Biomedical subjects

Michael I Posner

Publications and source records attributed to Michael I Posner.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference.

BACKGROUND: Hypnosis has been used clinically for hundreds of years and is primarily a phenomenon involving attentive receptive concentration. Cognitive science has not fully exploited hypnosis and hypnotic suggestion as experimental tools. This study was designed to determine whether a hypnotic suggestion to hinder lexical processing could modulate the Stroop effect. METHODS: Behavioral Stroop data were collected from 16 highly suggestible and 16 less suggestible subjects; both naturally vigilant and under posthypnotic suggestion. Subjects were urged to only attend to the ink color and to impede reading the stimuli under posthypnotic suggestion. RESULTS: Whereas posthypnotic suggestion eliminated Stroop interference for highly suggestible subjects, less suggestible control subjects showed no significant reduction in the interference effect. CONCLUSIONS: This outcome challenges the dominant view that word recognition is obligatory for proficient readers, and may provide insight into top-down influences of suggestion on cognition.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Convergence of psychological and biological development.

The special issue provides an opportunity to assess the degree of integration that has been achieved between studies of psychological and biological development. This commentary uses the material in the special issue to address integration of the two fields and to suggest some future developments.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Mental chronometry in the study of individual and group differences.

The papers in this issue are excellent examples of the many uses of measuring reaction time in the exploration of nervous system pathologies. In our commentary we consider mental chronometry as a field that seeks to measure the time course of mental operations in the human nervous system. We draw upon diverse methods such as neuroimaging, electrical recording and reaction time to illustrate the use of chronometry in conjunction with anatomy and genetics to approach both normal individual differences and pathologies. The goal is to examine general and specific changes in neural networks that underlie both variations in normal function and changes due to pathology. Although much remains to be done along these lines, it is now possible to see how the various chronometric contributions outlined in this special issue can converge to provide a basis for improved understanding of the genetic and experiential basis of cognitive and emotional processes.

Cognition↗