting that the frequency of pancreatitis in the retrospective cohort (0.26%) was under-reported (p=0.22). The odds that cases of pancreatitis would be reported were 2.45 greater for the prospective compared with the retrospective cohort (95% CI[0.55, 10.98]). The median duration of hospitalization for treatment of pancreatitis was 3 days (range 1-21 days). The pancreatitis was classified as mild in 10 cases, moderate in 3, and severe in one; one death (proximate cause, pulmonary embolism) occurred after the development of pancreatitis in a patient with multiple comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses is infrequently associated with acute pancreatitis. The procedure appears to be safe when performed by experienced endosonographers. The frequency of post EUS-guided FNA pancreatitis may be underestimated by retrospective analysis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on the management of malignancies.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are limited data evaluating the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). We assessed the impact of EUS on management of known or suspected malignancies. METHODS: Physicians requesting EUS were contacted before the examination and asked: "How would you manage this patient if EUS were not available?" Pre-EUS responses were recorded on standardized forms, and compared with management recommendations as determined by the same requesting physician after EUS. Endosonographers performing the study were blinded to the pre-EUS responses. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from requesting physicians before and after EUS in 90 patients. Requesting physicians were composed of surgeons (33%), non-EUS-performing gastroenterologists (58%), oncologists (3%), internists (4%), and a pulmonologist (1%). After EUS, referring clinicians altered management plans in 46 of 90 patients (51%). By anatomic site, management changes occurred in 12 of 22 patients (56%) undergoing esophageal EUS, 9 of 15 (60%) undergoing gastric EUS, 21 of 43 (49%) undergoing pancreatic EUS, and 4 of 10 (40%) undergoing rectal EUS. There were no significant differences in the frequency of post-EUS management changes with respect to examination site (P = .76). EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) altered management in 9 of 20 (45%) patients. Management changes involved less complex or decreased risk-associated approaches in the majority (70%), and included 14 of 50 (28%) patients in whom surgical procedures were no longer planned. CONCLUSIONS: Based on EUS examination findings, clinicians requesting EUS alter patient management in one half of cases, and more often pursue a less-complicated approach. EUS substantially impacts clinical care, and should be used in appropriate settings to guide patient management.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Biliary endoscopy.

The literature this year contained a number of articles reviewing the different methods of biliary drainage for malignant obstruction, highlighting approaches to unilateral drainage, and stressing the risks of incomplete drainage after contrast injection. A number of articles addressed issues surrounding the differentiation of benign and malignant biliary strictures.

Journal Article↗