Biomedical subjects

Mark R Green

Publications and source records attributed to Mark R Green.

35 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Capecitabine in malignant mesothelioma: a phase II trial by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (39807).

PURPOSE: The CALGB performed a phase II multicenter study to evaluate the activity of oral capecitabine in patients with malignant mesothelioma (CALGB 39807). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 15, 2000 and August 31, 2001, 27 patients with mesothelioma were enrolled in this study. Capecitabine was administered at 2500 mg/m(2) per day divided in two doses for 14 days followed by a seven-day break. Cycles were repeated every 21 days with restaging performed every two cycles and therapy continuing for up to six cycles. One patient withdrew from the study prior to receiving therapy and is removed from further analysis. Eligibility criteria included no prior treatment, PS 0-1 by CALGB criteria and histologically documented mesothelioma. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: gender; male 19 (73%), female seven; median age 70 (range 40-81); histology: epithelial 15 (58%), mixed eight (31%), unclassified three; site of origin pleura, 25 (96%); weight loss in previous six months of more than 10% in seven (27%), symptoms longer than six months in five (19%). RESULTS: One patient (4%) had a confirmed PR while 10 (38%) achieved SD for 2-6 cycles. Ten patients (38%) had PD as their best response. There were three patients unevaluable for response and two early deaths. Median survival and failure free survival were 4.9 (95% CI 4-10.8) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.5-4.2) months respectively with a one-year survival of 23% (95% CI 11-49%). Grade three or greater toxicities encountered by at least 10% of patients included lymphopenia (12%), fatigue (12%), dehydration (12%) and diarrhea (15%). Three patients (12%) had grade three skin toxicity or hand-foot syndrome. One patient died of treatment related toxicity during cycle one. CONCLUSION: The antitumor activity of capecitabine is insufficient to warrant further exploration in patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2004

A phase II trial of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene (MGI-114, irofulven) in patients with relapsed or refractory non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene (HMAF; MGI-114, irofulven) as therapy for relapsed or refractory non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: A two-stage phase II design was employed separately for refractory and relapsed patients to differentiate between ineffective treatment (response rate < or =10%) and active treatment (response rate > or =30%). Eligible patients received HMAF 11 mg/m2 per day intravenously over 5 min on days 1-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (15 relapsed; 21 refractory) were treated, and no responses were seen. TOXICITY: Grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia each occurred in 11% of the patients. Grade 3 nausea occurred in 47%; grade 3-4 vomiting in 42%. Twenty-two percent developed grade 3 fatigue. Eleven percent developed grade 3 hallucinations. CONCLUSIONS: HMAF, administered at this dose and schedule, is not active as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory non-small cell lung cancer.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Phase II trial of vinorelbine plus doxorubicin in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9332.

Small-cell lung cancer that progresses after initial response may still be sensitive to systemic treatment. This study assessed doxorubicin plus vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine Injection) in patients who had no prior exposure to these agents. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and doxorubicin at 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The trial was stopped early because of excessive toxicity. The partial response rate was 26.7%. Toxicities included grade IV neutropenia in 73%, and febrile neutropenia and/or sepsis in 60%. Three patients died from sepsis during cycle 1. Performance status 2 was significantly associated with febrile neutropenia (p = 0.044). Although this regimen had some activity, the toxicity precluded further evaluation.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pemetrexed alone and in combination with platinum compounds in the management of malignant mesothelioma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive but rare malignancy with a dismal prognosis. It is traditionally resistant to chemotherapy. Antifolate agents have recently shown promising data in the treatment of this malignancy. Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate inhibitor of thymidylate synthase and other folate-dependent enzymes that has emerged as one of the most active agents in this disease. Several phase I/II trials of pemetrexed as a single agent or in combination with a platinum drug have demonstrated considerable activity in mesothelioma. In a recently published phase III randomized study, pemetrexed/cisplatin showed a significant improvement in survival, response rate, and quality of life compared with single-agent cisplatin. In addition, several trials reported that folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation significantly reduced the toxicity observed with the use of pemetrexed without affecting the efficacy of the drug.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2003

