Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Martin B Delatycki

Publications and source records attributed to Martin B Delatycki.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Elucidating the Role of SET as a Key Contributor to Neurodevelopmental Disability Within the 9q34.11 Deletion Syndrome Interval.

The 9q34.11 chromosomal region contains multiple neurodevelopmental genes involved in synaptic transmission, axonal structure and neuronal maturation. Pathogenic microdeletions, duplications and single nucleotide variants in numerous genes were previously linked with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Amongst them, SET has recently been implicated in a rare NDD with speech delay and facial dysmorphism. This study reports a female with a heterozygous de novo deletion impacting SET but not other NDD-associated genes at 9q34.11. The proband was initially diagnosed with atypical Rett syndrome with overlapping clinical features of SET haploinsufficiency. The deletion was confirmed using microarray and long-read sequencing. Subsequent quantitative proteomic evaluation identified a significant decrease of SET protein in patient-derived fibroblasts compared to control lines. This study provides insights into the proband's clinical course over their 28 year diagnostic odyssey, and emphasises the benefits of early speech therapy interventions. The proband had no functional speech, but regained the capacity to meaningfully communicate and articulate a limited vocabulary in adulthood, concordant with other reported non-paediatric cases of SET-NDD. This study expands current knowledge on the genotypic and phenotypic spectra of SET-NDD, and pinpoints a smaller 9q34.11 critical region excluding upstream NDD-associated genes, STXBP1 and SPTAN1, implicating SET as a significant NDD-associated gene.

Humans

Offering complex genomic screening in acute pediatric settings: Family decision-making and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Families of children in pediatric acute care who are offered ultrarapid genomic sequencing are making complex decisions during a high-stress period. To reduce complexity for families and clinicians, we offered genomic screening for the child and parents after the completion of diagnostic testing. We evaluated uptake, understanding, and service delivery preferences. METHODS: A cohort of 235 families who had completed ultrarapid diagnostic genomic sequencing at 17 Australian hospitals were offered up to 3 screens on their genomic data: pediatric-onset, adult-onset, and expanded couple carrier screening. We investigated decision making, understanding, and service delivery preferences using surveys at 3 time points (pre counseling, post counseling, and post result) and performed inductive content analysis of pretest genetic counseling transcripts. RESULTS: A total of 119 families (51%) attended genetic counseling with 115 (49%) accepting genomic screening. Survey respondents were more likely to find decisions about couple carrier screening easy (87%) compared with adult (68%; P = .002) or pediatric (71%; P = .01) screening decisions. All respondents with newly detected pathogenic variants accurately recalled this 1 month later. A delayed offer of screening was acceptable to most respondents (78%). CONCLUSION: Separating genomic screening from the stressful diagnostic period is supported by families who demonstrate good knowledge and recall. Our results suggest delaying genomic screening should be trialed more widely.

Humans