Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael D Pasquale

Publications and source records attributed to Michael D Pasquale.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

"Low-dose" recombinant activated factor VII results in less blood and blood product use in traumatic hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare mortality and blood product use in patients who received recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for traumatic hemorrhage to a matched historic control. METHODS: Trauma registry data of bleeding trauma patients who received rFVIIa (40 microg/kg, repeated once if needed) included 28-day mortality; pre- and post-rFVIIa international normalized ratio; and packed red blood cell (PRBC), fresh frozen plasma, platelet, and cryoprecipitate requirements. A control group was created of bleeding patients who did not receive rFVIIa by matching for Injury Severity Score and age. The chi2 and Student's t tests were used to test for significance. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients, well matched to 72 control patients, made up the rFVIIa group. rFVIIa corrected international normalized ratio within 4 hours (from 4.4 to 1.2; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in mortality (control, 40.3%; rFVIIa, 41.4%). The rFVIIa group required significantly fewer PRBC transfusions than the control group (18.3 +/- 7.5 vs. 22.0 +/- 9.7; p = 0.036). Compared with the control group, the rFVIIa group required fewer platelet transfusions (1.4 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.3 +/- 2.1; p = 0.01) and less cryoprecipitate (0.59 +/- 0.54 vs. 1.5 +/- 1.8; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: rFVIIa resulted in significantly less PRBC, platelet, and cryoprecipitate use and equivalent mortality when compared with the matched control group, with no increase in complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Not so FAST.

BACKGROUND: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) as a screening tool in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma will lead to underdiagnosis of abdominal injuries and may have an impact on treatment and outcome in trauma patients. METHODS: From October 2001 to June 2002, a protocol for evaluating hemodynamically stable trauma patients with suspected blunt abdominal injury (BAI) admitted to our institution was implemented using FAST examination as a screening tool for BAI and computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the abdomen and pelvis as a confirmatory test. At the completion of the secondary survey, patients underwent a four-view FAST examination (Sonosite, Bothell, WA) followed within 1 hour by an abdominal/pelvic CT scan. The FAST examination was considered positive if it demonstrated evidence of free intra-abdominal fluid. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging results were recorded at admission, and FAST examination results were compared with CT scan findings, noting the discordance. RESULTS: Patients with suspicion for BAI were evaluated according to protocol (n = 372). Thirteen cases were excluded for inadequate FAST examinations, leaving 359 patients for analysis. There were 313 true-negative FAST examinations, 16 true-positives, 22 false-negatives, and 8 false-positives. Using CT scanning as the confirmatory test for hemoperitoneum, FAST examination had a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 67%, a negative predictive value of 93%, and an accuracy of 92%; chi analysis showed significant discordance between FAST examination and CT scan (5.85%, < 0.001). Six patients with false-negative FAST examinations required laparotomy for intra-abdominal injuries; 16 patients required admission for nonoperative management of injury. Of the 313 true-negative FAST examinations, 19 patients were noted to have intra-abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum and 11 patients were noted to have retroperitoneal injuries. CONCLUSION: Use of FAST examination as a screening tool for BAI in the hemodynamically stable trauma patient results in underdiagnosis of intra-abdominal injury. This may have an impact on treatment and outcome in trauma patients. Hemodynamically stable patients with suspected BAI should undergo routine CT scanning.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2003

Use of admission Glasgow Coma Score, pupil size, and pupil reactivity to determine outcome for trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Determination of nonsurvival in trauma patients is difficult because valid prognostic indicators are lacking. It was hypothesized that patients presenting with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3 as well as fixed and dilated (FD) pupils do not have a reasonable chance of survival. METHODS: From 1999 through 2001, adult trauma patients (age, >14 years) admitted with a GCS of 3 were reviewed. Patients receiving paralytic agents before initial assessment were excluded from analysis. Fixed and dilated pupils were defined as being 4 mm or more in diameter bilaterally and nonreactive to light. In this study, the FD patients were evaluated for survival, resuscitative measures, surgical procedures, length of hospital stay, and organ donation. The non-FD patients were evaluated for survival and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Of the 137 patients evaluated with a GCS of 3, 104 had FD pupils and 33 did not. In the FD group, there were no survivors. On arrival, 28 (37.3%) of the patients were declared dead, and no further interventions were undertaken. Of the 76 patients (62.7%) who underwent further resuscitation, which included 53 surgical procedures, 30 died in the resuscitation bay, 39 within 24 hours, 4 within 48 hours, 2 within 72 hours, and 1 on day 6. There were 18 (23.7%) organ donors. Of the 33 patients without FD pupils, 11 (33%) survived to discharge (mean hospital stay, 21.4 days). Of the 22 nonsurvivors (67%), 10 died in the resuscitation bay, 8 within 24 hours, 1 within 48 hours, 1 on day 4, and 2 on day 6. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with a GCS of 3 and FD pupils have no reasonable chance for survival. A significant percentage of these patients can be salvaged for organ donation. This information should be used in deciding to pursue aggressive resuscitation efforts and in discussing prognosis with family. Patients with a GCS of 3 who are not FD should be aggressively resuscitated because many of these patients survive to discharge.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.

This study compared laparoscopic with open sigmoid colectomy for patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis. Increased use of less invasive techniques makes it vitally important to evaluate outcomes of these techniques as compared with standard open procedures. Patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis without hemorrhage (code 56211) between January 1997 and December 2001 were reviewed. Two groups were identified: those undergoing open sigmoid colectomy and those undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, operative time, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, morbidity/mortality, and hospital charges were compared. During the study period 271 sigmoid colectomies were performed for diverticulitis without hemorrhage: 56 laparoscopically and 215 with the standard open technique. Four patients required conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy. Mean ASA scores were: open group 2.4; laparoscopic group, 1.9 (P < 0.001). Mean operative times were: laparoscopic group, 170 +/- 45 minutes; open group, 140 +/- 49 minutes (P < 0.001). In the open group 39 patients required transfer to the ICU; one patient in the laparoscopic group required transfer to the ICU. Average hospital lengths of stay for the open and laparoscopic groups were 9.06 and 4.12 days, respectively (P < 0.001). Complications were recorded in 57 (27%) of 215 patients who underwent an open procedure versus 5 (9%) of 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy (P < 0.01). There were three deaths in the open group and none in laparoscopic group. Average total hospital charges were 25,700 dollars for open sigmoid colectomy and 17,414 dollars for laparoscopic colectomy. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy compares favorably with open sigmoid colectomy for patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis.

Colectomy↗
PubMed2002

The role of surveillance duplex scanning in preventing venous thromboembolism in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the role of duplex scanning in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE), the correlation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk score with the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and patients who may benefit from surveillance duplex scanning. METHODS: Age, sex, Injury Severity Score (ISS), VTE score, length of stay, diagnoses, and bleeding risk were recorded from the trauma registry in patients who had a duplex scan from 1995 to 2000. RESULTS: There were 1,513 duplex scans obtained (10,141 trauma admissions), 253 (2.5%) cases of DVT (52% above-knee, 8% upper extremity), and 30 cases of PE (0.3%). Only 5 of 21 duplex scans were positive in PE patients. DVT patients were older (52.9 vs. 46.7 years), with higher ISS (24.0 vs. 20.8) than patients without DVT. Regression analysis showed poor correlation between VTE score and DVT incidence (r2 = 0.27). Univariate analysis identified age, ISS, and VTE score as risk predictors for DVT. CONCLUSION: Adherence to an evidence-based VTE prophylaxis protocol is more important than surveillance duplex scanning in preventing VTE in trauma patients.

Chi-Square Distribution↗