Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Maurizio Tonato

Publications and source records attributed to Maurizio Tonato.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Consensus conference on medical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: adjuvant treatment.

The 5-year survival rate for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo complete surgical resection is only 40-69%, depending on the stage. It is well known that distant metastatic disease is the dominant site of recurrence in such patients and this observation served as the basis for trials of postoperative systemic therapy. The earliest trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, which consisted of single alkylating agents, did not achieve this goal or, even worse, showed a detrimental effect on survival. The introduction of more active drugs, such as cisplatin and vinca alkaloids, made it possible to obtain more promising results in terms of delayed recurrence of the disease. A recent meta-analysis of all randomized trials with accrual from January 1965 to December 1991 showed that the absolute risk of death was reduced by 3% at 2 years and by 5% at 5 years for patients who were treated with postoperative cisplatin-containing regimens compared with patients who were treated with surgery alone. Although the results of this meta-analysis suggest that postoperative cisplatin chemotherapy regimens may result in a slight survival improvement, adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC cannot be considered a standard therapy, and it is important that large, carefully conducted, randomized trials are performed in this group of patients. Four such randomized trials are being conducted in Europe. One of them, the ALPI trial, recently completed its accrual with 1200 patients. The IALT, ANITA, and MRC trials are still ongoing. The results of such trials are eagerly awaited and it is hoped that, once the value of postoperative chemotherapy is well ascertained, future developments can further improve results of combined treatment. In such direction, the recently reported results of PORT meta-analysis evaluating the role of radiation therapy are of great contribution in selecting a suitable population for future studies. In fact, only patients with pN2 disease seem to have a beneficial effect in terms of survival, especially if they have a good performance status, while radiotherapy is not justified in N0-1 patients. The optimal integration of chemotherapy and radiation therapy when both therapies are indicated represents another goal for future research.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1989

Double-blind evaluation of analgesic efficacy of orally administered diclofenac, nefopam, and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus codeine in chronic cancer pain.

The analgesic efficacy and toxicity of oral diclofenac sodium 50 mg (q.i.d.) vs. nefopam 60 mg (q.i.d.) and a combination of 640 mg ASA and 40 mg codeine (q.i.d.) in cancer patients with moderate to severe chronic pain has been evaluated in a randomized double-blind study. Planned duration of treatment was 10 days. Pain intensity was evaluated by a visual analog scale. The length of patient participation in the trial, the patient's final global evaluation and the incidence of side effects were also evaluated. Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study. All treatments produced a statistically significant pain relief (P less than 0.01) without differences among groups but only 26 of 99 patients (26.3%) completed the planned treatment period. Mean time in the study was 4.65 days. Inefficacy and side effects were the main reasons for premature treatment interruption. Patients treated with nefopam had a significantly shorter period in the study than patients treated with the other 2 treatments. Adverse effects were slightly more frequent with the nefopam and ASA + codeine regimens. The 3 therapeutic regimens appear to be similar as to analgesic efficacy, but diclofenac presents the advantage of a slightly better safety profile than nefopam and the ASA + codeine combination.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Weekly paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

UNLABELLED: AIMS ANID BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel, a microtubule inhibitor, is one of the most active drugs in metastatic breast cancer. A weekly schedule, at a median dose-intensity of 91 mg/m2, is effective and has less side effects than a 3-week schedule. In this phase II study, we evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly 1 hr paclitaxel infusions in metastatic breast cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: Between February 1999 and February 2001, 26 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with weekly paclitaxel (60-90 mg/m2/1 hour iv infusion/weekly). The treatment was planned to continue until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity; in patients with responsive or stable disease, paclitaxel was stopped after 6 months of therapy. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 18.7 months (range, 6.8-30.8), all patients are assessable for response and toxicity. We obtained 8 partial responses (30.8%), 8 stable disease (30.8%) and 10 disease progression (38.4.%). The overall response was 30.8% (95% CI, 13.1-48.5). The median duration of response was 7.6 months (range, 1.8-12.4); median time to progression was 4.86 months (range, 1.4-12.4); median overall survival was 9.9 months (range, 1.7-29.2+). Treatment was well tolerated. Hematological toxicity was mild and only one patient developed grade 3 anemia. Two patients experienced grade 3 cardiovascular toxicity; both had received anthracycline-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, weekly administration of paclitaxel shows a substantial degree of activity even in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. The toxicity profile is favorable.

Adult↗