Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Maurice Laville

Publications and source records attributed to Maurice Laville.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Interstitial expression of alpha-SMA: an early marker of chronic renal allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Renal myofibroblast infiltration has been shown to be strongly associated with renal function decline in several chronic renal diseases. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether early detection of myofibroblast infiltration using alpha-smooth-muscle actin (alpha-SMA) expression in time-zero biopsies predicts renal allograft dysfunction. METHODS: We studied renal tissue from 38 renal transplant patients from whom biopsies had been taken after vascular anastomosis during transplantation to ascertain whether myofibroblasts infiltration predicts renal graft survival. Immunohistochemistry was performed on time-zero biopsies to determine alpha-SMA expression, and this was compared to annual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) variation and other parameters including cold ischaemic time (CIT), donor and recipient age, number of acute rejections, and delayed graft function (DGF). GFR was measured by inulin clearance during of 3 years of follow-up after the transplantation. Progressors were defined as patients with an annual GFR decline >5 ml/min/year. RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between interstitial alpha-SMA expression in time-zero biopsies and GFR evolution during the post-transplantation course (r=0.60, P<0.001). Although progressors had greater interstitial alpha-SMA expression than non progressors (7.9+/-0.7 vs 4.3+/-0.4%), they showed only a tendency towards higher glomerular alpha-SMA expression. In addition, progressors had more interstitial fibrosis in time-zero biopsies than non-progressors. There was no relationship between alpha-SMA expression and CIT, donor and recipient ages, number of acute rejections, and occurrence of DGF. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that alpha-SMA evaluation in time-zero biopsies, especially the combination of alpha-SMA expression and interstitial fibrosis, can strongly predict chronic renal allograft dysfunctions.

Actins↗
PubMed2001

Adaptive response to a low-protein diet in predialysis chronic renal failure patients.

Arandomized, controlled study of 12 patients with mild chronic renal failure was designed to assess the metabolic effects of a low-protein diet supplemented (n = 6) or not (n = 6) with ketoanalogs of amino acids. The protein intake was prescribed so that both groups were isonitrogenous. The dietary survey each month included a 3-d food record and a 24-h urine collection for urea measurement. After a 4- to 6-wk equilibrium period (standard occidental diet, 1.11 g of protein and 32 kcal/kg per d), patients reduced their protein intake to reach 0.71 g of protein/kg per d during the third month. Energy intake was kept constant (31 kcal/kg per d) during the 3-mo period. Compliance to the diet was achieved after 2 mo of training. Leucine turnover measurement was performed before and at the end of the 3-mo low-protein period. There was no clinical change, whereas total body flux decreased by 8% (P < 0.05) and leucine oxidation by 18% (P < 0.05). No difference could be attributed to the ketoanalogs themselves. Thus, under sufficient energy intake, a low-protein diet is nutritionally and metabolically safe during chronic renal failure. The nitrogen-sparing effect of a low-protein diet is still present during mild chronic renal insufficiency.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Evaluation of different approaches to the treatment of arterial hypertension: combination treatment with low dose perindopril/indapamide versus sequential treatment of stepped-dose treatment].

A randomised double-blind comparison of three treatment strategies in 533 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension over 6-9 months. The low-dose perindopril/indapamide (PER/IND) combination (2 mg and 0.625 mg, respectively) daily resulted in a significantly better blood pressure control and systolic blood pressure decrease. In addition, the low-dose PER/IND combination showed superior efficacy/safety criteria than the sequential strategy of atenolol (50 mg) then losartan (50 mg) then amlodipine (5 mg), and the step-by-step strategy of valsartan (40 mg then 80 mg then 80 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg).

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intermediate-dose (25mg/m2) IV melphalan for multiple myeloma with renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a malignant plasma cell disorder which still bears a dramatic prognosis. Renal insufficiency is a frequent and severe complication directly related to prognosis. The aim of our study was to establish whether an intermediate dose of intravenous melphalan, 25 mg/m2, could be safely and efficiently administered to patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment. METHODS: Between January 1990 and April 2000, 45 patients with multiple myeloma received a single intravenous dose of melphalan, 25 mg/m2. Survival was analysed, as well as the duration of response and potential toxicity. In addition, a melphalan pharmacokinetic study was performed. RESULTS: The overall median survival was 45 +/- 43 months after diagnosis. Based on the Cockcroft and Gault formula, 79% patients had renal impairment. For the 28 stage III patients, survival was no different whether renal insufficiency was present or not. Twenty-five out of 34 patients had leukopenia for an average of 13.8 +/- 12 days, and the most frequent adverse effect was infection. The pharmacokinetic study showed that the melphalan area under the curve was positively correlated to the degree of renal insufficiency. However, this was not clinically relevant since patients with the most altered renal function, including those undergoing dialysis, did not present more episodes of leukopenia. DISCUSSION: The present study shows that renal impairment is not a contraindication for aggressive myeloma chemotherapy, even for patients undergoing dialysis. Intravenous melphalan, 25 mg/m2, is associated with good survival and acceptable side-effects. A randomised trial seems needed to compare this melphalan dose with standard melphalan/prednisone or combination chemotherapies.

Adult↗