Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Maurie Markman

Publications and source records attributed to Maurie Markman.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Clinical Cancer Advances 2005: major research advances in cancer treatment, prevention, and screening--a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This year, for the first time, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is publishing Clinical Cancer Advances 2005: Major Research Advances in Cancer Treatment, Prevention, and Screening, an annual review of the most significant clinical research presented or published over the past year across all cancer types. ASCO embarked on this project to provide the public, patients, policymakers, and physicians with an accessible summary of the year's most important research advances. While not intended to serve as a comprehensive review, this report provides a year-end snapshot of research that will have the greatest impact on patient care. As you will read, there is much good news from the front lines of cancer research. These pages report on new chemotherapy regimens that sharply reduce the risk of recurrence for very common cancers; the "coming of age" of targeted cancer therapies; promising studies of drugs to prevent cancer; and improvements in quality of life for people living with the disease, among many other advances. Survival rates for cancer are on the rise, increasing from 50% to 64% over the last 30 years. Cancer still exacts an enormous toll, however. Nearly 1.4 million Americans will be diagnosed this year, and some 570,000 will die of the disease. Clearly, more research is needed to find effective therapies for the most stubborn cancer types and stages. We need to know more about the long-term effects of newer, more targeted cancer therapies, some of which need to be taken over long periods of time. And we need to devote far greater attention to tracking and improving the care of the nearly 10 million cancer survivors in the United States today. Despite these and other challenges, the message of this report is one of hope. Through the dedicated, persistent pursuit of clinical research and participation in clinical trials by people with cancer, we steadily uncover new and better ways of treating, diagnosing, and preventing a disease that touches the lives of so many. I want to thank the Editorial Board members, the Specialty Editors, and the ASCO Cancer Communications Committee for their dedicated work to develop this report, and I hope you find it useful.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

An examination of characteristics of lung and colon cancer patients participating in a web-based decision support program. Internet-based decision support programs.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the characteristics of cancer patients who employ the Internet as a technique to gather information to assist them in their management. METHODS: To address this issue, aggregate data from individuals with colon (n=7,543), non-small cell lung (n=24,778) and small cell lung (n=13,817) cancers who provided personal clinical information through participation in a proprietary Web-based decision support program (NexProfiler Treatment Option Tools for Cancer; NexCura, Inc., Seattle, Wash., USA) were evaluated for potential differences between specific patient subgroups. RESULTS: Examination of a number of objective (e.g., prior therapy) and subjective (e.g., overall health, activity level) parameters failed to reveal any major differences based on sex, geographical location (US vs. non-US) or newly diagnosed versus recurrent disease (non-small cell lung cancer patients). Several notable findings included: (1) overall >65% of colon cancer patients and >70% of lung cancer patients stated that they 'were interested in learning about clinical trials'; (2) 65-70% of patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer stated that their 'general health was good', while >60% noted they had symptoms and >50% declared their activity level to be essentially 'normal'; (3) while almost 80% of small cell lung cancer patients noted symptoms, >60% stated their activity level was 'normal'. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the population of patients who seek information from Web-based decision support programs share a number of relevant clinical features, yet they appear to represent a unique subset among all individuals with malignant disease. It will be important for oncologists to more fully understand the objectives of this population in order to assist such patients (and their families) in their use of this remarkably powerful, but essentially unregulated, technology.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Carboplatin plus paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced, metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to identify endometrial cancer patients treated in the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic with carboplatin/paclitaxel who had both a histologic diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma and either measurable (CT scan, physical examination) or evaluable (CA-125 criteria) disease. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2003, 22 individuals (median age 65 years) meeting the above noted criteria received a total of 23 courses of carboplatin (AUC 4-6)/paclitaxel (135-175 mg/m2) administered on a 21-day schedule (median six cycles/patient). The overall response rate was 87% (20/23). The most common toxicity was hematologic. Five patients required dose reductions due to excessive toxicity (three hematologic, one gastrointestinal, one fatigue). There were no treatment related deaths. With a median follow-up of 42 months, 13 patients have died of progressive cancer, while four currently have no evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel demonstrates substantial biological activity in endometrial adenocarcinoma. The safety and efficacy of this regimen makes it an attractive option for first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk Stages IC and II uterine corpus cancer: a patient care evaluation study from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk Stages IC and II uterine corpus cancer treated with surgery alone or surgery followed by radiation therapy. METHODS: Patients with uterine corpus cancer diagnosed in 1995 were identified from hospitals in the United States with tumor registry databases. Data were collected on histology, surgical treatment, radiation therapy, recurrence, and survival. Survival analysis was performed using life-table computational method. RESULTS: 713 hospitals submitted data on 10,726 patients with uterine corpus cancer. 9977 patients (93.0%) underwent surgery, and 2624 patients (26.3%) received radiation therapy. Patients with clinical Stages IC and IIA disease who underwent surgery followed by radiation therapy compared to surgery alone had a trend toward improved 5-year relative survival (RS) (81.2% vs. 92.5%; 74.3% vs. 96.0%, respectively). The 5-year RS of patients with surgical Stage IC disease was not statistically different between the surgery alone group and the radiation group (93.9% vs. 91.7%). Patients with surgical Stage IIA and IIB disease did not benefit from radiation therapy compared to surgery alone (5-year RS; 83.7% vs. 98.0% and 82.3% vs. 81.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: There is a trend toward improved survival in patients with clinical Stages IC and IIA uterine corpus cancer when radiation therapy is utilized following surgery. The survival of patients with surgical Stages IC and II uterine corpus cancer is not improved with adjuvant radiation therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Randomized trial of adjuvant intraperitoneal alpha-interferon in stage III ovarian cancer patients who have no evidence of disease after primary surgery and chemotherapy: An intergroup study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the improvement in progression-free and overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer associated with platinum-taxane chemotherapy, strategies are needed to prevent the greater than 70% recurrence rate. METHOD: The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) initiated a phase III intergroup trial of alpha-interferon (IFNalpha-26, Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) in weekly doses of 50 x 10(6) IU (for 6 doses) versus observation only in patients with no pathological evidence of residual disease at second-look surgery in 1988. RESULTS: Patient accrual was extremely slow and the trial was permanently closed in 1999 by the SWOG Data and Safety Monitoring Committee with 74 registered patients. Of these patients, 70 were evaluable for progression-free and overall survival. There was no significant difference between the two study arms in relation to median progression-free survival (P = 0.56). The median survival duration associated with intraperitoneal alpha-interferon had not been reached versus 87 months on the observation arm. In general, intraperitoneal alpha-interferon was well tolerated. There were no treatment-related deaths or grade 4 adverse events. Although no efficacy conclusions can be drawn from this prematurely closed trial, it should be noted that 57% of the patients on the observation arm recurred and all died, whereas 63% recurred and only 43% died on the intraperitoneal alpha-interferon arm. CONCLUSION: Although this was a negative study, there should continue to be interest in the use of biological therapy to improve survival of patients in complete remission following primary chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Hormonal therapy of endometrial cancer.