Immunohistochemical detection of occult lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: anatomical pathology results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9761.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to study the detection of occult metastases (OM) in regional lymph nodes using immunohistochemical stain for cytokeratin, and for this study we targeted clinical stage I patients with non-small cell lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The study comprised the first 193 patients entered onto Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 9761. All had clinically staged T(1-2)N(0)M(0) non-small cell lung cancer, and all underwent curative resections of their primary tumors. Samples of the primary tumor and lymph nodes were taken from lymph node stations 2-12 and shipped to a central laboratory, where each lymph node was histologically processed and stained with H&E as well as with immunohistochemical stain using antibodies to cytokeratin (AE1/3). RESULTS: Altogether, we examined 825 lymph nodes. Whereas routine H&E staining allowed us to detect 18 positive lymph nodes, immunohistochemical staining allowed us to detect 45 positive lymph nodes (P < 0.0001). There were 28 OM [i.e., those detectable only by immunohistochemistry (IHC)], and there was 1 metastasis detected only by H&E staining. The OM included 9 OM in N1 stations and 19 OM in N2 stations. Twelve patients with OM had skip metastases. Routine H&E staining upstaged six patients to N1, and IHC added another five. Routine H&E upstaged 9 patients to N2, and IHC added another 11. We also uncovered new details about the way in which H&E detection depends on metastatic tumor burden. Specifically, for the probability of detecting metastases by H&E to exceed 0.50, the maximum diameter of the metastasis must be greater than 0.23 mm. CONCLUSIONS: IHC detects greater than twice as many positive regional lymph nodes as does H&E staining, and the foci of tumor it detects are significantly smaller than those detected by H&E staining.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

PubMed2003

Weekly, high-dose paclitaxel in advanced lung carcinoma: a phase II study with pharmacokinetics by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

BACKGROUND: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B conducted a Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel administered at a maximum dose density for patients with chemotherapy-naïve, advanced-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with Stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC, a performance status (PS) score of 0-1, and no history of chemotherapy exposure were eligible. Paclitaxel, 150 mg/m(2), was administered over 3 hours during Weeks 1-6 of an 8-week cycle. Doses were modified for ANC < 1500/microL or for >or= Grade 2 neuropathy on the day of therapy. Treatment continued until toxicity or disease progression. Pharmacokinetics were assessed at Weeks 1, 3, and 5 of Cycle 1. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (median age, 64 years; range, 31-81 years) were treated. There were 21 males (PS = 0 for 17). Eleven patients had received previous radiation, 2 had brain metastases, 25 had adenocarcinoma, 23 had Stage IV disease, 6 had StageIIIB disease, and 9 had recurrent disease. Grade 3-4 granulocytopenia occurred in 39% of patients. There were no deaths due to toxicity. Grade 2 or 3 neuropathy occurred in 29% and 24% of patients, respectively. Ten (27%) patients had Grade 3 hyperglycemia (glucose concentration > 250 mg/dL). There were 16 partial responses (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26-59%). The median survival period was 12.3 months (95% CI, 7.9-19.6%), and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 52% (95% CI, 39-71%) and 26% (95% CI, 15-45%), respectively. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were consistent with published values and clearance was not induced. Older age and hyperglycemia were associated with greater neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at 150 mg/m(2) per week x 6 every 8 weeks can be administered safely in the cooperative group setting. These Phase II data are comparable to those associated with combination therapy. The weekly dose-dense schedule may be more active than conventional schedules.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Randomized phase II study of cisplatin with gemcitabine or paclitaxel or vinorelbine as induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: cancer and leukemia group B study 9431.

