Masafumi Seki | Search PubMed

PubMed2026

BCL11B enhancer hijacking by t(14;16)(q32;q24) translocation defines a novel high-risk subtype of T-ALL.

The molecular classification of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) remains incomplete, limiting risk stratification and the development of targeted therapies. Enhancer hijacking is a critical oncogenic mechanism that deregulates proto-oncogenes by repositioning cisregulatory regions via structural variants. Here, we performed an integrated analysis of pediatric and adult T-ALL and mixed-phenotype acute leukemias (MPALs), using whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing. This analysis identified a group of 14 patients with predominantly T-lineage neoplasms driven by a t(14;16)(q32;q24) translocation, harboring universal GATA3 mutations and CDKN2A/B deletions. Mechanistically, this translocation repositions the ThymoD locus downstream of BCL11B, causing monoallelic, ectopic overexpression of FENDRR and mesenchymal transcription factor genes FOXF1 and FOXC2 and activating epithelial-mesenchymal transition transcription signatures. Immunophenotypic and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses revealed marked lineage ambiguity with myeloid and B-cell differentiation potentials specific to this subtype. Furthermore, functional analyses in CD34+ cord blood cells demonstrated that FOXF1 overexpression promotes myeloid differentiation while suppressing T-cell differentiation, serving as a key factor for lineage specification. Clinically, this subtype was detected in 0.15% to 4.0% of T-ALL/MPAL cases depending on the cohort, showing a median age of 15 years and enrichment in adolescents and young adults. Importantly, patients with t(14;16)(q32;q24) have an extremely poor prognosis, showing a trend toward worse outcomes than high-risk groups such as KMT2A-rearranged early T-cell progenitor-like, SPI1-rearranged, and LMO2 γδ-like T-ALLs. The unique molecular landscape and poor prognosis of patients with the t(14;16)(q32;q24) translocation underscore the need for the development of novel subtype-specific therapeutic approaches.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Spinal low-grade ependymal tumors harboring telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation and chromosome 7 gain with methylation profile of spinal subependymoma.

Spinal intramedullary tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of entities with diverse histopathological features, making their diagnosis particularly challenging. With the introduction of DNA methylation profiling, the underlying biological diversity of these tumors has been increasingly clarified and systematized; however, owing to the rarity of these tumors, case accumulation remains limited, and significant challenges persist. In this study, we identified two cases of spinal ependymal tumors exhibiting a methylation profile of spinal (SP-) subependymoma (SEPN). Both cases occurred in elderly patients and demonstrated circumscribed growth consistent with low-grade ependymal tumors; however, these tumors did not exhibit the typical histopathological features required for a diagnosis of SEPN in the 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors, showing indistinct cluster formation, an astrocytic immunohistochemical profile suggested by Olig2 expression, and relatively elevated Ki-67 labeling indices of 4.5% and 3.1%. At the molecular level, both cases harbored telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations and whole chromosome 7 gain. On two-dimensional t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding analysis, both clustered within the SP-SEPN methylation class at its periphery, with low classifier calibration scores (0.70 and 0.69). According to the current WHO classification, these cases are designated as low-grade ependymal tumors (CNS WHO grade 2) with methylation profile of SP-SEPN because they do not meet the essential WHO histopathological criteria. Ependymal tumors exhibiting a methylation profile consistent with SEPN, but discordant histopathological features have been increasingly recognized, and the appropriate classification of such tumors remains a subject of ongoing debate. These cases provide important insights into the histopathological diversity of ependymal tumors and contribute to establishing a more comprehensive and systematic classification of ependymal tumors.

Aged↗