Megan C Roberts | Search PubMed

PubMed2026

Mapping the de-implementation of traditional diagnostic tests in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in cancer diagnostics raise questions about when and how to de-implement traditional approaches; however, these processes remain poorly described. At St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH), routine conventional cytogenetics for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) diagnosis was de-implemented in 2018 following adoption of clinical genomics. This study aimed to map this process to inform future diagnostic de-implementation initiatives. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with SJCRH staff involved or impacted by cytogenetics de-implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic and rapid qualitative analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Member-checking was used to verify and refine process maps, which were subsequently reviewed by an external expert panel, representing diverse settings, through focus group discussions. RESULTS: Thirteen SJCRH clinicians participated. De-implementation was described as successful, with no negative impact on patient outcomes. Decision-making began with internal correlation studies that demonstrated superior diagnostic performance of clinical genomics. De-implementation was viewed as a natural evolution that improved molecular classification, resource allocation, and workflow efficiency. Perceived risks included loss of cytogenetics competency, delayed turnaround time, and career insecurity, all addressed institutionally. Lessons learned highlighted the importance of deliberate discussion about logic and evidence supporting de-implementation. Fifteen external experts offered suggestions to improve process map generalizability, highlighting institutional- and system-level considerations. CONCLUSION: De-implementation of cytogenetics in ALL in favor of clinical genomics was successful at SJCRH. This study offers an example of diagnostic de-implementation in cancer care and proposes a structured approach to guide future efforts. De-implementation should be considered alongside introduction of novel diagnostic approaches.

cancer diagnostics↗

PubMed2025

Primary Care Provider Perspectives on Expanded Genomic Screening in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Expanding pediatric genomic screening beyond current newborn screening presents both opportunities and challenges to primary care providers. We are developing a novel paradigm called Age-Based Genomic Screening (ABGS), which will incorporate targeted genomic sequencing for select, highly actionable genetic conditions into routine care at relevant time-points throughout childhood. We surveyed pediatric primary care providers in North Carolina to identify potential ABGS implementation determinants and strategies to address them. STUDY DESIGN: We disseminated an electronic survey to family medicine and pediatric primary care clinicians. Survey items were modeled on constructs previously identified as important to genomic medicine and assessed perceived utility, benefits, barriers, and facilitators of implementing targeted genomic screening in pediatric primary care. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis, as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 93 individuals completed the survey. Over 85% of respondents agreed that genomic screening was important and impactful in their patient care but about 30% lacked confidence in their ability to implement it in their practice. The most cited benefits of the ABGS program were related to readiness for implementation and the evidence, strength, and quality of the intervention. The most concerning barriers included cost for patients and available resources, with 87% and 75% of respondents having extreme or moderate concern for these barriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have implications both for the design of the ABGS pilot program and directions for future research in genomic implementation. In particular, the blueprint for the pilot program must include specific plans for ensuring primary care providers have the time and resources available for shared decision making with their patients about engaging in genomic screening.

Journal Article↗