PURPOSE: To evaluate new drugs in combination with cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a randomized phase II study of two cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by two additional cycles of the same drugs with concomitant radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients received four cycles of cisplatin at 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 22, 43, and 64 with arm 1: gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 and 600 mg/m(2) on days 43, 50, 64, and 71; arm 2: paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) for 3 hours on days 1 and 22 and 135 mg/m(2) on days 43 and 64; and arm 3: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 and 15 mg/m(2) on days 43, 50, 64, and 71. Radiotherapy was initiated on day 43 at 2 Gy/d (total dose, 66 Gy). RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five eligible patients were analyzed. Toxicities during induction chemotherapy consisted primarily of grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities during concomitant chemoradiotherapy consisted of thrombocytopenia, granulo-cytopenia, and esophagitis. Response rates after completion of radiotherapy were 74%, 67%, and 73% for arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Median survival for all patients was 17 months. One-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates for the patients on the three arms were 68%/37%/28%, 62%/29%/19%, and 65%/40%/23%. CONCLUSION: Four cycles of gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin can be administered at these doses and schedules. The observed survival rates exceed those of previous CALGB trials and may be attributable to the use of concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Induction chemotherapy added to concomitant chemoradiotherapy is being evaluated in a phase III randomized trial.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Irinotecan plus gemcitabine induces both radiographic and CA 19-9 tumor marker responses in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan and gemcitabine as combination chemotherapy for previously untreated patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received repeated 21-day cycles at starting doses of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 minutes followed immediately by irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) over 90 minutes, both given intravenously on days 1 and 8. Patients were evaluated for objective tumor response, changes in the serum tumor marker CA 19-9, time to tumor progression (TTP), survival, and safety. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were treated. Eleven patients (24%) had 50% or greater reductions in tumor area. These were confirmed one cycle later in nine patients (response rate, 20%; 95% confidence interval, 8% to 32%). Among 44 patients with baseline CA 19-9 determinations, CA 19-9 decreased during therapy in 22 patients (50%) and was reduced by 50% or more in 13 patients (30%). Median TTP was 2.8 months (range, 0.3 to 10.8 months). There were significant (P <.001) correlations between proportional changes in CA 19-9 and radiographic changes in tumor area with regard to extent of change (r =.67), timing of minimum on-study values (r =.85), and tumor progression (r =.89). Median survival was 5.7 months (range, 0.4 to 19.4+ months), and the 1-year survival rate was 27%. Severe toxicities were uncommon and primarily limited to grade 4 neutropenia (2%), grade 4 vomiting (2%), and grade 3 diarrhea (7%). CONCLUSION: Irinotecan/gemcitabine is a new combination that offers encouraging activity in terms of radiographic and CA 19-9 response and notable 1-year survival in pancreatic cancer. The regimen was well tolerated, with minimal grade 3 and 4 toxicities and excellent maintenance of planned dose-intensity.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Outcomes among African-American/non-African-American patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

BACKGROUND: Among patients diagnosed with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), African-Americans have lower survival rates than non-African-Americans. Whether this difference is due to innate characteristics of the disease in the two ethnicities or to disparities in health care is not known. We investigated whether the disparity in survival would persist when patients were treated with similar systemic therapies (i.e., in phase II and phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] trials). METHODS: We assessed 504 consecutive patients (458 non-African-American and 46 African-American) receiving systemic chemotherapy in CALGB studies for advanced NSCLC during the period from 1989 through 1998. Clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment received, and survival data were obtained from the CALGB database. Cox's proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of race/ethnicity on survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The unadjusted 1-year survival rate was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 13% to 38%) for African-American patients and 30% (95% CI = 26% to 35%) for non-African-American patients, a statistically significant difference (8%; 95% CI on the difference = 5% to 12%; P =.03). Multivariable adjustment for the effect of treatment arm, histology, and metastatic site at presentation did not alter the worse outcome for African-American patients. However, the effect of race/ethnicity disappeared after adjustment for performance status and weight loss. African-American patients were more likely than non-African-Americans to present with a poor performance status (83% versus 60%) and substantial weight loss (41% versus 27%) and to be unmarried (59% versus 28%), disabled (31% versus 15%), unemployed (17% versus 7%), and Medicaid recipients (30% versus 8%). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship that we observed between poor performance, weight loss, and socioeconomic status suggests that social circumstances lead to African-Americans presenting with poorer prognostic features.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Therapy choices among older patients with lung carcinoma: an evaluation of two trials of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

BACKGROUND: Despite a greater risk of malignancy and a higher cancer mortality rate for patients age > 65 years, bias in accruing older patients to clinical trials persists. The results from two National Cancer Institute-approved cooperative group trials (Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 8931 [CALGB 8931] and CALGB 9130) were analyzed retrospectively to determine the participation, tolerance of treatment, and outcome of patients age > 70 years. METHODS: Five hundred fifteen patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma participated in two separate, randomized, Phase III clinical trials conducted by CALGB. Retrospective evaluation of patients by four distinct age cohorts (< 50 years, 50-59 years, 60-69 years, and > 70 years) was carried out to determine differences in toxicity, response, and survival. RESULTS: No patients age > 80 were entered on either study, even though there was no age restriction in the study eligibility criteria. No significant differences were seen in response, survival, or continuation of treatment based on age cohort. Significantly increased leukocyte toxicity was seen in older cohorts without a concomitant increase in severe or worse infectious events. CONCLUSIONS: No patients age > 80 were entered on either trial despite their potential eligibility. Patients in the oldest cohort showed no negative impact of age on treatment tolerance, response to treatment, or survival. The aggregate clinical judgment of patients and physicians can identify septuagenarians who should not be denied active consideration for aggressive management of their advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Alimta (pemetrexed disodium): a multitargeted antifolate for the treatment of mesothelioma.

