Biomedical subjects

Meekai To

Publications and source records attributed to Meekai To.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2025

Operationalizing the Wilson-Jungner principles for the genomics era: Consensus recommendations from the International Consortium on Newborn Sequencing.

PURPOSE: For decades, the selection of disorders included in newborn screening (NBS) programs has been guided by principles published by Wilson and Jungner in 1968. As research explores the expansion of conditions included in NBS through genomic sequencing, there is a critical need for updated recommendations to address the opportunities and complexities of genomic data. METHODS: The International Consortium on Newborn Sequencing includes leaders from over 16 research projects investigating genomic NBS across the United Kingdom, Europe, United States, and Oceania. Consortium members were invited to participate in a modified Delphi study, aggregating opinion on the selection of conditions for genomic NBS through 3 rounds of online questionnaires, with feedback provided to participants between rounds. RESULTS: In round 1, 94 participants completed the questionnaire, and 10 of 43 statements reached consensus. In round 2, 81 participants completed the questionnaire, and 14 of 27 statements reached consensus. In round 3, 68 participants completed the questionnaire, and all 10 statements reached 72% or more consensus. CONCLUSION: The 10 consensus recommendations developed in this study can guide future research and public health programs performing genomic NBS. This process also identified key areas of participant discordance, highlighting important topics for future research.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Assessment of the variant prioritization strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study.

PURPOSE: Genomic sequencing offers the opportunity to screen for hundreds of rare genetic conditions. To minimize potential negative impact on families and clinical services, it is crucial to reduce false-positive results while prioritizing clinical utility. We present an automated variant prioritization approach in the Generation Study, a research study investigating genomic sequencing in 100,000 newborns in England. Prioritized variants will subsequently undergo manual review by a registered clinical scientist and a specialist clinician before being reported back to parents. METHODS: We assessed specificity of our automated variant prioritization approach in 34,410 samples not enriched for rare diseases and sensitivity in 546 samples from patients with diagnostic variants in genes relevant to newborn screening. We used coverage and copy-number variants callability metrics to evaluate variant detection. RESULTS: We estimated that 3% to 5% of samples will have prioritized variants that require manual review and that <1% of cases will have reportable variants requiring further confirmation of the condition. Sensitivity in genes included in the Generation Study was estimated to be approximately 80%. Gene-level specificity results led to changes in variant prioritization rules and conditions that are included. CONCLUSION: Gene-specific assessment of variant prioritization is crucial to establish analytical validity prior to inclusion in genomic newborn screening.

Humans↗