Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Matthew H Kulke

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew H Kulke.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors.

UNLABELLED: Twenty-one patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors were treated with docetaxel. Although the treatment was well tolerated, no objective radiologic responses were observed. Novel, more effective agents are needed for this disease. BACKGROUND: Traditional combination chemotherapy regimens containing streptozocin, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil have yielded disappointing results in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors. The lack of efficacy of these combinations, together with their toxicity, has led to efforts to investigate therapeutic agents that are potentially more active and tolerable. We, therefore, assessed the efficacy of docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors were treated with docetaxel, administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every three weeks. Patients were followed for evidence of toxicity, response, and survival. RESULTS: Docetaxel was well tolerated in this patient population. However, no objective radiologic responses were noted in any of the 21 patients. Of the 13 patients who were evaluable for biochemical responses to therapy, four (31%) experienced decreases in 24-hour urinary 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5HIAA) excretion of greater than 50%. The clinical course of the patients enrolled in this study was marked by a high incidence of radiologically stable disease (81%), a median progression-free survival time of 10 months, and a median overall survival time of 24 months. CONCLUSION: Although treatment with docetaxel results in biochemical responses in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors, the lack of more significant antitumor activity demonstrates the need for novel, more effective agents in this disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Lack of efficacy of streptozocin and doxorubicin in patients with advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: The combination of streptozocin and doxorubicin has been considered the standard palliative chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs). However, a recent review failed to confirm high antitumor activity in patients with advanced PETs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 16 consecutive patients who received streptozocin and doxorubicin for advanced PETs at Dana Farber/Partners Cancer Care institutions. Baseline patient characteristics, radiographic response to therapy, treatment-related toxicity, progression-free and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: One patient demonstrated an objective partial response to therapy (objective response rate [ORR], 6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-18%). Six patients achieved stable disease (38%; 95% CI, 14-62%) and 9 patients demonstrated disease progression on initial restaging (56%; 95% CI, 33-77%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.8-8.8) and 20.2 months (95% CI, 9.7-37.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort, the combination of streptozocin and doxorubicin failed to demonstrate substantial antitumor activity in patients with advanced PET. Our findings underscore the need for new therapeutic options in this patient population.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Neuroendocrine tumours: clinical presentation and management of localized disease.

Neuroendocrine tumours often present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. They can arise almost anywhere in the body, and are therefore associated with a broad range of local symptoms. The systemic manifestations of neuroendocrine tumours are also diverse, and are related to the secretion of numerous hormones and biogenic amines. In recent years, improved diagnostic techniques, increased recognition of neuroendocrine tumour subtypes, and new therapeutic modalities have enhanced clinicians' ability to detect and appropriately treat these malignancies.

Carcinoid Tumor↗
PubMed2003

A phase II study of modified deGramont 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of a modified deGramont regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have progressed on at least one but not more than two prior chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage 4 colorectal cancer were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 by a 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by leucovorin 500 mg/m2 by a 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 by bolus injection, followed by 5-FU 2.4 g/m2 administered by a 46-hour continuous infusion. Cycles were administered every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy patients were treated and 68 patients had previously received irinotecan. Eleven percent of patients had a partial response, 33% of CEA-evaluable patients had a > or = 50% drop in their CEA level. The median time to progression was 6.2 months, and the median overall survival was 8.7 months. Toxicity was mild to moderate, as 14% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 3% of patients experienced grade 3 neuropathy. CONCLUSION: The modified deGramont regimen of 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin is tolerable and is associated with a modest degree of antitumor activity in patients who have progressed on both 5-FU and irinotecan.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Recent developments in the pharmacological treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Metastatic pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in North America and Europe. The high mortality rate associated with pancreatic cancer is related to the fact that the vast majority of patients develop incurable, metastatic disease. Such patients have, in the past, had few treatment options. In recent years, however, the systemic administration of gemcitabine has been accepted as a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. While treatment with gemcitabine has been shown to result in both clinical benefit and in prolongation of survival, objective tumour responses following therapy with gemcitabine are relatively uncommon and median survival times remain short. Current efforts have, therefore, focused on evaluating chemotherapy regimens in which gemcitabine is combined with a second cytotoxic agent. Several such combinations appear to be associated with higher objective response rates than single-agent gemcitabine and have been well-tolerated in early clinical trials. Ongoing, prospectively randomised clinical trials will help better define the efficacy of these new combinations and will determine if they result in a significant benefit when compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. A number of novel chemotherapeutic and biological agents also appear promising and are likely to play a future role in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Advanced pancreatic cancer: is there a role for combination therapy?