Pemetrexed disodium is an antimetabolite with multiple sites of action. It inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, thymidylate synthase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase (GARFT). As a single agent it is active against a variety of solid tumors. One phase II trial demonstrated a 14.5% response rate for single-agent pemetrexed disodium in patients with previously untreated mesothelioma. The combination of pemetrexed disodium and cisplatin was associated with very encouraging regression rates in mesothelioma patients treated as part of a phase I trial. A subsequent trial showed similarly encouraging activity (10 partial responses out of 25 evaluable patients [40%]) in mesothelioma patients treated with pemetrexed and carboplatin. A large, prospectively randomized, phase III trial of cisplatin alone versus cisplatin and pemetrexed with vitamin support has been completed. The findings will be presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in May 2002.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2002

Perspectives and opportunities: Docetaxel in the current and future treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Docetaxel is active as monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. In addition to the conventional 3-weekly regimen, docetaxel delivered in smaller, weekly doses to patients who are elderly or have comorbidities maintains activity while minimizing myelosuppression. Randomized phase III trials show that docetaxel monotherapy improves survival when compared with best supportive care in both first- and second-line settings. More recently, the combination of docetaxel with cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients has been shown to be significantly superior to the vinorelbine/cisplatin combination in terms of both increased survival and reduced toxicity. Docetaxel can be combined with nonplatinum agents such as gemcitabine to produce regimens that have substantial activity and a favorable therapeutic index. In multimodality therapy, following platinum/etoposide chemoradiation with docetaxel may have played an important role in the encouraging outcome of the recent Southwest Oncology Group 9504 study. If this can be confirmed, docetaxel appears suitable for inclusion in a range of sequential chemoradiotherapy approaches. Docetaxel can safely be combined with a platinum in patients receiving thoracic radiotherapy; and the combination is a candidate for induction therapy in patients with stage IB-IIIA disease. There is also considerable promise in combining docetaxel with any of the large number of molecularly targeted therapies now becoming available.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

PubMed2002

Aberrant p53 staining does not predict cisplatin resistance in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin based chemotherapies have increased the survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer. A mechanism for identifying tumors resistant to cisplatin would be useful in avoiding unnecessary toxicity of platinum regimens. Mutation of p53 has been shown to induce chemotherapy resistance in vitro. We hypothesized that tumors staining for p53 would be resistant to cisplatin. In Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 8935, patients with stage IIIA (N2 node positive) nonsmall cell lung cancer received chemotherapy followed by surgery, then post-operative chemotherapy and/or radiation. All patients underwent pre-treatment staging mediastinoscopy. Twenty-five out of forty-nine pre-treatment mediastinal lymph node specimens stained positively for p53. Positive staining did not correlate with response to chemotherapy or survival. It did predict a slightly higher complete or partial resection rate compared to negative staining (76 vs. 45%) (p = 0.042). A trend toward longer median survivals was seen in patients with positive p53 staining. This study does not support the ability of p53 staining to predict chemotherapy resistance.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed2002

Novel doublets in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study of topotecan plus cisplatin or paclitaxel (CALGB 9430).

Chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (E-SCLC) produces high response rates and improved survival but few cures. We tested three new regimens for E-SCLC that might merit further investigation in a subsequent phase III trial. Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9430 was a randomized phase II study evaluating 4 treatment arms in 57 evaluable, previously untreated E-SCLC patients. Each arm consisted of the following: Arm 1: cisplatin plus topotecan; Arm 2: cisplatin plus paclitaxel; Arm 3: paclitaxel 230 mg/m2 plus topotecan; and Arm 4: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus topotecan. Because of an accrual time difference, Arm 2 will not be discussed in this manuscript. Arm 1 (12 patients) produced 1 complete response (CR, 8%) and an overall response rate (ORR) of 42%. Toxicity was excessive, with 3 deaths (25%). Arm 3 (13 patients) produced no CRs, 7 partial responses (PRs, 54%), median survival of 13.8 months, and failure-free survival (FFS) of 7.41 months, with 3 toxic deaths (25%). Among 32 evaluable patients on Arm 4, there were 2 CRs (6%) and 20 PRs (63%) for an ORR of 69%, median survival of 9.9 months, FFS of 5.21 months, and 1-year survival of 40%. There was 1 possible treatment-related death (3%). Topotecan plus cisplatin, in the doses and schedule employed, produced excessive toxicity and modest efficacy in E-SCLC patients. Paclitaxel (230 mg/m2 on day 1) plus topotecan (1 mg/m2 on days 1-5) produced excessive toxicity that was ameliorated with an attenuated paclitaxel dose (175 mg/m2). With the latter regimen (Arm 4) in patients with a performance status of 0/1, CR rates, FFS, overall survival, and 1-year survival were similar to standard etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy. Further exploration of topoisomerase inhibitors and taxanes in SCLC patients is warranted.