Hormonal therapy of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer is a well-established therapeutic option. Patients most likely to respond have lower grade tumours and possess progesterone receptors on the surface of their cancer cells.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2005

Role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Safe, effective treatments are needed for relapsed ovarian cancer. Goals include improving symptoms, enhancing quality of life, and prolonging survival. The plethora of agents currently available present difficult choices for physicians. The present effort seeks to examine the role of one of these agents, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. METHODS: A roundtable meeting of experts in the management of ovarian carcinoma was held to build consensus around the present and future role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for ovarian cancer and other gynecologic malignancies. RESULTS: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is effective and well tolerated in relapsed ovarian cancer. When compared with topotecan in a phase III randomized trial, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin showed several advantages: improved quality of life, fewer severe adverse events, fewer dose modifications, less hematologic support, and lower total cost per patient. In platinum-sensitive patients, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin also produced a survival advantage. Results from prospective and retrospective studies further demonstrate the improved cardiac safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared to conventional anthracyclines. CONCLUSIONS: Based on survival and toxicity advantages and a once-monthly administration schedule, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is the first-choice nonplatinum agent for relapsed ovarian cancer. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin may also have clinical application in combination regimens for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, as consolidation/maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer, as a component of first-line therapy for ovarian cancer, and in the treatment of other gynecologic malignancies. Future clinical trials will further define and maximize the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of ovarian cancer and other gynecologic malignancies.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2005

Experience with single-agent paclitaxel consolidation following primary chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Twelve cycles of single-agent paclitaxel have been demonstrated to prolong progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer whom achieved a clinical complete response to a primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen. This trial was conducted to compare the toxicity and disease-free interval of 3 cycles vs. 12 cycles of paclitaxel consolidation in patients treated with an intensive three-drug front-line regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine. METHODS: Following cytoreductive surgery, 26 ovarian cancer patients received primary chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC = 5, day 1), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h, day 1), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2), day 1 day 8), with treatment repeated every 21 days x 6 cycles. The first 13 patients (group A) received three additional cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days). The second set of 13 patients (group B) also received three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) and then received nine additional cycles of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) consolidation therapy. The change from 3 cycles to 12 cycles of consolidation therapy for group B was made following the published results of GOG 178. RESULTS: In group A, all 13 patients completed three courses of consolidation therapy. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and two patients exhibited both grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 3 patients (23%). In group B, 9 of the 13 patients whom were intended to receive 12 total cycles of paclitaxel consolidation were able to complete the program. There was no grade 3-4 neutropenia or anemia in this population, although 1 patient developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 7 patients (54%). Although not a randomized experience, median progression-free interval was 76 weeks for group B, and 47 weeks for group A. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel consolidation therapy can be administered for 12 cycles following first-line carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine induction therapy, but there is considerable risk for development of a moderately severe peripheral neuropathy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine in advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the response rate and progression free and overall survival of patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with paclitaxel, carboplatin and amifostine. To evaluate the toxicity of amifostine when used in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS: Forty-seven eligible patients (median age: 66; range 45-82) with bidimensionally measurable advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial cancer were treated with carboplatin (AUC = 6), paclitaxel (175 mg/M2) and amifostine (740 mg/M2) every 4 weeks for 6 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were 4 CRs (8%) (2 confirmed, 2 unconfirmed) and 15 PRs (32%) (9 confirmed, 6 unconfirmed) for a total response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 56%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI, 6-9 months) and a 6-month PFS rate of 64% (95% CI, 50% to 78%). The median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI, 12 to 17 months). Toxicity was tolerable. While 79% of patients developed Grade 3/4 neutropenia (30% Grade 3, 49% Grade 4), there were no episodes of Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and one episode of infection with grades 3-4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine was well reasonably tolerated in this cohort. The regimen demonstrated significant activity in endometrial cancer, comparable to other multi-agent chemotherapy programs in terms of response rate and survival, and with a favorable toxicity profile.

Adenocarcinoma↗