Once thought to be a relatively untreatable disease, pancreatic cancer has recently become a focus of intense clinical research. The systemic administration of gemcitabine (Gemzar) is currently considered the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced disease. While treatment with gemcitabine has been shown to result in both clinical benefit and prolongation of survival, objective tumor responses are relatively uncommon and median survival times remain short. Several recent efforts have therefore focused on evaluating chemotherapy regimens in which gemcitabine is combined with other cytotoxic drugs. While randomized trials have now confirmed that such combinations are associated with higher response rates, they have not yet clearly demonstrated that combination therapy results in a survival advantage. Increasingly, attention has turned to a number of novel chemotherapeutic and biologic agents that appear promising and are likely to play an important future role in the treatment of patients with this disease.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

A Phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma have a poor survival. Chemotherapy with gemcitabine is the standard first-line treatment. In a Phase II trial at one academic cancer center, the clinical safety and activity of combining gemcitabine and docetaxel were assessed. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated, advanced pancreatic carcinoma were eligible. Bidimensionally measurable disease or evaluable disease with an elevated tumor marker, good performance status, and adequate organ function were required. Patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Ciprofloxacin was administered on Days 8-18. Dose attenuations were made as indicated for toxicity. Patients were restaged radiographically after every two cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, and 33 patients were evaluable for response. There were 23 men and 10 women among the evaluable patients. The median age was 63 years, and all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Three patients had received prior chemoradiation for postresection adjuvant therapy. One hundred forty-six cycles of chemotherapy were administered, and 5 cycles (3%) in 4 patients (12%) were complicated by febrile neutropenia. Twenty percent and 11% of patients on Day 8 and Day 15 doses of gemcitabine, respectively, were omitted for toxicity. The objective response rate was 18%, and the median survival was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-11.2 months). The 1-year survival rate was 29%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma is well tolerated and is associated with moderate activity despite aggressive dose reduction. Whether combination regimens are more effective than single agents in the treatment of patients with pancreatic carcinoma awaits evaluation in randomized studies.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2002

Metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Metastatic pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in North America and Europe. In the past, patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer have had few treatment options. However, recently, several effective palliative therapies and procedures have become available. The systemic administration of gemcitabine has been shown to result in clinical benefit and in a prolongation of median survival, and is now established as the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Clinical trials are exploring whether the use of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy combinations will result in further benefit. Several novel chemotherapeutic and biologic agents appear promising, and are likely to play a role in the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer in the future. Palliative procedures, such as biliary or duodenal stenting and celiac plexus blockade, should be considered in conjunction with systemic therapy in patients with specific complications from pancreatic cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A phase II study of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional 5-fluorouracil (ECF) currently represents a standard and effective regimen for the treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer. The use of doxorubicin as an alternative to epirubicin in the ECF regimen has not been evaluated. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, or esophagus were treated with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 repeated every 21 days, in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/day (ACF). RESULTS: Major objective responses were observed in 28 percent of patients (46 percent previously untreated; 13 percent previously treated), with one complete response. The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months, and the median overall survival was 5.8 months (9.3 months previously untreated; 4.5 months previously treated). The major (Grade 3-4) toxicities were neutropenia (34 percent), anorexia (31 percent), nausea (28 percent), diarrhea (19 percent), and stomatitis (16 percent). CONCLUSION: In comparison with historical data taken from published trials of ECF, the ACF regimen appears similar in efficacy when differences in prior treatment status are taken into account. However, ACF appears to be associated with a higher incidence of major toxicities. Our findings therefore support the continued use of epirubicin rather than doxorubicin in combination chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A Phase II trial of vinorelbine in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy regimens increasingly are accepted as a first-line treatment option for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. While active, such regimens also have been associated with toxicity. Vinorelbine is both well tolerated and active in patients with advanced breast, lung cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, but has not previously been evaluated as a single agent in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We, therefore, performed a Phase II study to assess the activity of vinorelbine in this disease. Twenty-nine patients with previously treated or untreated metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were treated with weekly vinorelbine, administered at a dose of 25 mg/m2, and were followed for evidence of radiologic response, toxicity, and survival. Patients received a median of 8 weeks of therapy. While mild myelosuppression was common, only 17 percent of the treated patients developed Grade 3 or Grade 4 neutropenia. Other toxicities included Grade 1-2 constipation in 31 percent, and Grade 1-2 neuropathy in 13 percent of patients. The overall radiologic response rate was 7 percent, the median progression-free survival time was 1.9 months and the median overall survival time was 7.8 months. We conclude that vinorelbine has minimal toxicity but only minor antitumor activity in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A phase II study of troglitazone, an activator of the PPARgamma receptor, in patients with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Troglitazone, a potent activator of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, induces tumor differentiation in human liposarcomas and causes regression of tumors that are derived from human colon cancer cells in nude mice. We therefore assessed the efficacy of troglitazone in the treatment of metastatic colon cancer in humans. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with oral troglitazone. Patients were followed up for evidence of toxicity, tumor response, and survival. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated: no grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities were observed. However, no objective tumor responses were noted, and all 25 patients had progressive disease as their best response to therapy. The median progression-free survival time was only 1.6 months, and the median survival time was 3.9 months. DISCUSSION: Troglitazone is not an active agent for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A phase II study of epirubicin and thalidomide in unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The median survival time for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is <6 months, and no effective standard systemic chemotherapy is available. Both epirubicin (Ellence); Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY, http://www.pfizer.com) and thalidomide (Thalomid); Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ, http://www.celgene.com) have reported activity for HCC as single agents, and they have different mechanisms of action and nonoverlapping toxicities. Therefore, we performed a phase II study using the combination of epirubicin and thalidomide in patients with unresectable and metastatic HCC. METHODS: Nineteen patients with measurable, unresectable, or metastatic HCC were enrolled. All patients were required to have adequate major organ function and performance status. The treatment consisted of weekly epirubicin at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) administered i.v. and daily thalidomide at a dose of 200 mg orally given as a 3-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. Intrapatient dose escalation of thalidomide was allowed every 2 weeks up to 800 mg daily as long as tolerated. Physical examinations, toxicity assessments, and serum chemistry analyses were performed weekly, and tumor measurements were conducted every 8 weeks. RESULTS: All 19 patients enrolled into the study were evaluable for toxicity assessment and 17 patients were evaluable for response assessment. A total of 71 cycles of chemotherapy was administered, with a median of two cycles administered to each patient (range 1-14). No complete or partial responses were observed. Seven patients (41%) had stable disease, with a median duration of 6 months (range 5-14). The median survival time for all 19 patients was 196 days (95% confidence interval 93-302). The treatment was generally well tolerated. Treatment-related toxicities included constipation (grade 3, 5%; grade 2, 37%; grade 1, 21%), fatigue (grade 3, 5%; grade 2, 42%), and sensory neuropathy (grade 2, 5%; grade 1, 32%). Four patients required dose reductions of thalidomide due to treatment-related toxicities, and the median tolerated dose of thalidomide was 200 mg daily. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of epirubicin and thalidomide was well tolerated when administered in the schedule used in this study. This regimen has limited activity in HCC, with some patients achieving stable disease and clinical benefit. There is a need for defining more effective systemic therapies for HCC.

Adult↗