Clinical Trial↗

PubMed2002

Radiotherapy versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in surgically treated IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.

Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Phase II trials utilizing preoperative chemotherapy in selected patients have achieved complete resection rates of 50%-70% with 3-5 year failure-free survival rates of 15%-33%. Between October 1992 and November 1994, 57 adults (50 of whom were evaluable) with surgically staged IIIA NSCLC and pathologically documented ipsilateral mediastinal nodal involvement (N2) were enrolled in a Cancer and Leukemia Group B randomized trial. Preoperative therapy was thought to be critical to facilitating surgical resectability. For patients randomized to the radiotherapy/surgery/radiotherapy (RSR) arm (n = 24), treatment consisted of preoperative radiation therapy (RT) at 40 Gy, surgery, and then additional RT at 14-20 Gy. For patients randomized to the chemotherapy/surgery/chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CSCR) arm (n = 26), treatment consisted of 2 cycles of cisplatin/etoposide with filgrastim support (PE) followed by surgery, 2 more cycles of PE, then RT 54-60 Gy. The total dose of RT on either arm was 54 Gy if completely resected or 60 Gy if incompletely resected or unresected. Clinical characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Thoracotomy was performed in 42 patients (84%), 28 (67%) of whom had complete resection. The median failure-free and overall survival rates were 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-23 months) and 23 months (95% CI, 19 months-infinity) for the RSR arm and 11 months (95% CI, 5-20 months) and 18 months (95% CI, 12-32 months) for the CSCR arm. The rates of overall and complete surgical resection, downstaging of nodal involvement, and failure-free (P = 0.92) and overall survival (P = 0.41) did not differ between the two treatment arms. Moreover, in this trial, the chemotherapy regimen was sufficiently toxic to have had a lower completion rate of prescribed therapy in the CSCR arm than in the RSR arm.

Clinical Trial↗

PubMed2002

The evolving role of gemcitabine and pemetrexed (Alimta) in the management of patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Malignant mesothelioma is a refractory malignancy. Treatment for unresectable disease may provide a palliative benefit, but survival duration is impacted only minimally, if at all. Several newer agents, including difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) and pemetrexed disodium (LY231514, Alimta) appear to have activity against this neoplasm. Phase II data for combination regimens of gemcitabine and a platinum in mesothelioma patients have been encouraging. However, no phase III data are available to place these phase II results in true perspective. In phase I studies of a cisplatin/pemetrexed combination, objective responses occurred in several mesothelioma patients. This led to a phase II trial of pemetrexed alone in untreated mesothelioma patients and a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin alone versus pemetrexed/cisplatin. Phase II activity (15% partial response) was seen with single-agent pemetrexed. The phase III trial accrued over 450 patients. Primary analysis of the phase III data set has been completed and the results will be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting in May 2002.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Irinotecan and gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors: phase I trial.

Using a day 1 and 8, every-3-week schedule, our purpose was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) that can be administered immediately after gemcitabine (Gemzar) at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 IV. In this phase I trial, the maximum tolerated dose was defined as the dose level immediately below the level in which two of the first three patients in any cohort, or at least two of six patients in any expanded cohort, experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity pertained only to toxicity during the first cycle of treatment. Escalation of irinotecan was planned in groups of three patients, with three additional patients added at the first indication of dose-limiting toxicity. A total of 19 patients have been enrolled. Grade 4 diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity at the irinotecan dose of 115 mg/m2. Hematologic toxicity was not dose limiting. Three patients required canceling of the day 8 dose due to grade 3 myelosuppression. Three patients, two with pancreatic cancer and one with metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary, had a partial response. The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan in this combination was 100 mg/m2/dose. The dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea. The maximum tolerated dose is the recommended starting dose for phase II studies.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