Biomedical subjects

Markus Dietrich

Publications and source records attributed to Markus Dietrich.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Decreased intermediate term patency of automated proximal anastomoses evaluated by sequential ultrafast CT.

OBJECTIVE: The Symmetrytrade mark aortic connector creates proximal anastomoses of saphenous vein grafts using a nitinol implant. The device avoids partial clamping and thus possibly reduces neurologic complications. To evaluate graft patency, a single surgeon randomised study was performed in our institution. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients were randomised either to automated proximal anastomoses (group I, n=39, 61 vein grafts connected using the aortic connector, 47 as single, 15 as sequential bypasses) or controls (group II, n=38, 62 proximal anastomoses handsewn, 46 as single, 16 as sequential bypasses). Ultrafast CT-scans were performed on postoperative day 5 in 34 patients of group I and 16 patients of group II to evaluate early graft patency. Intermediate term patency was evaluated with ultrafast CT-scan in 30 patients of group I (46 grafts) and 25 patients of group II (39 grafts) 1 year after the operation. RESULTS: Two early graft occlusions were detected in group I (3.8%). In group II all evaluated grafts were patent 5 days after surgery. 11.4 months after surgery, seven out of 46 grafts were found occluded (15.2%) in group I. In the control group, only one occlusion was detected (2.6%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a trend towards an increased occlusion rate 1 year after surgery with automated connector devices. For evaluation of long-term patency larger patient groups have to be evaluated. Other benefits of these devices have to be proven to promote their clinical application.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

MDCT of the proximal anastomoses created by nitinol implants in coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective two-observer evaluation.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the proximal anastomosis of CABG grafts created by a nitinol aortic connector. After receiving CABG, 33 patients underwent CT examination of the heart. On the same patients, CT was performed on postoperative day 5 (4-row CT, group A) and again 1 year thereafter (16-row CT, group B). Twenty-three ACVB to RCX and 27 ACVB to RCA grafts were included. Every anastomosis was reviewed under different reformations (MIP, MPR and VRT). Interobserver correlation was determined. Five days postoperatively, 48/50 anastomoses were classified as patent. One year postoperatively, 42/50 anastomoses were classified as patent. In both groups, the aortic connector could be visualized with good quality: 1.82+/-1.10 (group A) and 1.93+/-1.22 (group B) for ACVB to RCA, similar results for ACVB to RCX grafts (MPR). Image quality at the aortic connector site did not display a significant difference for any reformation between groups (P>0.05). Within groups, MPR displayed better visualization than MIP and VRT (P<0.05). In the presence of metal implants, CT provides reliable data in evaluation of the proximal anastomosis. Sixteen-row CT does not bring a significant benefit to image quality. MPR displayed the best visualization within both groups.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Automatic connector devices for proximal anastomoses do not decrease embolic debris compared with conventional anastomoses in CABG.

OBJECTIVE: Emboli generated during cardiac surgery have been associated with aortic clamping and manipulation. Proximal anastomotic devices are thought to be less traumatic by eliminating partial clamping, potentially resulting in fewer adverse outcomes. Intra-aortic filtration has been shown to effectively capture particulate debris. We compared the amount of debris released using intra-aortic filtration and the clinical outcomes between conventionally handsewn and automated proximal anastomoses. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. Patients were assigned to the anastomotic device Group I (Symmetry Aortic Connector, n = 39) or the conventional handsewn anastomosis control Group II (n = 38). Proximal anastomoses were performed before cardiopulmonary bypass in both groups. Intra-aortic Filter 1 (EMBOL-X)was deployed prior to partial clamping or puncturing the aorta for device application and removed after the proximal anastomosis was completed. Prior to cross-clamp removal, a second filter was inserted (Filter 2). A core laboratory performed quantitative and histologic analyses of the debris captured. Clinical outcomes included adverse events, neurocognitive test scores, graft patency, and mortality. RESULTS: Preoperative variables and risk factors were not significantly different between Groups I and II (EuroSCORE 3.9+/-2.6 vs. 4.2+/-2.5). Filter analyses showed no significant difference between Groups I and II in Filter 1 or 2 for either surface area of particles or total number of particles (P> 0.005). There was a significant decrease between Filters 1 and 2 in both Groups for surface area of particles (Group I: 18.5+/-23.8 mm2 vs. 10.7+/-16.3 mm2, P = 0.017; Group II: 15.0+/-15.4 mm2 vs. 6.9+/-.6.5 mm2, P = 0.004), and for total number of particles in Group II (8.6+/-3.7 vs. 7.1+/-2.4, P = 0.023). No significant differences were observed between Group I (device) and Group II (control) outcomes for myocardial infarction, neurocognitive deficit, stroke, length of stay, graft occlusion, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The application of proximal aortic connectors without partial clamping does not reduce particulate emboli or affect clinical outcomes compared with conventional anastomoses. Cross-clamping during cardiopulmonary bypass produces less particulate debris than conventional or automated proximal anastomoses performed off-pump, suggesting a major source of emboli is the anastomotic process.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Ultrafast computed tomography for quality control of automated proximal anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: The Symmetry aortic connector uses a nitinol implant to create proximal anastomoses with saphenous vein grafts. Multiple detector-row cardiac computed tomography (MDCT) is used as a noninvasive method of quality control at our institution. METHODS: In 50 elective coronary artery bypass grafting patients who participated in a randomized trial comparing automated with conventionally hand-sewn proximal anastomoses, MDC T was performed on postoperative day 5. Fifty-three automated Symmetry anastomoses were created in 34 patients (group 1). Twenty-five conventionally hand-sewn anastomoses created in 16 patients served as controls (group 2). Graft patency and the presence or absence of high-grade stenosis at the proximal anastomotic site were evaluated. RESULTS: In group 1, 2 (3.8%) of the grafts were found occluded at MDCT or coronary angiography, and no further relevant stenosis was observed. In group 2, at postoperative MDCT all grafts were found patent without significant narrowing of the proximal anastomotic site. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of proximal anastomoses using the Symmetry device has been reported. Patency control with invasive angiography has been performed by other groups. With MDCT, noninvasive evaluation of proximal anastomotic quality and graft patency is possible, even if nitinol is implanted.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

The Heartflo device for distal coronary anastomoses: clinical experiences in 60 patients.

BACKGROUND: The Heartflo anastomotic device automates the suturing process with simultaneous delivery of 10 standard polypropylene sutures through the graft and the coronary vessel wall to construct the anastomosis. We performed clinical testing in 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: One automated distal coronary anastomosis was initially placed in each patient, the other anastomoses were created with standard running sutures. After a "flat foot"-shaped prototype was deployed in 30 patients (group I), the design of the foot was modified and deployment of the new device performed in the next 30 patients (group II). RESULTS: In group I, automated anastomoses were completed in 16 patients (53%) using 1.7 +/- 1 additional stitches. In 26 group II patients (86%), a hemostatic anastomosis using 1.2 +/- 1 additional stitches was achieved. Anastomoses were completed in 19.0 +/- 3 minutes in group I and in 15.6 +/- 2 minutes in group II. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown the feasability of coronary anastomoses using the Heartflo device. The modified version improved tissue capture, resulting in a higher rate of completed anastomoses. Because anastomotic time is still prolonged, an easier suture management is mandatory in the next developmental step.

Aged↗