Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael E Detsky

Publications and source records attributed to Michael E Detsky.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Does this patient with headache have a migraine or need neuroimaging?

CONTEXT: In assessing the patient with headache, clinicians are often faced with 2 important questions: Is this headache a migraine? Does this patient require neuroimaging? The diagnosis of migraine can direct therapy, and information obtained from the history and physical examination is used by physicians to determine which patients require neuroimaging. OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of the history and physical examination that distinguish patients with migraine from those with other headache types and that identify those patients who should undergo neuroimaging. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: A systematic review was performed using articles from MEDLINE (1966-November 2005) that assessed the performance characteristics of screening questions in diagnosing migraine (with the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria as a gold standard) and addressed the accuracy of the clinical examination in predicting the presence of underlying intracranial pathology (with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard). DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed each study to determine eligibility, abstract data, and classify methodological quality using predetermined criteria. Disagreement was resolved by consensus with a third author. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four studies of screening questions for migraine (n = 1745 patients) and 11 neuroimaging studies (n = 3725 patients) met inclusion criteria. All 4 of the migraine studies illustrated high sensitivity and specificity if 3 or 4 criteria were met. The best predictors can be summarized by the mnemonic POUNDing (Pulsating, duration of 4-72 hOurs, Unilateral, Nausea, Disabling). If 4 of the 5 criteria are met, the likelihood ratio (LR) for definite or possible migraine is 24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-388); if 3 are met, the LR is 3.5 (95% CI, 1.3-9.2), and if 2 or fewer are met, the LR is 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32-0.52). For the neuroimaging question, several clinical features were found on pooled analysis to predict the presence of a serious intracranial abnormality: cluster-type headache (LR, 10.7; 95% CI, 2.2-52); abnormal findings on neurologic examination (LR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.4-12); undefined headache (ie, not cluster-, migraine-, or tension-type) (LR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.0-7.1); headache with aura (LR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6-6.6); headache aggravated by exertion or a valsalva-like maneuver (LR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.8); and headache with vomiting (LR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6). No clinical features were useful in ruling out significant pathologic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of 4 simple historical features can accurately diagnose migraine. Several individual clinical features were found to be associated with a significant intracranial abnormality, and patients with these features should undergo neuroimaging.

Algorithms↗

Left ventricular isovolumic relaxation is a predictor of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between isovolumic left ventricular (LV) relaxation and LV filling pressures remains incompletely explored. If there is a relationship between the rate of early diastolic LV relaxation and LV end-diastolic pressure, this would have important implications concerning both our understanding and, potentially, our treatment of LV diastolic dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: To examine the baseline hemodynamic correlates of LV end-diastolic pressure in patients with both normal and abnormal LV function. METHODS: The relationships between LV end-diastolic pressure, a variety of hemodynamic parameters (tau, the rate of LV isovolumic relaxation, LV peak positive+dP/dt, LV peak systolic pressure and heart rate), measures of LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volume, and age were determined using regression analysis techniques in 104 patients with normal LV systolic function and 90 patients with an LV ejection fraction of less than 40%. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between tau and LV end-diastolic pressure (r=0.743, P<0.001). There were significant univariate relationships between a number of other hemodynamic variables and LV end-diastolic pressure. A multiple regression model demonstrated that tau made the most important contribution to a model where LV end-diastolic pressure is the dependent variable. LV peak systolic pressure and heart rate also made significant contributions to the model. In 33 of these patients, when LV end-diastolic pressure was reduced using an inferior vena cava occlusion balloon, tau did not change. The acute administration of clonidine (n=11) caused an increase in LV end-diastolic pressure that was closely correlated with an observed increase in tau (r=0.843, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that the rate of LV isovolumic relaxation is a predictor of LV end-diastolic pressure.

Cardiac Catheterization↗