Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Martin Vogtherr

Publications and source records attributed to Martin Vogtherr.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Antimalarial drug quinacrine binds to C-terminal helix of cellular prion protein.

Using NMR spectroscopy we show that the cellular prion protein constitutes a target for binding of various acridine and phenothiazine derivatives. We unambiguously map the quinacrine binding site of recombinant human prion protein to residues Tyr225, Tyr226, and Gln227 of helix alpha3, which is located near the "protein X" epitope. The millimolar dissociation constant of the complex suggests that in vivo inhibition of prion propagation occurs after 10000-fold concentration of quinacrine within endolysosomes.

Antimalarials↗

Peptide binding induces large scale changes in inter-domain mobility in human Pin1.

Pin1 is a peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase (PPIase) essential for cell cycle regulation. Pin1-catalyzed peptidyl-prolyl isomerization provides a key conformational switch to activate phosphorylation sites with the common phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro sequence motif. This motif is ubiquitously exploited in cellular response to a variety of signals. Pin1 is able to bind phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro-containing sequences at two different sites that compete for the same substrate. One binding site is located within the N-terminal WW domain, which is essential for protein targeting and localization. The other binding site is located in the C-terminal catalytic domain, which is structural homologous to the FK506-binding protein (FKBP) class of PPIases. A flexible linker of 12 residues connects the WW and catalytic domain. To characterize the structure and dynamics of full-length Pin1 in solution, high resolution NMR methods have been used to map the nature of interactions between the two domains of Pin1. In addition, the influence of target peptides on domain interactions has been investigated. The studies reveal a dynamic picture of the domain interactions. 15N spin relaxation data, differential chemical shift mapping, and residual dipolar coupling data indicate that Pin1 can either behave as two independent domains connected by the flexible linker or as a single intact domain with some amount of hinge bending motion depending on the sequence of the bound peptide. The functional importance of the modulation of relative domain flexibility in light of the multitude of interaction partners of Pin1 is discussed.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

NMR-based screening methods for lead discovery.

Diversity and robustness of NMR based screening methods make these techniques highly attractive as tools for drug discovery. Although not all screening techniques discussed here may be applicable to any given target, there is however a good chance that at least one of the described methods will prove productive in finding several medium affinity ligands. A comparison of each of the methods is given in Table 1. For drug targets of molecular weight < 30 kDa SAR by NMR appears to be the method of choice since it yields detailed information about the location of the binding site. It remains to be seen whether 15N-1H-TROSY based screening techniques will prove useful for larger protein targets, especially considering the added effort needed for spectral assignment and the increased complexity due to spectral overlap. Nevertheless, with the application of new cryo-cooled NMR probes, 15N-1H-HSQC based screening can now be considered a high throughput method. Ligand-based NMR screening methods can be used for protein targets of virtually any size, but are restricted in the ligand's binding affinity range. Because sufficient ligand-protein dissociation rates are needed, only binding of ligands with low (milimolar) to intermediate (micromolar) affinities is detectable. It is expected that cryo-cooled NMR probe technology will also advance ligand detected NMR screening to the high throughput level. Certainly protein and ligand concentrations can be lowered drastically and experiment times can be shortened with increased sensitivity. However, spectral overlap will be of major concern when mixtures of up to 100 compounds are to be screened. For such applications only techniques for which the signals of bound ligands survive will be useful, and sophisticated software will be needed to deconvolute the spectra of multiple bound ligands. Although only ligands with medium to low affinities can be found, ligand based NMR screening has been used as an effective prescreening tool for assay based high throughput screening. Identifying a large ensemble of medium affinity ligands may not only aid in building a binding site pharmacophore model (see Chapter 11), but also may yield crucial information for overcoming tissue availability, toxicity, or even intellectual property related problems. Although NMR based screening is only one of the more recent additions to the bag of tools used in drug discovery [1, 2], its simplicity and wide range of application (including protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions) has attracted much attention. Advances in NMR instrumentation and methodology have already paved the road for NMR based screening to become a high throughput technique. In addition to this, NMR is exceptional in the amount of detailed structural [table: see text] information it can provide. Not only can NMR readily reveal the binding site (15N-1H-HSQC screening) or the conformation of the bound ligand (transfer NOE), but it can also supply information that enables precise docking of the ligand to the protein's binding pocket (isotope-filtered NOESY). NMR data can therefore provide a natural connection between experimental HTS and combinatorial chemistry techniques with computational methods such as 3D-database searching (see Chapter 10), virtual screening (docking) and structure-based ligand design (see also Chapter 8).

Animals↗

NMR solution structure and dynamics of the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase domain of the trigger factor from Mycoplasma genitalium compared to FK506-binding protein.

We have solved the solution structure of the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPIase) domain of the trigger factor from Mycoplasma genitalium by homo- and heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. Our results lead to a well-defined structure with a backbone rmsd of 0.23 A. As predicted, the PPIase domain of the trigger factor adopts the FK506 binding protein (FKBP) fold. Furthermore, our NMR relaxation data indicate that the dynamic behavior of the trigger factor PPIase domain and of FKBP are similar. Structural variations when compared to FKBP exist in the flap region and within the bulges of strand 5 of the beta sheet. Although the active-site crevice is similar to that of FKBP, subtle steric variations in this region can explain why FK506 does not bind to the trigger factor. Sequence variability (27% identity) between trigger factor and FKBP results in significant differences in surface charge distribution and the absence of the first strand of the central beta sheet. Our data indicate, however, that this strand may be partially structured as "nascent" beta strand. This makes the trigger factor PPIase domain the most minimal representative of the FKBP like protein family of PPIases.

Amino Acid Sequence↗